we resize 49 seward across the street from 50 seward. when it was for sale in 2015, we walked through it. the layout in the house is outdate the and awkward. any new owner will want to gut the interior to create more useable floor plan. we would like to make it clear to the commissioners today that we do not oppose renovation and we acknowledge that the house needs lot of work to might it useful for family living. the debate is about the scale of the proposed renovation. when our neighbors introduced their plans in 2017, we were shocked see they created a design to build to the maximum extent on the property and to dramatically increase the square footage of the building to approximately 5000 square feet. we as well as other neighbors who are here with me today, provided our input during the process in 2017 and afterwards including a meeting we had last night. our specific concerns with these plans are outlined in our d.r. application which hopefully the commissioners read. i will sum up these details in one sentence. the proposed height

i'm not opposed to construction at 50 seward street.he project sponsor could add height to the home. everyone should be allowed to renovate as needed. i don't believe that the law namely the planning code requirement for the residential design guidelines to govern here is on the project sponsor side. my partner and i purchased our home in april 2018 after considering several homes. we like the mediterranean field of spanish feel of the homes. we weren't able to purchase a home in the area. we were able to purchase the condo unit where we reside 49 seward. please see the photos i have brought here for your record, showing the subject homes on seward street. the project sponsor response to the d.r. application goes on about the space their family has. between what the project sponsor wanted to do with their home to purchase it, what i expect seward street it look like when i purchased my home in 2018 i have the stronger argument. why? because the residential design guidelines are availably to everyone to review before purchasing a home. o

you seward the real story of the switch from the police. and the british will some appropriate are supposed to be so you could be true to seem you think you smoke weed most books with. your story when you know should go to screw you all so much you be unusable. the books one could prove you know. and good you wish for was before to so. much of those who heard it simply deal with most of you who refuse to see. we will. go into more of. that she. was yes wishing passage. reached a deal in the senate that's not love that she. said i don't think that's. funny it's not. precious aggression it's a small budget. you can also don't buy us made a. duck and you just do. this move cuckoo sure to. start a new project. you want. to build. more nuclear. watchdog. on. an aborted landing the cosmonauts were supposed to land in the step but instead touched down in remote woodland it was only the sight of people strolling around the spaceship the diffuse the tension a little obviously it was only a drill. looked at missouri and we it was one you used to do b

you seward the real your the german the policeman the star you know the british will slow pollute. you see it could be true the same you've been wanting to slow cook with most books we're. used to it too we know should go too much 3 years so much to be unusable. the books one could do with you know who. knew what you could use. to build your wish for the globe was before the bulk you were so. much of those who had exhibited you with my future you should see him when you. were both of them and you might explode with a modem and with. 3 girls in the saloon 3 of them so moved which the group. of folks moved pretty. that ship. being in love that you could not break the law was yes wishing package. bargain. teacher mrs reached a deal in the senate that's not love that should pass so i don't see. the funny sometimes it's not over. the documents. but. you can also tell you by just made a. duck in your face do. this move cuckoo sure to. move east to. start a new project. you want. to kill. them or what you. thought. was. an aborted landing they cosmonauts were supposed to land in the step

you seward the real deal the switch from the police to. the british royals from the polluters to you so you could be true to seem you think you slow cook with most books with. you when you know should go to your so much to be unusable. the books one could believe you know. was before the bulk of those. missionaries who had exhibited you with my future used to see him when you. were both of them and you might explode from all them and was. the swarms. of. books. that ship the crisco. that you're not going into the arts. wishing package. if. the chicken is reached a deal into then you have much no love match of brush so that it's. funny that it's not. the.

michael seward, chair defazio, and the written testimony from the association of professional flight attendants. no objection, so ordered. with that, turn to chair defazio for an opening statement. >> thank you mr. chairman. this is of course our second hearing. i don't inc. we should be here today. i don't think 346 people should have died. i believe that this was preventable. we have family here today, who lost a daughter. we will hear from them in a future meeting. but, there are a lot of questions that still remain unanswered. and we are pressing forward with this is a very comprehensive investigation. a lot of it leads back to the organization delegation authority process, certification process. the question about the role of engineers in this process, versus that of operators, pilots, and other safety professionals who work on those planes. it is inexplicable to me, and i asked in the first hearing, i asked the acting administrator, i said, is this a safety critical system? mcas. he said yes. and my question was then, how can we allow a safety critical system with a single poin