that complete application is when th the sequa is completed. that is used throughout the code in other ways. when the application is complete, not the document is complete. that is the reason we are there. the projects could require an eir. there is no way to do an eir in four months. i want to be sure we are on the same page respect to the timeframe. >> the legislative aid. our intent was after the component is completed. at the analysis is completed. >> the issue that happen so we get the sequa document at the same time. a lot of these are smaller scale and wouldn't require expensive process. if it did not require a full er there is a date and timeline that could work. i think, you know, it would be -- i think you don't do that serially, sequa and application, you do them at the same time. >> if you choose the 120 day limit clarify the starting point of the 120 days. if is it the end of sequa process that is certainly different. >> it doesn't require it. you know. >> it can require it sometime. i would suggest it should be the end of the proc

despues que contr y contribuyo a incendios en la i bahia >> estan su punto m bajo en la claridad de sequaegion >> y se mbinno cocon las fuerte lluvias esto no detrieiene a l t turistas >> en noticiero telemundo 48 s m somos la autoridad en el tiempo >> pasamos ccon on las condicio del tiempo >> maciael f semana esas aguas son geniales c con las temperaturas claialien s se disfruta un fin de semana vamos a hablar dbob ha perdido fuerza en las ultimas horas tno trae problemas a msexo y para el sabado llegando a a z exico qasi que ahi se pueden esperar luvias y todavia la humedad que trae el s sistema puede traer condiciones de vientos el fin de semana las personas eo pasa en este m momento desde dsan fsan ranci o vemos la nenblina distinto sali con est e calor decenscenso de m temperaturas 25 grados para san jose muchas ciudades que no ll llegaron a los 2 digitos se i o incorporan los vientos >> ip(informacion en pantalla( >> ip(informacion en pantalla( >> ip(informacion en ntalla( >> i(infpanton en la( para as proximas horas en san jose no necesita un abrigo con t temperaturas sobre los 70

this project with just bringing this one aspect forward and i get we are kind of caught in this pre sequa but we want to see a project that covers entire block and fits your program and covers other things maybe housing on the site. i think totinue to do good work and potentially more. >> commissioner moore: the struggle with parking and when the congregation comes and struggles with parking. there has to be a give and take, most parotski l don't have the land they used to in the past and that land resource can b --k at the creativity of how to address it. >> president hillis: jonas a motion and a second. >> very good commissioners on that motion and second. [roll call] so moved that passes >> good afternoon welcome back to the san francis planning commission. please silence your mobile devices that may sound off during those proceedings and before speaker for the commission, please announce your name for the report. record. this is for 2013.0152cua. you have continued this matter a couple of times to this date. having that you have heard this before, you will limit public testimony. >> p

you think it's six people who work on sequa related to historic preservation and then another group about the same side who works on preservation issues related to the historic preservation commission landmark, survey work, that sort of thing. >> how do we measure the out put of that fund? how do we measure it? >> let's b clear, it's not a set fund. >> okay. >> it's a preservation fund of the department. decribed, i'm hoping to just increase sufficiency for that group of people. >> thank you. i have no questions. i see no one has any questions. let's keep vinmo >> great. >> appreciation your presentation. next elizabeth marie from the war memorial. the war memorial has a budget of $27.5 million. they are asking for increase of .06 million. just give me a second. please have a seat. did we call item 6? >> no, we have not. >> we are going to call item 6. >> item number 6 to allow the planning department to use proceeds for the enforcement fund for activities. >> thank you. i believe we've already heard the presentation on item 6 from director ram's presentation. we'll go to public comment.