SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
48
48
Oct 6, 2014
10/14
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 48
favorite 0
quote 0
have broken ground on phase one and this development is it significant to this - >> under the sequa mitigation measures. >> yeah. >> it has been required to be he same the sequa process hass has required mitigation measures to the standard. >> thank you so. >> oh, go ahead. >> supervisor kim. >> were you down with our prosecution. >> i think it's fine to go on with our questions we've continued with an elevated freeway here's why this is 2 the elevate freeway and muni here previous to this the assumptions about the heights were actually not including this type of property now they are so i want to tell you what's been accomplished one hundred and have 6 properties since the law was passed that have been screened and 38 percent require the clansz ventilation 22 u 32 because of our booming economy we've changed the turn around and offered people to comply with this amendment some people have chosen that sgru just to talk about the filters there have been studies both objection studies and modeling the one in finland where the air they were studying is slightly cleaner and they showed will i usin
have broken ground on phase one and this development is it significant to this - >> under the sequa mitigation measures. >> yeah. >> it has been required to be he same the sequa process hass has required mitigation measures to the standard. >> thank you so. >> oh, go ahead. >> supervisor kim. >> were you down with our prosecution. >> i think it's fine to go on with our questions we've continued with an elevated freeway here's why this is 2 the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
24
24
Oct 13, 2014
10/14
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 24
favorite 0
quote 0
have broken ground on phase one and this development is it significant to this - >> under the sequa mitigation measures. >> yeah. >> it has been required to be he same the sequa process hass has required mitigation measures to the standard. >> thank you so. >> oh, go ahead. >> supervisor kim. >> were you down with our prosecution. >> i think it's fine to go on with our questions we've continued with an
have broken ground on phase one and this development is it significant to this - >> under the sequa mitigation measures. >> yeah. >> it has been required to be he same the sequa process hass has required mitigation measures to the standard. >> thank you so. >> oh, go ahead. >> supervisor kim. >> were you down with our prosecution. >> i think it's fine to go on with our questions we've continued with an
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
22
22
Oct 20, 2014
10/14
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 22
favorite 0
quote 0
have broken ground on phase one and this development is it significant to this - >> under the sequa mitigation measures. >> yeah. >> it has been required to be he same the sequa process hass has required mitigation measures to the standard. >> thank you so. >> oh, go ahead. >> supervisor kim. >> were you down with our prosecution. >> i think it's fine to go on with our questions we've continued with an elevated freeway here's why this is 2 the elevate freeway and muni here previous to this the assumptions about the heights were actually not including this type of property now they are so i want to tell you what's been accomplished one hundred and have 6 properties since the law was passed that have been screened and
have broken ground on phase one and this development is it significant to this - >> under the sequa mitigation measures. >> yeah. >> it has been required to be he same the sequa process hass has required mitigation measures to the standard. >> thank you so. >> oh, go ahead. >> supervisor kim. >> were you down with our prosecution. >> i think it's fine to go on with our questions we've continued with an elevated freeway here's why this is 2 the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
19
19
Oct 20, 2014
10/14
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 19
favorite 0
quote 0
their permits prior to 2008 so they're not necessarily held to article 28 maybe through the sequa mitigation so it's been a case by case that has brought us to a variance process this new amendments requires the department it 0 create a set of rules and regulations but up to now, it's one negotiated at a time. >> what do me over to our existing residence that have lived there prior to 2008 it won't be required to comply with that legislation is there something we can offer he in terms of the hoa are the developer were ready to comply with the standards? there would be no problem one thing an agency to get that communication >> i'd like to sit down with this and see what we know do for our larger buildings i know that resident are interested i would want to add my name a as a co-sponsor. >> that's wonderful. >> we're looking at our neighborhood near our freeways that's where the parcels are we have to look at the other policies to make sure our buildings are safe as possible. >> we've been be looking at the language we're skpg them to acknowledged reasonable person understand your rules 0 so
their permits prior to 2008 so they're not necessarily held to article 28 maybe through the sequa mitigation so it's been a case by case that has brought us to a variance process this new amendments requires the department it 0 create a set of rules and regulations but up to now, it's one negotiated at a time. >> what do me over to our existing residence that have lived there prior to 2008 it won't be required to comply with that legislation is there something we can offer he in terms of...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
34
34
Oct 26, 2014
10/14
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 34
favorite 0
quote 0
this we'll first produce an initial study to determine what is the appropriate level of sequa documentation mitigated deck versus eir so there's a preliminary where we gather the information we're not there yet. >> thank you commissioner johnson. >> thank you commissioner richards i think in a hypothetical situation where the study is done in the water and let's say there was no method of cleaning up the sediments that will preclude an impact on the soil at this point you'll need an eir because you'll have an impact that you can't mitigate so if we get to the point of secondary study they'll go through the whole list they did not make up the soil there's a whole category of things you can do and none of those things allow to you mitigate in the soil or another areas we'll be looking at a deck we're looking at an eir for this project hopefully it wouldn't need an eir if that's the case that totally you know x's out the work that was done through this project and i'll hope the puc will do the adequate work that could be the case. >> commissioners there's a we have a motion and a second to uphold the ne
this we'll first produce an initial study to determine what is the appropriate level of sequa documentation mitigated deck versus eir so there's a preliminary where we gather the information we're not there yet. >> thank you commissioner johnson. >> thank you commissioner richards i think in a hypothetical situation where the study is done in the water and let's say there was no method of cleaning up the sediments that will preclude an impact on the soil at this point you'll need an...