sense of reality and is ready to arrange a second chernobyl - russian deputy foreign minister sergei ryabkovaid on this occasion, the shells exploded on on the territory of the zaporizhzhya tpp, the thermal power plant is located in close proximity to the nuclear power plant and is very important for its stable operation, the nuclear power plant itself, according to the statements of local authorities, did not suffer from the level of radiation, which is now being measured, of course, shelling from the apu is constantly normal, and shells are fired every day . at the same time, they fall closer and closer to the station’s cooling systems and their waste storage, they say, the workers of the nuclear power plant in the ministry of defense directly accused kiev of nuclear terrorism air defense system around the station was transferred to an enhanced regime, the un calls for the creation of a demilitarized zone around the zaporozhye nuclear power plant. well, in moscow it says that this will only increase the risks of a nuclear catastrophe, the best guarantee that such a catastrophe will not hap

arrange a second chernobyl, i quote the words of the deputy minister of foreign affairs of russia sergey ryabkov at night, everything was shelled again, the city of energodar and the territory around the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, the protection of the station was strengthened, in the russian sets they warned, or rather the day before, but they warned today new ones are possible provocations of the kiev regime, and the shells exploded on the territory of the zaporizhzhya tpp - this is a thermal station, which is located in close proximity to atomic and which is very important for its stable operation. here the nuclear power plant itself, according to the statement of local authorities , did not suffer the level of radiation in the norm behind it. naturally. now shelling from the side of the armed forces is monitored every day, it is also recorded every day, while they hit accurately, the shells fall, eh. everything, closer to the station’s cooling systems and to the hmm waste storage facility in the ministry of defense directly accused kiev of nuclear terrorism, the air defense system aro

, ready to arrange a second chernobyl, i quote the words of deputy foreign minister of russia sergey ryabkovhe city of energodar, as well as the territory around the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, the protection of the plant was strengthened, the russian naboron warned warned . or rather, even the day before, but they warned today, a new provocation is possible.

prevent such a development of the event, deputy head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs sergey ryabkov started this, called the alliance’s policy destructive about confrontation with russia, a matter of the highest degree risky, according to the diplomat. the most important thing is to prevent a war between states possessing nuclear weapons. as ryabkov emphasized, russia can use such weapons only in response to aggression with the use of weapons of mass destruction, but at the moment, in the opinion of the deputy minister, dialogue between moscow and washington are not obvious because of the anti-russian policy of the united states ukraine is a black hole for billions of dollars, this opinion was expressed by readers of the news vic edition in response to an article telling about the decline in financial support for ukraine in july to kiev in the middle of summer. they promised only 1.5 billion euros. as a future aid, it is possible that they are not in a hurry to send finances to ukraine due to falling popularity ratings , such decisions are not added to politicians, but they will con

military guarding the station will they guarantee that such a scenario will not be realized, sergey ryabkovputy head of the ministry of foreign affairs, said today in the 60 minutes program. reckless with which our opponents play with nuclear security. uh pose a threat to the largest nuclear facility in europe with potential risks for a vast territory not only adjacent to this station a far beyond the ukrainian borders to the west of ukraine from ukraine and so on. this is lightness, evidence that people have completely lost the feeling reality and for the sake of their own political and geopolitical goals, they are ready to practice a second chernobyl kiev strikes at the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant for the americans, this was stated by the secretary of the security council and nikolai patrol. tashkent, he attended a meeting with the secretaries and security councils of member states of the shanghai cooperation organization. as patrushev noted , if the provocation of kiev leads to a man-made disaster, they will be held responsible for it. the united states and its allies with the suppl

well, for my part, uh, russian deputy foreign minister sergei ryabkov. e, said about. interview with izvestiya yesterday, he can hardly imagine negotiations with the united states on strategic stability in the face of the aggressive, uh, policy that the united states the states are holding on to russia yevgeny petrovich how do you assess the prospects for the start of these negotiations? and do you know if russia needs them now, let me start by answering your second question first. do russia need them in principle, of course, it is good to have an agreement. uh, i'm as simple as a person who has devoted many years of his service to this. it's good to have a treaty that u restricts, that provides transparency, that u allows you to be like what is called in the know on the other side. uh, i uh make a personal assessment, but it always seemed to me that the americans are interested, despite the fact that they say that we are more powerful, we have more money, as trump says, i have so much money that i can rivet these warheads, thousands, tens, or even hundreds of thousand

guarding the station guarantees that such scenarios will not be realized deputy foreign minister sergei ryabkovaid today on the air of our tv channel. reckless with which our opponents play with nuclear safety, but create threats to the largest nuclear facility in europe with potential risks for a vast territory not only adjacent to this station, but far beyond the ukrainian borders to the west of ukraine from ukraine, and so on. this is ease, evidence that people have absolutely lost their sense of reality and, for the sake of their own political and geopolitical goals, are ready to practice a second chernobyl. kiev strikes at at the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, the americans’ supply was announced by the secretary of the russian security council nikolai patrushev in tashkent, he took part in a meeting with the secretaries of the security councils of the member states of the shanghai cooperation organization, as patrushev noted, if kiev’s provocation leads to a man-made disaster, the responsibility for it will be borne by the united states and their the allies of the americans, the ukraini

