on ... public szh, that is, voluntary abandonment parts now here is the story of journalist serhiy gnizdilov, who served in the 56th separate motorized infantry brigade, he announced the szh, there they appointed an official investigation and declared that the military man had committed actions that contained signs of a criminal offense. on the one hand, it is clear that there is current legislation. assumes responsibility for the szch, and on the other hand, in conditions where the terms of demobilization and rotation of military personnel who have been in the war for the third year, and some for the 11th year, are not clearly prescribed, a lot of questions arise for these servicemen themselves, as well as serhiy gnizdilov, what if it doesn't work out and there are no rules that he would, which he would follow. as to when he can be demobilized there, then this is the szh, or it can lead to negative results in the army, when, well, if serhiy gnizdilov avoids this responsibility, these cases will be repeated, and these cases will lead to the fact that on at some stage, the fighters of the arm

for the 11th year, there are a lot of questions from these same military personnel, who have serhii gnizdilovat if it doesn't work out that way. and there are no rules that he would, that he would follow, regarding when he can be demobilized there, then this szh arises. could this lead to negative results in the military, when, well, if sergey gnizdilov avoids this responsibility, these cases will be repeated, and these cases will lead to the fact that at some stage... fighters from the armed forces of ukraine will begin to leave their positions, well, some of them. if you don't know how to act, act according to the law. and as far as i'm concerned, it's obvious. if hnizdilo has committed a crime, he must answer according to the letter of ukrainian legislation. and there can be no misunderstandings. and what about the need to rotate ukrainian servicemen, who are each 2.5 years old. it is obvious who fulfills the duties of military service more. let us recall our modern historical experience. between 2014 and 2017, ukraine conducted six waves of mobilization and, accordingly, demobilization. i

why did we invite mr oleg, because we learned that serhii gnizdilov is a soldier of the motorized infantry brigade. wrote on facebook that he arbitrarily left the part to draw attention to the need to establish a term of service for the mobilized. and the question arises, is this voluntary abandonment of a part, or is it desertion, and what is the difference between the first and the second, what would that mean? you see now this man in front of you, he is standing and explaining to the journalists what he would like to explain. and on this occasion. just oleg lionti, a military lawyer, what is the difference, mr. oleg, between arbitrary leaving of the unit and desertion. the difference lies in the purpose pursued by the serviceman when he voluntarily left the place of service without valid reasons, or did not return to his place of service after being discharged, on leave, or on medical treatment. the difference lies in the purpose, the purpose, that is, desertion is meant, the serviceman aims to completely evade military... service, that is, he left, and that was it, he could even leave,

, which caused a lot of discussion and divided society into two parts: we are talking about serhii gnizdilov's statement about what is going on in the szh, made it's officially at a crowded event, and probably meant to get as many people as possible to hear it at once. and to encourage, accordingly , discussion and certain decisions in the supreme to the council, at least, maybe the general staff is also talking about a person who simply said that he is going to the szz, since the situation with demobilization and with rotation is unknown, there are no specific terms, some ukrainians condemned such behavior, others say in a different way than that this is how to attract attention and, accordingly, some clear boundaries about demobilization. and here it is important and it is important for us to ask, we did not find a single military officer who would publicly support this self-wolf, pr self-wolf, on the contrary, the goal was probably precisely to divide society, because the previous series called i dodged, now the wolf has run into it, and it is precisely the civilians who are publicly trying

with a military man, a soldier of the 56th separate motorized infantry brigade of mariupol, serhii gnizdilovlong and painful post. in this post, he said that he is going to the szch, voluntarily leaving the unit, and he is leaving because they have not yet established clear terms of service. and actually, about this decision, what prompted it, we will ask all of you, sergey, and we are waiting for it to appear on our airwaves. let's talk about the ukrainian infantry, and you know, yesterday i talked to yehor firsov, who also went to defend the country, and he says that what is happening now with the ukrainian infantry, it is already losing its strength, and he says, i am not saying this for clickbait, but if nothing is invented, how to replace people, how to give people a rest, well, we are facing a disaster, that's what serhiy and i will talk about. is mr. serhiy here yet, not yet, dear friends, he is not there yet, we wanted and want to give him the floor also on the air, wrote a serviceman of the 56th the mariupol separate mechanized brigade said yesterday that he has been fighting since

