. >> heather olson is senatory's owner. into shoes so it seems like the cat is sending her hints. senatorie doesn't just pick up a shoe here and there, he goes back, grabbing the one he left behind. >> or something that's useful. we've gotten work gloves that fit. so that's nice. >> he's so twisted he took a halloween costume from a child. >> he just brought it in. >> senatorie started swiping in the spring. morning finds him lying next to his night's take feeling accomplished. >> he meows a certain meow. i can try to mimic it. he's just so happy. >> reporter: olson knew the who, where and what but not the how till she snapped on a collar cam which shows senatorie on the prowl. >> i envisioned a crime story being solved. >> olson will go through the neighborhood and try to return people's goods. when the box it full, senatorie is just a year old. the crooked cat is still young and there's no telling what he'll graduate to. >> grand theft. >> reporter: so far everything he's taken is out in the open. maybe he'll end up being

the plan also pits feinstein against democratic senatorial candidate harris and house minority leaderaking this a problem for the political party, the democrats that really needs to be united as we approach that election year. >> and that election year is almost here. what can we expect in the next 12 to 18 months? >> either feinstein moves ahead with her bill creating a huge problem for california's liberals or immigration advocates persuade her to tow the line. one thing. that line they want her to tomei work for others. she's not known for toeing anyone's line. could be a major interparty squabble ahead and that could be ugly. >> sure it will likely be. we'll watch it unfold in our own backyard. thank you, larry. >>> we continue to follow that fire burning near clear lake. up next, where the fire is burning, homes in danger. >>> on capitol hill today, senate republicans lose the latest round to defund planned parenthood. they're next plan of attack, next. the drought is affecting all of us. at pg&e we've definitely put a focus on helping our agricultural customers through the droug

he started as senatorial secret santa gift swap and host an annual hot dish competition for the minnesotakind of obnoxious. >> so, how old were you when your family moved into this house? >> i was six. >> he was raised on this middle class street in st. louis park, minnesota. a suburb of minneapolis. >> we had no quality time at my house. we didn't go skiing or anything like that. but we watched -- hat a lot of quantity time lot was watching comedy. my dad loved to laugh. >> his dad was a printing salesman, his mom a homemaker and real estate agent. were you simultaneously interested in comedy and politics or did that come later? >> i became interested in politics when i was about 11, 12, 13 years old during the civil rights movement. >> he recalls watching police unleash attack dogs on civil rights demonstrators. >> my dad would go, no jew can be for that. no jew can be for that. that was probably the -- when it crystallized to me how important public affairs are. >> franken's fascination with both politics and comedy is actually an ununexpected place in his current house in minneapolis.

absolutely, he wasn't just a pretty face and a senatorial-looking man. but she's certainly had a key role in pushing him into the place where he got to be. susan swain: steve murdock on twitter asked, "wouldn't his newspaper enemies take shot -- shots at harding and his infidelities? " one newspaper person who did was his own father-in-law. kathrine sibley: yes. susan swain: explain the story of amos kling and their relationship and why he would, in fact, in his newspaper criticize his son-in-law. kathrine sibley: yes. in fact, she -- well, this is a long story. i'll try to make it quick. david pietrusza: kling doesn't have a newspaper. kathrine sibley: no, that's right. david pietrusza: he's a banker. he's a businessman. susan swain: but he ultimately doesn't he buy a competing newspaper? kathrine sibley: not that -- not that i know of, no. david pietrusza: i don't believe that's true. susan swain: but i think that maybe what the caller is getting to is that he actually helped to fund an opponent of harding when harding ran for senator. and -- david pie

i don't get people interested in the house of representatives and the senatorial elections? i don't get young people to think that those elections are just as important as the election for president or governor? jordan: i would say televise and more. as far as the presidency goes, the presidential election gives round.tion year the country is always good to talk about the president because he's the leader of our country. that is as it should be. need toame time, we talk about her state level representatives, the ones who are going to have to lead over those bills that he proposes. the ones who will make the decision based on how they feel about which policies they approve of and which ones they do not. we do not see them as much in the media, and the united states a glamorous view of the presidency, and we know not pay as much attention to the real changes, working on our level, closer to us. the ones within our community who were going to present these issues to the president so that he can come up with ideas, so that his cabinet members can come up with ideas that are goin

led by three senators, and yet there was no congressional observer group or senate or y'all -- senatorial observer group as existed in all, all important international agreement negotiations since 1919 and the failure of the league. why? >> i will defer to others on the history of "all." i will say that this is not a treaty. it's an executive agreement -- >> [inaudible] >> let's -- please. >> it's not a treaty in the sense that it is not a legally-binding agreement of the nature of a treaty that requires the two-thirds consent of the senate. it's an executive agreement. it is a political agreement that hinges on, you know, the continued mutual interest of the parties to implement it. so it is different. the second thing i would point out is it's hard to argue that congress has been in the dark. i, i mean, if wendy sherman were up here, my god, the number of briefings, hearings, i don't know a single other issue in the national security space where we spend more time talking to congress. and it's not just now as we're trying to make the case that this deal is a good one and should be suppo

this country is led by three senators and yet there is no congressional observer group or senatorial observer group has existed in all important international agreement negotiations since 1919 in the failure of the lake. why? >> i will differ on the history of all. this is not a treaty. it's an executive agreement. it is not a treaty in the sense that it is not a legally binding agreement of the nature of the treaty that requires a two thirds consent of the senate. it is an executive agreement, a political agreement that hinges on the continued mutual interest of the party to implement. so it is different. the second thing i would point out is it's hard to argue congress has been in the dark. if wendy sherman moore appear, the number of briefings, hearings, i don't know another where we spend more time talking to congress. not just now as we make the case that this deal is a good one and should be supported but through the entire process, folkestone crisis team had been holed up in front and volunteered to meet with any congress -- member of congress seniors that. if you talk on an a