the seasoning to transport their equipment. we will talk about this later with us on the link serhii grabskyi military expert good evening i will start with this crossing, here we see that the russian forces they launched a ferry across the dnieper in kherson, but if the armed forces of ukraine managed to attack the antonov bridge. is it possible that such a crossing is somehow able to save or strengthen the russian army in kherson, but on the other hand, there are reports that they are using this password to strengthen their army, what do you say? the crossing will never in any way provide for these needs of the russian army, it must be understood that for the group that is currently located on the right of the dnieper network, you simply need 1,000 tons of cargo that should be transferred daily, we are talking about fuel, we are talking about ammunition, we are talking about dozens of other items, we need to transport equipment, we need to take out the wounded, and so on and so on and so on . crossing, and even from this capacity, it can be predicted that it is very limited in its carrying

what is happening around the zaporizhzhia npp and now let's move on to our next interlocutor, serhii grabskyi, a military expert, a participant in peacekeeping missions in kosovo and iraq, let's talk about what happened last week. by the way, let's start with the consequences of what happened around the crimea, about our successes and if these are our successes, that's also a question. we don't recognize that, the russians recognize only the west ceremoniously from the official ukrainian authorities, but such people about smoking as it changes the course of the war, this is bombing, shelling, shelling or sabotage, it doesn’t matter. well, you know the airfield with pods. he told me how military it is, well, it’s not that it didn’t comfort me a lot, but i approach it from an absolutely telepathic point of view, and that’s what 80 or even 85% of the tasks of combat fire damage are carried out by artillery rockets by troops, and only uh, uh, five, maybe 6, uh, belongs to aviation, so let's say that we destroyed 10-20 planes. oh, i'm sorry, we didn't destroy, not until we destroyed 10-20 planes,

missile version, they assume that it was explosives brought by saboteurs, but the military analyst serhii grabskyi version, i can say that there were no saboteurs with backpacks with explosives and there were no hummers. he assessed the number of explosions and the quality of them if we are talking about crimea. russian propagandists have called the strikes on crimea an atrocity and the detonation of ammunition, why exactly this version is the least painful for the kremlin, vitaly portnikov explains, representatives of the russian security forces do not want to report vladimir putin with this about the fact that ukrainians can act in crimea, the current russia is essentially based on the annexation of crimea, and of course any incidents in crimea are a blow personally powdered, they may not want to talk because they allowed such an accident, another reason for recognizing the failure in crimea russia can lose a lot of money on its invincible weapons, a potential buyer of russian junk looks at what they have and they have nothing , that is, the air defense system did not work. the equipment does no