sergi, and mark zuckerberg, were they having to talk that happy to talk to you? mike: we have not met them yet. alec: we saw that larry and serge were wearing our shirts when they did the ice bucket challenge. emily: what is your take on the sexism issue in silicon valley? mike: it is kind of surprising to me that it took this long for anything like this to happen. ♪ emily: i wonder, is it strange critiquing silicon valley from hollywood? which is its own epicenter of anxiety and ego. alec: i think there are actually a huge number of similarities. we pitch pilots, entrepreneurs pitch startups to senior investors. we do season one and they do series a. it feels natural and there is no shortage of ego in either. emily: you often hear entrepreneurs say they are trying to change the world. what do you think they are doing? mike: some of them are making the world a better place. not to say that hollywood is better. i am sure that the top successful people in hollywood like j.j. abrams and chuck lorre are saying that their shows are making the world a better place by m

and then sergi. yes. >> thank you. u.s. european command. question to you about the information, the russian propaganda. it's clearly an effort we're not winning, and a lot of this is due to one, the unified nature of the russian information warfare, state run media. but also the fact that their propaganda isn't so much convincing, but making them doubt everything. even doubting the truth. besides pure capabilities. do you think our approach of countering their propaganda is working when frankly the populous is trying to influence is very cynical of anything to include the truth or do you think we need a new approach? >> okay, i want to exercise two options. first, the russian invasion, for example. and second, russian massive cyberattack. for example, against estonia, where a government is strongly reliant on internet and israeli government. in fact, all for example, very important financial in eastern europe. is this the case for article five? >> one more question or comment. gone. back to the panel. and you can conclude as well. >> yeah,