i understand perfectly well that these are diplomats of such a level as sergei ryabkov.erious significant things that somehow change the angle of view on what is happening or what will possibly happen, but still i want to understand, and what , in fact, changes, but the face of the transformation of the united states towards the conflict. and where, that is, now they are not a party to the conflict, but a certain line will be transferred, and they will become a party to the conflict, and i i ask a question and many viewers are in favor of this. well, so what? here, what can change after they cross this line from our point of view and become a party to the conflict, or something depends on it. i want to say here that i saw his entire statement, so to speak in context. he answered the question about the article. here in this one in politics, and which was recognized by and large. the fact that the americans are using, well, they are leading highmaxes and then good for ukraine to strike at russian territories is a fairly commonplace. uh. here and here, respectively, he said

comrade of our program, a brilliant diplomat incredible level of minister of foreign affairs sergei alekseevich ryabkovth gratitude for finding the time to speak in our programs. now the main, hot topic is, of course, the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, the ukrainian regime accuses us of not allowing representatives of the mega-city to enter the nuclear power plant zelensky just recently accused us of striking at the territory in the immediate vicinity of the nuclear power plant. what is really happening, is there any plan of action and about the demilitarized zone, how do we feel about this? what is the essence of this idea? hello olga. glad. maybe in your program, but i'll start with the last story. e about the demilitarized zone. we hear not the first day all those who sponsor, the kiev regime provides him with political moral ideological support picked up this topic. uh, slanderers are written in one place. this is the seat of washington for the rest who work for support. kiev immediately perceives all this as a direct indication of a guide to action. that's gone e theme walk on mass media the fa

this is not here, and sergey ryabkov brings us back to reality.lity is arranged a little differently, no rich people, no un, no all these international stories or not. and there are them as the only guarantee that these peanuts do not fuss further, that's what the kiev leadership has lost a sense of reality on the issue behind s and is ready to arrange a second chernobyl, the presence of the russian military at the nuclear power plant, a guarantee that if the chernobyl scenario is not implemented, the establishment of a demilitarized zone around the nuclear power plant would lead to a further increase in risks. russia is determined to ensure that the visit of the magathen mission takes place, which means that the ukrainian leadership has lost, and he clearly has. well, he wants to speak simply, to say something, the problem exists, why the ukrainian side needs it. we all understand perfectly well, because the lack of real successes at the front, but it makes it necessary to create the appearance of some other, but successes and where we are gettin

on the brink of a direct military conflict, and today deputy foreign minister of russia sergey alekseevich ryabkovgs, said. listen to the destructive course of the nato countries to ignore our red lines and get involved in a confrontation with russia in ukraine , balancing on the brink of a direct armed conflict is extremely risky , it is obvious that this is fraught with further escalation up to a military clash of nuclear powers with andrey viktorovich how do you assess the risk of a direct military clash between russia and nato and why only experts, such as a dagger, talk about this risk in the west, while at the official level this risk is ignored. because they are preparing for it. and when they are preparing for something, it does not mean at all that it is necessary to advertise the experts, those people who understand this matter, they see it and talk about it. well, let's start from the stove, the first is the most important. this is because the weapon supplied. well, if you remove the javelins there, this or that, yes, that's all. the rest of the most problematic issue is hammer ammuniti

well, for my part, uh, russian deputy foreign minister sergei ryabkov. e, said about.tes on strategic stability in the context of the aggressive, uh, policy that the united states is pursuing towards russia evgeny petrovich how do you assess the prospects for starting these negotiations? and do you know if russia needs them now, let me start by answering your second question first. do russia need them in principle, of course, it is good to have an agreement. uh, i'm as simple as a person who has devoted many years of his service to this. uh, it's good to have an agreement that uh limits, which provides transparency, which allows you to be like what is called in the know on the other hand. uh, i'm giving my personal opinion, but i always thought that the americans are interested, despite the fact that they say that we are more powerful, we have more money, like trump says, i have so much money that i can rivet these warheads thousands tens or even hundreds of thousands. well, of course, this is an exaggeration. but, firstly, in such quantities they are needed. secondly,

direct military conflict, and today, among other things, deputy foreign minister of russia sergey alekseevich ryabkovfrontation with russia in ukraine by balancing on the brink of a direct armed conflict is extremely risky , it is obvious that this is fraught with further escalation up to a military clash of nuclear powers with the ensuing dire consequences andrey viktorovich how do you assess the risk of a direct military clash between russia and nato and why about this risk in the west they say only experts, such as the kesenger, and at the official level, this risk is ignored, because they are preparing for this. and when preparing for something does not at all mean that it is necessary to advertise the experts, those people who understand this matter, they see it and talk about it, well, let's start from the stove. first. the most important thing is because the weapons that are supplied. well, if you remove the javelins there, this or that, yes, that's all. the rest is the most problematic issue. this is hammerson ammunition, which, fortunately, we are now successfully finishing off in storage ar

this topic just explaining the russian step deputy minister of foreign affairs of russia sergey alekseevich ryabkov fact, looked like a frank provocation about the lack of normal air traffic due to the fault of the west, ignoring our requests to confirm the possibility of our aircraft flying with inspectors through the airspace of transit countries, visa problems during transit, difficulties with making payments for services during the inspection, and so on nikolay nikolaevich well , based on this. it seems to me that the biden administration is not in the mood for serious negotiations with russia on arms control. and he just wants to find a way to accuse russia a of trying to undermine the contracts with nv3 once again. and what do you think, you know, the whole logic of the development of events in recent decades related to ensuring strategic stability with ensuring control over nuclear arms. to say that the americans are not yet ready, they have not matured, they are not morally ready for constructive negotiations. after all, we have been for many years. losing one tool ensuring stability after