and the sequa guidelines and chapter 31 of the administrator code. that concludes my presentation. unless we have questions >> thank you. we may have questions in a little while. no public comment. okay. then commissioners. commissioner antonini. >> i believe i brought this up i want to reiterate the fact my understanding is that the water would be drawn when available that if there's a situations where we have a year where we have not had enough rainfall and our lakes are in jeopardy like lake merced we would be drawing it when it's available. there's some years when the heavy radiance we have a surplus of water. i understand that's what we have in mind >> correct the mitigation measures that we have identified in the eir do alleyway allow the project to mitigate impacts could less than significant levels concluding impacts on lake merced. and this myths measure envisions a step wise prove that where shall the organization would redistribute pumping and maybe sees pumping until the conditions improve so the water is maintained to significant levels.

under section g for about sequa appeals. the addition of sequa appeals of negative declaration is recommended by the district attorney's office and i'm agreeing with all of those suggested changes. so my motion would be to approve reflecting the changes as suggested by the city attorney and read into the record by the commission secretary >> second. >> can i ask a question. >> commissioner moore. >> the city attorney on the last point give us one or two sentences so i fully understand. >> the portion of sequa regarding the desolations. >> i'm kate from the district attorney's office. commissioner moore the only sequa appeal that comes to the planning commission is that of a negative declaration so it was really for clarification purposes that it optional will be triggered when there's a negative declaration appeal. eirs come automatically for certification and exemptions are part of the project approval that don't have a specific appeal process to the planning commission >> thank you for relatedly us. >> commissioners there

process of sort of reevaluating the phases, and the use, program, and that will be analyzed under sequa and so the phasing could change and it could change now as a result of that analysis and it could also change because the market conditions end up being much bet and her more sustained than the currently conservatively estimating and so all that we have are the current estimates and we will be back in front of you with a revised forest city plan before the sequa starts to give you an update about the phasing plan and the uses in that area. >> and just, and just kind of in agreement with commissioner murphy, that i am not quite sure, why we are promising, if they have to be moved in and we know that eventually they will have to move, that we are promising another site within the port and we don't even know if that is available. >> and so, two that point, and so that is something that we, actually asked for. and we have a mechanism to relocate port tens under pretty much all port leases. and, because of the phasing and uncertainty here, and we were wanting to have a number of different

then we have, you know, 1601 larkin and steve is writing on that not on the sequa decision but on the illegal activities of decision based on private agreements between the neighborhood groups. look in the paper may lee was there and 29 hundred people applied. with the no project alternative was called for by sequa and the method of wanting to build nonprofit use from the beginning and you know what the local methodists are also stopped by it's all over with it was sold to making determine i didn't almost 10 years ago. people have been fidgeting in court preventing the sale >> any additional

with the no project alternative was called for by sequa and the

it was mitigated for the project and in accordance with the california environmental quality act sequa. as the proposed project is directly adjacent to the historic property or resource within the ap e but within the boundaries or boundaries there is no potential for the project to have an adverse effect on the site. in the report before you the design of the property project is sensitive to the district that retains the integrity of the project. the project is inconsistent with the sandy for and as it relates to new construction adjacent to historic properties. in addition 9 archaeology consensus also concluded that the project has any prehistoric deposits and there's a low sensitive at the for the resource to be provided in the resource code. with that, i conclude my staff report and representatives which the project are here to answer questions. i'm available for any questions you have >> thank you does the sponsor have a presentation? yeah. thank you >> the architect unusually does that that are i'm mark i'm oh, great, thank you. principle emerald fund we're the developers in the p

. --- la sequa que se ha registrado este aÑo en california ha llegado a tal grado, que algunos de losamento son ahora visibles desde la superficie. take-vo ---estas imagenes revelan lo que algn da pudiera haber sido una de las primeras ciudades que surgieron a causa de la "fiebre" del oro. ---el pueblo conocido como "la isla de los mormnes" naci de un campamento establecido a lo largo del "american river" en 1840. ---en su apogeo, la ciudad tuvo unos 2 mil 500 habitantes que poco a poco abandonaron el lugar. ---durante la dcada de los 50, la isla de los mormones quedo sumergida. top-vo-blanca ---uno de los llamados grupos de autodefensas de michoacn se apodero ayer del municipio de "churu-muco", michoacn, en donde comenzaron a instalar retenes y a tomar control de los accesos de la alcalda. ---los hechos ocurrieron a las 9:30 de la maÑana, cuando ms de 250 hombres armados, provenientes de los municipios de tepal-catepec, buenavista y aguililla arribaron a la plaza principal. ---el lider del grupo tambien asegur.... que a largo plazo contemplan llegar a morelia, capital del estado. bla

all that they have to do is a study on it but it did not have to be approved and then there is the sequa and the eir and all of these things and one report was ten years old. you know, i just think that we are being run over by this big building and it is going to be huge. >> the developers have been nice and tried to accommodate us and they say that it is born and raised there, but they don't live there any more and with the, and you know, what they are getting out of it is rent. and they are making money off of this, which there is nothing wrong with that. but it is just too big, and potrero avenue is constantly fire engine and ambulances and to add more cars and who got the great idea of putting a residential property when it is zoned industrial. those do not go together, do they? to put that many people and any way, thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker please? >> hi, my name is benny and impart of the ownership of the body shop next door and i want to point out a couple of things before i go with my spiel they said that they were enthuse enthuse when they got 24 signatures we got