severin campbell from the budget and legislative analysis's office. i just have a brief presentation on the reports we submitted on two of the budget priorities identified by the board, affordable housing and homelessness. and i also want to say from our office, monica and carl are here, who are the ones who actually wrote these reports. there were actually three main areas that were identified by the board members in terms of their budget priorities. so in terms of affordable housing, there were also some specific requests for information on-site acquisition, displacement -- antidisplacement measures, housing for seniors, people with disabilities, veterans, and workforce housing. abag, association of bay area governments sets housing goals for the region. san francisco was given a seven-year housing goal of 27, almost 28,000 newhousing units. over the first year, the city has permitted about 60 sites of these houses. but if you look at the chart, here are the goals. our report actually tended to focus on the funds, and we will talk about this as we g

severin campbell from the legislative analyst's office. if you look at table one on page five of our report, the city's share of costs actually for the c.b.d. would be about 30% out of a budget of a little -- about $3.4 million in 19-20. the city's cost would be about $975,000 for the various buildings in the civic center, and we recommend approval. >> supervisor mar: thank you, miss campbell. colleagues, any -- do you have any questions or comments about items one and two? so i understand -- well, there was a request for a motion to amend item 2. >> clerk: the amendment as stated by mr. corgis was to change the hearing date to june 25, 2019 in this building at 3:00 p.m. >> supervisor mar: so can we move to amend item 2 without objection? and colleagues, can we recommend these items to the full board without objection? >> supervisor peskin: as committee reports. all right. mr. clerk, please call item three. >> clerk: agenda item number three is a hearing on the city's collection and analysis of sexual orientation and gender identity data.

when i asked severin campbell about that statistic and why it didn't change, she said yes, the people might be handed a piece of paper for a referral, but the referral may be a waiting period of a few months. to her, it feels like the person is just released without any sort of follow up, which seemed reasonable to me. and i just wanted to get your response to that. this isn't be blaming, this is about figuring out what we need to advocate for. so we know the truth -- the more we know the truth, the more we know how to fix it. to me, that felt like a valid reason for not changing the statistic. >> when someone is kn. >> chair nuru: -- when someone is new to our system, what we do is provide them with a referral to the behavioral health access clinic or btac. they can go in and walk right in or call and speak directly 24-7 to a clinician on the phone or walk in and get an assessment that day, and as was mechanicsed, they'll be asseted for level of care in the system. ousht washt care, whether it's residential or mental or substance abuse. and then, an appointment would being setup for