tells him, hey, it's about semenko, there's a lot of interesting stuff, but it was semenko who broughtnd dovzhenko, that's right, to the odesa cinema. he brought everyone somewhere, he also brought yanovsky into literature, he sent for him, so to speak, when he read his first poems in the newspaper in kyivska, he asked the woman to inquire who he was and bring him to their futuristic organization, he brought when he first went from kyiv to kharkiv to work at his uncle's house, he also passed everyone in the world there, including yanuvsky from... shanov and geosh korupia, from kyiv a futurist poet, who later returned to kyiv, but he also did not miss the cinema, because he shot and wrote the script for two films, both of which were screened, but both films, unfortunately, were lost and both were shot at the odesa film studio, obviously, well, not obviously , in those days when yanovskyi worked there as an editor, that is, their world was tight, they came from kyiv photoism, correctly moved to odesa cinema, it's the same as now, everyone knows everyone, that's how it is in this environm

tells him, hey, that semenko, there’s a lot of interesting things there, but it was semenko who broughtko, that's right, to the odessa film studio, and yanovsky and dovzhenko, that's right, he brought them all led somewhere, he also led yanovsky into literature. sent a lover for him, so to speak, when he read his first poems in a newspaper in kyiv, asked the lover to inquire who he was and bring him to their photography organization, he brought him the same way when he first went from kyiv to kharkiv to work in a vufka, he also passed everyone in the world there, and both yanuvskyi and bazhan, and geush korupia, a kyiv futurist poet, who later returned to kyiv, but did not miss the cinema either, because he shot and wrote. both were filmed, but both films, unfortunately lost, and both were shot at the odesa film studio, it is obvious, well, not obvious, in those days when yanovskyi worked there as an editor, that is, their world was tight, they truly moved from kyiv futurism to odesa cinema, it is the same as now, everyone knows everyone, so in this literary environment, everyone cooper

it as a utopia , you... you understand that all the main characters, all the main ones, mykhailo semenko will be shot, yes, dovzhenko will correct his biography all his life and in the end he will be chopped to pieces, as he said, so will tomaki yanovsky, he will not live to see up to 70 years old, and he will also be constantly oppressed because of this nationalism of his, yes, who else is a ballerina and naah will sit in the camps in golag, yes and but here... there is a phrase of tomaki, i want to quote it, it is the 28th year, friends, and look what is still in the 28th year , it was already the soviet government, and this is the period of ukrainization, but what else could be written, er, so yanovsky writes about himself, obviously, and how was it for everyone to understand that i have one bride, the bride from the cradle, about whom i was thinking, probably, even then, when he didn't know how, he still didn't know how to speak. bride, for whom i lived my whole life, i dedicated a steel sword to her, and for a heavy shield was put under her sword, for her i loved the sea, i put an a

written quite late meeting with maikovsky, yes, he became a ukrainian futurist and went to mykhailo semenko in kharkiv, because he had already left the odesa film factory. poems, and then in old age they were corrected and killed by this spirit of futurism, and in various critical articles there, he wrote about himself, saying that he was young, the mistakes of his youth, played with futurism, i know him already at this stage, when he was already criticizing, but i also know and i also remember that this language is grand and simple, do you hear? we played, it 's payback time, and there was something else, of course, we only have one minute left, and my question is that there are two myths, two cities, russian myths, bulgakov's myth of the city, which entered kyiv, and now we are just trying to somehow overcome it with a ukrainian myth, which is actually organic and true yes and there is a myth of russian odessa, and it is a myth that ilfi petrov and not only them, right? do you think there is a chance that at this historical point and in the catastrophe that we are going through, people wi

yura semenko will definitely not be like him, but this is different, i was with you ksenia lebedeva,

written quite late, a meeting with maikovsky, yes, he became a ukrainian futurist and went to mykhailo semenko in kharkiv, because he left the odesa film factory on yanovsk, he went to kharkiv, became a futurist, wrote futuristic poems, and then in his old age he corrected them and killed this spirit of futurism, and even in various critical articles there he wrote about... with i was playing with futurism when i was young, the mistakes of my youth. i know him already at this stage, when he was already criticizing, but i also know and i also remember this speech is grand and simple, you hear, the trumpets have sounded, it is the time of reckoning and the other thing was indisputable. we only have one minute left, and i have a question such that there are two myths of two cities. russian myths, bulgakov's myth of the city, which has taken root in kyiv, and now we are just trying to somehow overcome it with a ukrainian myth, which is actually organic and true, and there is a myth of russian odesa, and this is a myth that ilfi petrov and not only they, how do you think, is there a chance that act

