a peace proposal and the security council chain, a policy mentally, spirit, she's worth it. austin brings us the details. well even before wednesdays vote but you as made it clear, it would veto any un security council resolution on a truce in the gases 3 unless it's cold for an immediate cease fire and the unconditional release of all hostages. the latest resolution did include a direct call for both with washington, still use the veto power, the us and boy justified the move sayings but text didn't. the line was specific wording the us had requested without declare, we find the exactly what changes they wanted. and in fact, defending the v times, the last representative claims the resolution would mainly benefit him us and not the people of guys always ro. some members of this council don't seem to want to confront. the reality that today is not israel standing in the way of a ceasefire and hostage deal. it is home us. some members of this council are missing the plot that they refuse to acknowledge. it is from us that instigated this conflict, as it is a mouse that is put millions of p

the washington is blocked a piece proposal in the security council chain. but from all on this side, that's across to all teens, middle east bureau chief with the notion of um, really were, can you just took us through these latest developments from the security council meeting? it seems that piece is awesome. do says, as it's been yes, even before wednesdays votes the us made its position very clear. it would veto a un security council resolution on the truce. and guys, unless it's cold for an immediate cease fire and the unconditional release of all hostages. interestingly, the slightest resolution data include a direct quote for both with washington still used it's vito power and the resolution was not adopted. the us and boy justified the move saying the text didn't align with specific wording, but he was had requested without the clarifying exactly what changes they really wanted defending the veto, the us representative claims. the resolution was mainly benefit him. us not the people of guys. oh is go see let's take a listen on some numbers.

so you take you back to the un security council and listen to the state of palestine speaking in the chain box of people. and there is nobody to an exception. this is what this guy is doing and gaza. these are as to what the objectives this is what the absence of a ceasefire is allowing it to continue doing. this full fledge is ladia assault against the palestinian people. and the palestinian lands is about everything except the hostages. if the families of hostages can see that how can anyone in this room claim of the lice a ceasefire will allow to save lives or lives? this was 2 years ago. this is even more to today a ceasefire of dozens of his own everything. but this is the 1st step towards resolving anything. and what is the answer of those who are still unwilling now, after all this death and destruction? not to call for the unconditional cease, why is it to accept that the king should continue? anthony, with his old everything. while we watched the 12 is living nothing. we have over and over again, statements in this chamber of my own members. without distinction about some fiction

it would also ex-pabd the council's authorities beyond supply chain security to include acquisition security more broadly and grants the council the authority to issue removal or exclusion orders of specific companies when necessary or when directed to do so by the united states congress. our bill woulda streamline process and requires the council to launch an investigation into these sources . i commend the staff. and i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from louisiana is recognized. mr. higgins: i would like to yield time to the gentleman from florida, mr. donalds. the speaker pro tempore: how much time, sir? mr. higgins: i stand corrected, mr. speaker. we are prepared to close. notify further speakers on this bill. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. mr. raskin: i am closing with the admonishon. and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the the gentleman yields back the balance of his time the gentleman from louisiana is recognized. mr. higgins: i support the bill and i yield. the speaker pro tempore: the question is will the house suspend