use them on populated areas, on the civilian population, this is a rather difficult situation, sir serhiulogorivka and the battles in the area of ​​this already legendary settlement, please repeat the question, belogorivka, it is not in our lane, i 'm sorry, that one. i do not have the information, mr. sergey, i would also like to ask you about the needs of the troops in the leman direction, what is actually the priority right now, in terms of the needs of our military, we understand that it's such a technical struggle right now, more so and at least with the units that we're talking to that tap into our ether, we're hearing that there's a huge demand right now for drones and by means of rap, i understand that the situation is probably not different in your direction, but we would like to... understand how closed this demand is now and what does the enemy have to do with it? it can be said that in winter, when there was a pause in the supply of cartridges, shells, and ammunition for the ukrainian army, drones have become the main force that has allowed us to contain the offensive, by and

serhiu, now the convention of the republican party is being planned, because we mentioned trump. petro poroshenko has been invited to the convention, the chairman of the verkhovna rada has not signed off on this trip for more than a month, so how will we then be friends with the republicans so that this agreement is not revised? actually, we have ratified agreements are interstate, this agreement is not ratified, but there is the experience of france, for example, president macron has submitted the same agreement to the parliament. for the parliament to approve such an agreement at the level of a resolution, so it is obvious that this ukrainian-american agreement is very often called an analogue of the american-israeli security agreement, which essentially began with the same declarative norms, but with a declarative form, but i would said that it's a kind of... more of a conceptual agreement, it's a confidence-building agreement, and here, when it's done publicly in front of the whole world, one does not back down from one's word in the principle of democracy, let's remember how

serhiu, well if draws such parallels, then today we find... even on the eve of the first world war, andu remember how long the world was swaying then, especially during the balkan wars, everyone believed that there would be absolutely no threat, no pose no threat to europe, in fact it was just the beginning of the first world war, which further caused the balkans to catch fire, and then the whole of europe. just as the final point of the first world war, the paris conference itself set the stage for the second world war. so, if you look to the logic of today's decisions made by many world leaders, the first thing i can say is that they did not teach history like this. secondly, if we talk about the actions taken by these same people, then they look more like people who continue to live in the pre- war period and do not feel this threat, which today looms over the world, and the voices are such as petraeus or other military personnel who understand the situation, who, by the way, are also wrong, because the expansion of the combat zone will begin not only and not so much, because the füh

serhiu, you know, we just had a conversation on various... near the russian border areas and in the sumyion and kharkiv region , shelling has significantly decreased, can we explain this by the fact that we now have an open permission to destroy both missile launchers and anti-aircraft missiles and everything else on the territory of russia, or is it with a statement is it related to any specific strikes that have changed the life of sumy oblast and kharkiv oblast in the last week? well, we really know what the enemy has been accumulating. forces there in sumy region, kharkiv region, we know about the enemy's attempts to carry out offensive actions there, we know that with on may 10 and beyond, active counteroffensive actions, counteractions with ours were carried out. side , they significantly reduced the russian potential, including using strikes on the accumulation of russian forces, on equipment warehouses that were located on russian territories adjacent to our sites, this of course affected the russian offensive potential, but now i think that after significant losses, the enemy is

serhiu , but do all the residents of the temporary yar understand that it is the russians who are beingeased in this way, because there is probably some part of the people who were waiting for them, or are still waiting, well, you know, as they say... in the family it is not without ugly, i think, unfortunately, there are such, but frankly, as possible to understand such people who see when they destroy your city, your home, and then wait for them, well, this is at least something, some problems with the head, otherwise i won't even say, is there still some part of the people? who, even under such conditions, live in temporary yeru, so at the moment there are 660 people left in the community, they do not live in a concentrated manner, they live in different microdistricts of the community, this is the central shevchenko, zhovtnevy, well, they are scattered in all areas of our community, even in kalynivka, unfortunately, there are still civilian residents, and how their daily lives? they stay, continue to live in the community, their daily life, what does it look like? well, it ’s probab

serhiu, well, look, if we talk about brics, here russia, in my opinion, how that interoffice widow cuterself, they are now. threw into the world the thesis that look, brics is, er, the future powerful sla, which covers there, it is not known how many billions of population there and so on, and so on, and so on. and let's join, some joined, but now what happened in nizhny novgorod, they could not agree on any foreign policy declaration, where it was that they act as a united front and so on, why? well, because there are just two such small countries, one is called china, the other is india, which are like a cat and a dog, and this means that... there will be no unity there by definition, but russia now finds itself in a situation where she announced that it would be the new navel of the earth, it was being released, and nothing that she had planned for herself would actually happen, that is, you see, you can model different and build different structures, but they are not viable, because they are not united by one goal, each of these... these brics member countries has its own interests

serhiu, and we... we just imagine exactly what we know, do ukrainians know the principles, criteria,of nato, because we are so sure about it we say, but the specifics of the first, second, third, fourth rule, the first, second, third principle, the first, second, third criterion, i do not hear such, you know, public discussion on this matter, i do not hear that there are simply people, they say , this criterion is good, or we have reached it, and others will say, no, not yet. or they will say, we usually already know this like you, and others will say, we don’t know yet and so on, this is some kind of abstraction, maybe the generals know, but the ukrainian society doesn’t know about it, maybe it’s worth spreading the knowledge more widely that it is necessary for ukraine to join nato in a short period of time after the end, i hope, of the victory of ukraine, the war, now this is some kind of abstraction, i apologize for the long question, mr. serhiy, well... that's right, public control over these processes is important here, so that society would better understand these processes, w

serhiu, comes down to the geneva peace formula conference, right? well, i want to know, or rather, i want to ask one thing, i want ukrainians to at least know about the president's theses, well, what kind of conference is this in the interests of ukraine, about which neither you, nor i, nor ordinary ukrainians who do not have such time to follow politics, do not know. they don't know what we are proposing there, perhaps we should first speak in the parliament and state the president's position, get the support of the parliament, at least its political leaders, and then we will become stronger and go to geneva. to be honest, the support of all political and public leaders of ukraine, the support of fighting heroes is more important than the arrival of the cape verdean delegation. or east timor, honestly, the president would become stronger. i am sure that the opposition is patriotic and supportive any pro-ukrainian peace plan, even if it will be difficult. but when they go there, and we don't know with what, it causes me anxiety, because i saw the is

journalists they did not remain silent and told other colleagues about it, well, the head of the komi serhiut silent either, i will add a few words, which is important, we have a precedent with ukrainform, but you do. do you understand why i mentioned the television marathon, i think, sergey, you, and you, andriy, and our colleagues, other journalists, have acquaintances who work within the framework of the television marathon, and believe me, i talked about this topic with them, there are the same dungeons and a number of guests who cannot be invited, we even discussed the topic of this or that guest there, who would be interested to be shown to a large audience, after conversations with the editors of the tv channels, these guests were not shown, because they might say something that... would play into the hands of the authorities, which is why i mentioned the television marathon and the option, in principle, of absolutely political censorship, which exists in on a large, large scale on television. yanina, and conversely, i want to say that the authorities have blacklists of tv channels th