’s in no way possible to pass through it, minsk leaflet, 1907, it’s amazing that people who loved semenkod guests of the capital of the place at the beginning of the last century, isn’t it? well, komarovka is not only a market, it is only part of a large area in the center of minsk and its history is fascinating, it awaits us ahead an interesting journey through these places, this area got its name from the village of komarovka, which is located. not far from minsk, until 1812 it belonged to the princes radiwill, then it passed to the no less famous vankovich family, by the end of the 19th century it was included in the city limits, some 100 years ago it was a large worker. komarovka district with shacks, streets, now it is the center of the capital, it began to be developed in 1930, it all began with the formation of a square on the general plan, it was listed as komarovskaya, it was called that until 1956, but today... in the fifties, the square became part of the architectural design of stalinsky prospekt and was built up with buildings in the neoclassical style. the first building to

pale, pitiful servant who bows before the authorities in order to become a minister, and mykhailo semenkoches the listeners, the listeners with a cheap provocation, i am quoting phrases from this project right now, and this is what the critics of this project called... they called its creators the creators of this project called kvns and ill-educated people, let's say, such critics as naphtholinic schoolboys and some dinosaurs that do not reach, cannot reach a wide audience. this conflict, all this something will not escape, yes, it is absolutely something foreshadowing. or do you see or actually actually, because actually i 'm sad too, yes, how the stream is presented, because it's such a massive project, because it's the wrong optics, about the stream in my opinion, maybe it's not right, or it's something, that's in general, what is the story with this, with this scandal, the discussion around romance, i will speak for myself, i had a restrained attitude towards this project, i saw many enthusiastic reviews, but i wrote then that i became restrained, because i understand that i am absol

presented as a pale, pathetic servant who bows before the authorities to become a minister , and mykhailo semenkors, listeners with a cheap provocation, this is what i am quoting. now here are actually phrases from this project, and critics of this project called and called its creators kvnschiks and poorly educated people, the creators of this project called, let's say , such critics as naphthalene schoolgirls and there some dinosaurs that do not reach, cannot reach a wide... audience, this conflict, it's all something unavoidable, yes, it's absolutely something predictable, do you see, or actually, actually, because actually i 'm sad too, yes, the way the stream is presented, because it's such a massive project, because it's the wrong optics about the stream in my opinion, maybe it's not right, or it's something, what is it anyway, what this is a story with this, with this scandal, the discussion around that romance. i will speak for myself, i had a restrained attitude towards this project, i saw a lot of enthusiastic reviews, but i wrote then that attitudes, because i understand that i am abso

presented as a pale, pathetic servant who bows before the authorities to become a minister, and mikhail semenkoes listeners, listeners are a cheap provocation, i am quoting phrases from this project right now, and here... critics of this project called they called its creators kvnshchik and poorly educated people. the creators of this project called, say, such critics mothballs and some dinosaurs that do not reach, cannot reach a wide audience. this conflict... this is all something will not be avoided, yes, it is absolutely something predictable, or whether you see, or whether in fact, in fact, because in fact i am saddened too, yes, how the current is presented, because it is such a massive project, because it's the wrong optics about the current, in my opinion, maybe it's wrong, or is it something, what is it, what is it the story with this, with this scandal, the discussion surrounding your romance, i will say for myself, i took a restrained approach to this project, i... saw many enthusiastic reviews, but i wrote then that i was restrained, because i understand that i absolutely not the au

as a pale, miserable servant, who bends before the authorities to become a minister, and mykhailo semenkoes the listeners, the listeners with a cheap provocation, i am quoting phrases from this project right now, and critics of this project called, called its creators kvnschiks and poorly educated people. the creators of this project called, let's say, such critics as naphtholine schoolboys and some dinosaurs that do not reach, cannot reach a wide audience, and this conflict, all this something will not be avoided, it is absolutely something predictable, whether or not you see, or actually, actually, because in fact, i am also saddened by the way the techin is served. because it's such a massive project, because it's the wrong optics, about the channel, in my opinion, maybe it's not right, or it's something, what is it at all, what's the story with this, with this such a scandal? discussion around that romance? i will speak for myself, i was cautious about this project, i saw many enthusiastic reviews, but i wrote then that i was restrained, because i understand that i am absolutely not t