now sergei novikov is cleaning the cemetery, i'm sure the statue was standing.ht here at this crossroads, and they were able to carry it away from the cemetery due to the fact that cleaning was carried out territory according to him, an ancient monument, from which all the inscriptions have long been erased 10 years ago. they just threw it in the trash, there were three such statues, two side by side. approximately at this place, approximate and one stood in the area of ​​​​the crypt behind the central alley. well, at the top there was no longer a statue of victory, there was no fence and completely worn grave mounds. this case was all removed, because without registration there is not enough meat. we do not know whether this statue was really brought to the royal cemetery, but if the ancient idols in vain these mystical creatures are considered to be extremely dangerous look in a few minutes the owner of the wooden figure sued sergei novikov out of the ordinary, going out for ordinary people and even more so for the court. how to figure out if this idol really

the opera was written almost 150 years ago, director sergei novikov transferred all the main charactersto the 21st, but did it very carefully. that is, there is still an indian temple here. it is now a cultural center and it stands against the backdrop of skyscrapers, an interesting interpretation from sergei novikov in which he managed to combine, as well as traditional and indian trends. so is the current modernity and he managed to make some such collision of two worlds. remained and traditional dances, in order to better understand eastern culture, the choreographer of the performance, yuliana mahasyants, herself took lessons from indian dancers every gesture in indian dance. it means something, and i tried to use it all in the choreographic text. lagman was incredibly popular in europe, but now this name is not often seen on posters, and on the russian stage it is now actually the only such large-scale production, and you are the operator of a new, so to speak, new life before we have a lockmaker in our country this rarity is amazing. uh, well, wonderful music, subtle, refined, nob

the opera was written almost 150 years ago, director sergei novikov transferred all the main charactersneteenth century to the first, but did it very neatly. that is, there is still an indian temple here, it’s just that there is a cultural center in it and it stands against the background of skyscrapers, an interesting interpretation from sergey novikov in which he managed to combine both traditional and indian trends, as well as modern ones with the current one, and he managed to make some it's a clash of two worlds. traditional dances also remained, in order to better understand eastern culture, the choreographer of the performance, yulia malkhasyants herself, took lessons from indian dancers every gesture in indian dance. means something and i'm everything i tried to use it in the choreographic text, lagman was incredibly popular in europe, but now this name is not often seen on posters, and on the russian stage it is now actually the only such large-scale production of this new operation, so to speak, a new life before this wonderful. uh, well, wonderful music, subtle, refined, nobl

nikolai berdyaev and mikhail novikov boris vysheslavtsev and even earlier before them, and ivan bunin and vladimir nabokov and fyodor chaliapin left for dmitry merezhkovsky sergeianinov sergei prokofiev is the people who were needed by the country left. they weren't needed that power. who knew them, who did not accept. but they didn't disappear. they returned to russia's greatest immigrant culture and literature, music and philosophy. nobody kicked them out. they themselves are expelled. i repeat people. who were in the top at the top of popularity here they are needed by the country, what can they give? how can they return to the country what it has done for them? no, it seems to me that the country does not need them. they need that part of the elite. who with their hands with the help achieved their goals. their interests, which have nothing to do with the interests of the country. and now i want to focus your attention on one document of the pistol genre, which is discussed in society, as if, before it was discussed , the philosophical letter of pyotr chaadaev is a letter of the actor anatoly bely, nee weissman, we read. i can no longer be silent, perhaps i

nikolai berdyaev and mikhail novikov boris vysheslavtsev and even earlier before them, ivan bunin and vladimir nabokov and fyodor chaliapin left dmitry merezhkovsky sergeiprokofiev it was the people who the country needed left. they were not needed by that government. which they knew, which they did not accept. but they didn't disappear. they returned to russia's greatest immigrant culture and literature, music and philosophy. nobody drove them out. they themselves are expelled. i repeat people. who were in the top at the top of popularity here they are needed by the country, what can they give? how can they return to the country what it has done for them? no, it seems to me that the country does not need them. they need that part of the elite. who with their hands with the help achieved their goals. their interests, which have nothing to do with the interests of the country. and now i want to focus your attention on one document of the pistol genre, which is discussed in society, as if, before , the philosophical writing of peter chaadaev was discussed. this we read the letter of the actor anatoly bely, nee weissman. i can no longer be silent, perhaps