serhii volodymyrovych, can you please? 7 minutes. vlasenko's speech , please move on to 7 minutes. thank you, dear mr. chairman , dear colleagues. professionally, about this draft law, in fact, the problem is that i will say a little, you know , maybe pathetic, but you know, i have been declaring since 2002, since 2002, i have been filling out the declarations that were written then my colleagues from the faction the motherland does the same thing, we voted for this law in the 14th year, we have no problems with it and we passed inspections , passed inspections normally. they put you in prison for real mistakes , you can't go to prison for mistakes, so my dear colleague from the neighboring faction said that someone will forget someone will forget to declare something if you forgot to declare you can't prosecute because it is about the presence of intent when when you hid something from the declaration then you can be prosecuted and only then i absolutely do not understand why the committee did not support a number of completely technical amendments, well, in particular , we are ta

skorokhod 24 serhiy vlasenko, that's why i don't take it into account , but take advantage of the moment colleagues, you know if we're talking about professionalism, then many of us need to take the book table theory of the state and law in order to cause confusion from the rostrum of the verkhovna rada, because if you do not understand what the difference between the concepts is, then you need to go back to your alma mater and study the theory of the state and law, because at the moment there are simply such questions that you do not even understand about what please say the next correction 264 will put it good next 289 good 289 please say what you can correct but the issue of offense and the issue of error are different things so i suggest to give all of us more millions of declarants have the opportunity to correct errors, i ask you to support this amendment, the voting side, the proposal to support the washing machine number 28, the position of the committee, please, and as such it contradicts our obligations to the international monetary fund and the european union, i ask my colleag

e-e time in the city of work last year, people's deputy from the homeland parliamentary faction serhiy vlasenko a decree that volodymyr zelensky terminated kolomoisky's citizenship. the corresponding decree never appeared on the president's website. despite this , on september 3 this year, the adviser to the head of the president's office, serhiy leshchenko , published a fragment on his facebook page. of suspicion that was handed to kolomoisky, it states that the businessman, a citizen of israel, said that leshchenko previously worked as a journalist and later was a people's deputy engaged in the case we can see that privatbank says that the published document is a real state that recognized the deprivation of kolomoisky's citizenship, so i don't understand why the information about the deprivation of citizenship should not cause any doubts. she is not subject to divorce in any country . they refused to comment on the issue of the businessman's citizenship. of october or bail of more than uah 500 million, according to the lawyer oleksandr lysak , kolomoiskyi, the bailee, will submit article 209

yes, his photo of this decree was published , and serhiy vlasenko actually confirmed that there is relevantre is a corresponding secret decree on the deprivation of citizenship, in particular, of igor kolomoisky, and then yurchyshyn, yaroslav yurchyshyn from the faction, the voice actually referred to the answer of the president's office and also spread this information, that is, it exists and is confirmed. and the truth is different , we understand the truth. yes, someone tells us that there is such a secret decree that everyone does not see. well, someone says there. well, yurchyshyn, what is there ? it's possible and you can believe, but serhii leshchenko believes in himself , he can't, and there is an assumption that there is such a decree and it probably really exists. it probably exists, but here it will turn out that the decree has not been implemented. it's as if the citizen was deprived of citizenship . but he has a passport walks around and acts as a citizen of ukraine and acts as a citizen in the procedural process, well, in court , he performs all procedures as a citizen of ukra

subsequently, people's deputy serhiy vlasenko published an allegedly relevant copy of zelenskyi's decree. let's talk about this matter further. vadym valko, a lawyer from the anti-corruption center, joined our broadcast. i congratulate you. congratulations. how do you assess the court's decision to keep kolomoiskyi in custody, is it really necessary, is there really a threat, for example that he can flee the country. well, directly the full text with the motives of the court. er, there is no, but it is obvious that in the case when the suspect is left in custody, er , well, even more so, the bail is quite significant, the court refers to certain risks that are provided for by law, this risk is possible concealment, and the court of first instance referred to the fact that kolomoiskyi has a passport of an israeli citizen, therefore he is not conscripted, he can leave the territory of ukraine, and it is free, and this is the possible risk transition is manifested, there was also a question: regarding the possible pressure on witnesses, and in particular in this criminal proceeding , which