not published. thousands of servicemen in ukraine voluntarily left the service, one of them is serhii gnizdilov, he did it publicly as a sign of protest, he demands clear terms of service and fair mobilization. opinions of observers, so to speak, were divided. some say that hnezdilov's behavior will have very bad consequences and that his actions may motivate others to do the same. others support and hope that now the issue of setting a clear deadline. services will finally move from a standstill. my name is vlasta lazur. this is svoboda life. therefore, the serviceman of the 56th separate motorized infantry brigade of mariupol serhiy gnesdilov announced that he is going to sezche, that is, voluntarily leaving the military unit, in order to draw attention to the need to establish terms of service for the mobilized. hnezdilov himself left volunteered for the armed forces of ukraine in 2019 . he took participation in battles in donetsk region, including sands and bahmut. now he says, hnizdilov, he is absolutely ready for the consequences and that he can be detained at any moment. serhiy's action

prescribed. a year at war, there are a lot of questions for these of the servicemen themselves, who serhiy gnizdilov has, what, if it doesn't work out and there are no rules that he would, which he would follow, regarding when, when he can be demobilized, then this szh arises, or it can lead to negative results in the army, when, well, if... serhii nizdilov avoids this responsibility, these cases will be repeated, and these cases will lead to the fact that at some stage the fighters from the armed forces of ukraine will begin to leave their positions, well, some, and if you don't know how to act, act according to the law, and i don't care obviously, if the nester has committed an offense, he must answer according to the letter of the ukrainian legislation, and here he cannot... there may be some misunderstandings, but what about the need to rotate ukrainian military personnel, who serve for 2.5 years, who serve more duties of military service, then... it is obvious. let us recall our modern historical experience. between 2014 and 2017, ukraine went through six waves of mobilization and, accordingly,

citing sources in law enforcement agencies, reports that gnizdilov is now in the hospital. and the suspicion has not yet been announced to him, serhiyay before in an interview with babel once again explained why he decided on szch and why he did it publicly? it seems to me that the state does not care how many people there are come on, it doesn't matter, she just chose the strategy of not communicating it, then what's the point of your statement if she doesn't pay attention to anything, first of all, this issue has not been forced in society for more than eight months. ugh, they decided to put it on the shelf and shut up. i did my best to get this issue discussed again in society, as much as i could. i partially agree with masinej that this is a very, well, a very radical step. but again , the state left me no other tools. i have been talking about this for over a year wherever he could. i kept stressing that we need normal mobilization, and we need replacement and rotation, if only, if only. i serve in the infantry, i do not see people in the infantry, they are not there, everything is held on by a very thin thread, and at any mome

serhii, they say, highlighted a problem that everyone knew about, but pretended that nothing was happening. it is possible... but now his act is prompting the authorities to change. gnizdilov himself stated in his social networks that, according to his data , 80,000 servicemen in ukraine are located in the nw. radio liberty hopes to receive a comment from the ministry of defense on this matter since yesterday, but they have not responded. well, we hope that the ministry of defense, the general staff, the verkhovna rada, the committee, especially of the verkhovna rada, which is specialized in matters of defense and intelligence, will give an answer to... this question will be communicated somehow, but there was already a reaction to this from roman kostenko, for example, a people's deputy from the defense and intelligence committee, a representative of the voice, he said that indeed, the lack of clear terms of service is a big problem, what about it, what are they thinking about it, what to do about it, but they say that mobilization is getting worse right now and that clear terms of service should be established right now, or somehow write down completely transparent and..