well, sergech lavrov is now speaking directly, well, will you even wake up, what are you talking abouts: hamas has not condemned, we say, seriously, there maryana zakharova says, hello, here you go, the resolution that proposed sobizum in my opinion to brazil, just with the condemnation of hamas, who vetoed it , usa, but the usa lies as fast as it breathes, in principle it is easy to determine when an american politician is lying, when he has lips move, this used to apply only to american lawyers, but now it can be extended to american politics, but not. on americanists, russians , there is no such thing here, what do they care about, but nothing worries them, nothing worries them, they only care about the continuation of this colonial system, where the united states is at the top, everyone else is actually in various forms of subordination , the european union is subordinate to everyone else, so when... by the way, so that it is generally clear with whom we have the thing is, there is someone who was once adored in russia, harari, who wrote several interesting books; the russian intel

would call it not a psychological or psychiatric illness, i would call it mental illness, when sergech lavrovcated with... his colleagues, diplomats and with members of the security council and with journalists. he gave an extensive interview to cbs and answered questions from reporters during a press conference. where do you think western journalists started talking to him, considering that his interview with cbs was before press conferences. this is what was sore, what was the main question that interested western journalists. trump? how do you know, vladimir rudolfovich. you know how this question was formulated. the first question, and this topic constantly came up in interviews, at press conferences , what’s going on with trump, they asked us, either us citizens or those who work in the us are affiliated with this very western political science information thought, you can you imagine what this is? let's see, you can say, well, maybe it's journalists who are always on the hot seat there's always something hot for something fried, here's trudeau. the prime minister of canada is, you know,

attitude from, let’s say, the united states of america, their allies, and the fact that today sergech lavrov the contacts that we have with these states are taking on wider and broader forms, and this will certainly bring benefits for both state members, it will serve as a very serious proposal or, let’s say, a very tempting idea for other states to join the member state, well , as far as i know, brix is ​​not planning to expand this year. but it has been postponed until next year, we still need to deal with these countries, plus we need to resolve a really very important issue, they talked a lot about the possibility of introducing a single currency, but now this topic has kind of faded into the background; they are already talking about other different mechanisms of mutual settlement, that’s what you think, how can my heart calm down here? bye that, vyacheslav alekseevich, the line is to use digital forms of one’s own currencies, the use of national currencies. advocated discussing this issue longer, while the recipe for the brix currency is obvious: it should be a reserve currency, it sho

for no reason, today there is a meeting of the council of security council, where there will be sergech lavrovouldn’t be a takgurisha, because at critical moments he speaks quite balancedly, yes, another thing is that he, like any western politician, is burdened. there is mutual responsibility there and so on, atlanticism in the pseudo-obligations that they have, in their heads, which is developing very strongly, which, by the way, allows this simple scheme to be realized, please note, the ukrainian authorities were constantly asking for ammunition before this, which flies further, yeah , a western politicians said, it must be given, and this is the result, it seems that further, this chain needs to be fixed, and i am sure that it is fixed, i... for his behavior over the past few years, guterres also says exclusively that i need to tell him that, as it seems to me, he is not an independent figure, unfortunately, although he should be completely, well, different, but due to the fact that he voiced this, does it mean that the west is beginning to systematically show ukraine its fatigue, here i a

sergech lavrov, please. yes, the topic.re the training of world-class specialists in the field of artificial intelligence. ministry of science of russia, together with the ministry of digital development of russia, educational organizations of higher education and the organization of higher education skolkovo institute of science and technology, implement a complex of the world aimed at predicting how war technologies will develop, which will receive a very serious advantage on the battlefield. if, for example, we predicted correctly, and the problems associated with fpv will be the first to start producing them en masse on their territory, we actually overtook the enemy by about 6-7 months, and accordingly this gave the result the company's loss in the summer of 2023. now it’s exactly the same, i can’t tell you the details. there is a struggle with intelligence, that is, who will correctly predict everything, and here, by the way , artificial intelligence , to a certain extent, also plays a fairly significant role, unfortu

, sergei lavrov made such an expression in his speech while there is still time, how do you understand this? by the way, i immediately wanted to say, and even wrote about this yesterday, sergechreservation that he was against russia, but i think that this is somehow clear to everyone. while there is time, absolutely true, since the continued financing of the war is on the side of ukraine, creates truly existential risks for the west, for the listed institutions, he only forgot berlin and warsaw, because after the kiev regime runs out or almost runs out of shells, just like they run out of people. the west will be forced to make a decision, i spoke about this back in the summer of twenty-two , whether to enter into this conflict themselves, or admit defeat, today i do not see a willingness in the west to admit defeat in any terms, if so, then hello, here you go you’re not telling me the most interesting thing, it’s just that at the end of the twenty-first year, when our demands were outlined, and more about... they will fall on the negotiating table with the west after victory in a special military operation , but they were voiced in order to prevent a military operation is wh