i realized that jefferson speaking parking in and of itself is not to be a part of sequa. but traffic is. and i'm reading the part of the report that talked about traffic - talked about parking but it sort of supposed because i believe this project has no parking people will use ultimate means and that's somewhat fictitious. i'm not sure if there's a traffic analysis in here take a look at the additional traffic that will be generated by people looking around to try to park their cars that retainside in t condos that should there the traffic. - increase the traffic >> i'm with the planning department. getting back to our questions. i believe your referring to page 47 of the amended public works n d and a yes. yes. >> my understanding that the traffic study that was especially prepared was not faith the demand for transit services, however, what we say as you said we don't consider parking impacts sequa impacts so this is a typical analysis we do for this too high projects if that answers your question. >> it actually don't talk about the 24 spaces because the short-term de

she felt the concerns were also about sequa and with that the commissioner asked that the sequa be upheld. and then i wanted to share with you an introduction that was made by supervisor mar that pertains to his ordinance that would regulate formula retail. he introduced a extension that gives us 60 days. await that extension you would need to consider his ordnance by early november now you will have until january. so it won't come before you. and there were no other pieces of legislation that really pertained to land use. that concludes my report >> thank you. >> commissioner moore. >> if i may when we had supervisor mars legislation in front of us we asked whether or not there couldn't be a attempt for all supervisors to join forces together to have a comprehensive reflection on the opinion. i want to pass that on. i think we would be better off having combines from whoever t is interested in the board together >> absolutely i would be interested to know that the supervisor met and having a little bit more time to do the formula work and have that discussion with the public and commissi

document and we can't enter into a binding contract with forest city on the development until after sequa but that was an 11-0 vote at the board of supervisors, a lot of positive testimony from the community at the board. and that, that completed, the phase one, milestones for the project, under our exclusive negotiating agreement. >> this includes two parcels and we hoping to include the pg&e, and we will talk about those as well. and so this is too small to read on the screen, i apologize for that, but this is essentially the exhibit to, the exclusive negotiating agreement and it includes all of the phase two milestones. we will be doing a larger set of transition documents that we will have attached to them, the purchase of the agreements for this 28 acre sight. and feedback as well as provide, the early coordination with the planning department so that we all work as a city team moving forward. a couple of things that come out of that, basically a road map for the environmental review work that we need to do as well as the approval process that we need to move this project through wit

if we can allow someone to tear it's pieces and we'll have to have xmsz from sequa. it should apply to other buildings. if there's allowed to do litigation by paying people or doing it on some other location which one building after another was going to be demolished >> any additional public comment in those. okay >> commissioners - >> yeah. there's an issue about the store that's going to be opened at the corner of van ness and i think sutter and i'm. >> ma'am, is that relthd to the item on calendar for what is it 1285 sutter? >> that's correct. >> you need to wait until that's called and i have a hard of hearing. >> we'll over an opportunity for the public to commit on that item within an hour. >> i wasn't quite sure i apologize. >> it's okay. any additional general public commit on items not on the calendar today. okay general comment is closed >> p that places you under the regular calendar for 200 paul street for request for authorization. >> good afternoon, commissioners corey from staff. it's for additional use to alternate 16 thousand square feet of the build

we've at 25 planners example dictionary b i court staff and made a meaningless full start of sequa reform. well, now that our new vision of san francisco is becoming a realtor we should look at the developments to come. we've got plans that will reshape downtown with the central corridor plan. this plan seeks to include growth along the subway to this new important transit line. two transformational projects are already fitting so what this vision. the first is 5 m at the fifth and a mission streets it had been a high tech canvas with a focus on arts and it will - the intersections for the arts and tech shop and yahoo. next, of course, is the expansion of moscone center it's the key place for our tourism economy. the city has taken on this project with creating more space and more thanizing the building it will address much need public safety. did i mention we're keeping moscone in continues operation during the construction. well, the city is engaged in creating a new violation for our waterfront. 3 partnerships are focusing this discussion each looking at to recognize the project. pier

department in 2008 that's in our file the sf p&g commission has approved this that's in our file and the sequa findings and the updated findings the board and the tender all the time with california water services are in your file fiduciaries. colleagues, any questions or comments. seeing none, any public comments on item number one seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, can we move in forward with recommendation to the full board >> without objection donates the order madam clerk, call item 2. modify when the planning commission can modify reports and. >> we have the planning department here who wants to go first. >> i'm michelle from the controller's office. this item is just to change the frequents by which the report impact and fees it requires that we report every year in december and this change changes to once every other year. the development impact fee that is put together is a technical backgrounds counting report and gives back to the inception of the extending r spending and in lieu of improvements. at the same time it requires the f q to submit a report expect its forw

and is sarah is going to be leading the group that will be looking at sequa and the land use and working with the staff on those issues and david is going to play a significant role in the continued planning work. and the port is going to be focused on the dda and the financial plan to fund all of the infrastructure and steven wheel on the port staff is going to be working very closely with the forest city engineers to develop that infrastructure plan and coordinate with the other city departments like the san francisco public utilities commission and the department of public works. so, we are trying to get an interdisciplinary team from across the city to really focus on how we build this new neighborhood. and so that, and in closing. i mentioned the exclusive negotiating agreement earlier. and we do intend to come back to you with a proposal to amend that exclusive negotiating agreement, perhaps as early as the november meeting. and to address a few issues for this phase two, period of time. so that concludes my presentation and sarah and i are available to answer any questions. >> is