rejected by the committee, please vote for 247, the amendment is taken into account next, serhii volodymyrovych zhytomyr, amendment 277, it refers to the example i mentioned, if you declare the property for several years and it does not change , you had an apartment of 70 m and it is located there, then you declare it for five years, if you have it checked once, then you do not need to check it the second, third , fourth, etc. for the umpteenth time, it is not necessary to force the declarant to confirm that he will already confirm the position of the committee , please editorially provide that the illegal cannot carry out a re-check except in cases of receiving new information, for example , what can it be when colleagues can be a decision the court may be a response to an international legal mandate and so on. this possibility should be left. therefore, i ask that this amendment be taken into account editorially . serhii volodymyrovych. i correctly understand that you propose to fully take into account yes. okay. i am putting to a vote serhiy volodymyrovych vlasenko's proposal to fully take into accou