i'll be making a presentation covering the puc and water supply agency's role in that sequa process. so that should be a fairly comprehensive presentation on both issues that the planning commission has the best possible understanding of the overall process that is engaged in under law by both the planning department and the puc, as well. i'm working with staff now on what we may bring forward to deal with that issue and we may be able to make that on the 22nd. >> that would be good. the commission secretary would be a party to that. she's smiling at me. >> we may have to bend the rules. >> i would second that. i would like to see something on the 22nd, please, and ask the commission secretary to work with staff to make that happen. >> any other comment? i guess i'm a little unclear and i haven't looked at the resolution in some time, and also in listening to peter's report, a little water update and i know we'll be getting one soon, but it still feels like the vsa may have stalled, the conversations are shorter than we like. there should be things moving forward to help fish, let's

market community adviser community by supervisor hainey passed and at the board, it considered the sequa appeal with 60 residential use units and the planning commission approved this on july 25th of this year, with conditions, pro prohibiting corporate housing. primary concern with the department of environmental analysis for the project did not off account for the soil conditions and the appellant contends the proposed projected would alter existing drainage in the area and result in significant impacts to adjacent buildings in the woodward street district. the appellant contends it was approved under an eir and the impacts of changes since the plan was adopted were not adequately studied through the plan. during the public hearing, they spoke against the project due to impacts on residents and businesses in regards to displacement in the commission. public comment was opposed due to changes in groundwater, hydrology. supervisors confirmed this and denied the appeal. lastly, the city administrators office introduced an ordinance to change from the office of cannabis to cannabis regulat

purpose to the california environmental quality act or sequa, any project that results in an unavoi avoidable resourcet identify impacts, analyzes feasible alternatives and describes measures. this is to solicit comments from the preservation commission on the adequacy on the alternatives for inclusion in the draft environmental impact report. in audition to the required no-project alternative, the team developed a full preservation alternative with a two-story rooftop addition and alterations in interiorinterventions. you will now hand the preservation over to the project team describing the project and alternatives in graduato greate.

purpose to the california environmental quality act or sequa, any project that results in an unavoi avoidable resourcet identify impacts, analyzes feasible alternatives and describes measures. this is to solicit comments from the preservation commission on the adequacy on the alternatives for inclusion in the draft environmental impact report. in audition to the required no-project alternative, the team developed a full preservation alternative with a two-story rooftop addition and alterations in interiorinterventions. you will now hand the preservation over to the project team describing the project and alternatives in graduato greate. >> any idea of how much time do you need? >> up to ten but if you can do it in five. >> in five, absolutely. jodie knight, here on behalf of the project team. thanks for your time today. thanks very much to staff for their hard work on the presentation. justhis is the proposed project which you saw a small picture of. wear excited about this project. it's been a long time in the making with a lot of discussions over the course of the years it's been underway w

incorporattime toincorporate thr the emergency contract and we anywayed to complete, of course, the sequa review. the rehab project, this one is projecting above the baseline budget due to higher costs from actual bids received. we did have to rebid, as well welcome and completion is slated for next year and that completes my report. happy to answer my questions. >>> well >> a question i have has been answered, but i'm concerned when i look through the report and see the red dots. for example, on page 9, and also the time it takes to get up to speed on the project. and what can we do in the future so this isn't happening. overall, i could see that we've never seen a report like this with so many red warning saints. signs. some of these projects, a lot of interdepartmental projects, sometimes their schedules are out of our control. we deal with mta and public works and depending how their schedule is, we have to coordinate because we only want to dig the roads once. we partner and caugh coordinatee projects with those agencies and it takes awhile and we get dragged along. some of the other