>> maria, i see it and i can't help but think about 30 years ago when seiko introduced what was reallywatch, which was a tv watch. it got 82 tv channels delivered to your wrist. there was enormous buzz. it was covered on the front page of the "financial times." but it was a big buzz but a big bust. two reasons. one was the design. it was clunky, chunky, and did not look good on the wrist. and the other was it was impracticable. people love tv, but they don't want to watch the yankees game, or in those days, an episode of "m.a.s.h." on a tv with a 1.2-inch screen. here we are 30 years later, and those two great issues are still there. they're two hurdles no one has gotten over yet. one is the design. and then the question of all of the functions that are on the new samsung watch and whatever other watch comes now. the question is, do people really want that on the wrist? >> would you -- wouldnow. the question is do people really want that on the wrist? >> would you wear this, bob benmosche? >> i kind of like my watch. it's interesting because i know that one day when somebody says to me