go in the same older >> i'm john arnold a member of the 350 sf and speaking in support of the clean sf i'm representing myself. the issue with the clean power sf being dropped out of the report is frustrating to marrying me. i've been a resident of san francisco for two decades. i've seen generations of renewal energy be supported in proposition and many multiple referendum. it's clear that has wide support in the city. conservation is absolutely essential but you have to have both sides of the kindly. in addition to the global bad stuff supervisor avalos is nicely summarized those are jobs those are attempts to free our city from an industry that's a fossil in many sense of the word. it has to be done. we used to be the city that knew how i think it's time to take a leadership position again. thank you. thank you. next speaker. >> hello, i'm thomas ray a native san franciscan. i'm speaking for different environmental groups in this city. i really feel that san francisco doesn't differ the title as the number one sustainable city in the u.s. because it's not doing enough and especially

(chanting). >> thank you sf island. and with that colleagues why don't we go to the rest of our agenda. item 26 is a motion to confirm the reappointment term ending february 2018 to the treasure island board of directors. colleagues, can we take a roll call vote >> supervisor farrell. supervisor kim. supervisor mar. supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. supervisor yee. supervisor avalos. supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor chiu. supervisor cowen. there are 11 i's. this motion is approved item 27 >> is a motion to conform the reappointment from the mayor's office to the treasure island development authority board of directors. >> supervisor yee. >> thank you supervisor chiu. i wanted to make a remark on item 26 i realized it passed by but it's similar. i want to express from the rules committee my support of vivian for her reappointment to the treasure island redevelopment authority. vivian brings with her a record of achievement in urban planning and development. we're blessed to have her for her dedication to

once we get clean sf moving forward we will have access to millions more dollars of energy efficiency funds through that program. it's easier to get funds through the ccup once you have a cca going forward. that's one of the big ones and it's a good example. the san francisco public utilities commission, we've said this to them in public comment, they seem to be not recognizing it and they are continuing to not do any work on clean power sf, even though the lafco is proceeding because the lafco gets it. we know that you get it and we also know your staff get it, i'm not up here to demonize staff. staff has been very clear that clean power sf is necessary to the city meeting its action goals, necessary to the clean action strategy and had it not been from signals from the mayor's office to kill this program when it shouldn't be and when you can get more funds from it, staff wouldn't have felt like they had to leave it out of the climate action strategy. with that said, we and others spoke at the policy committee meeting a while back to make clear that the climate action strategy needs

i was stated to the record that green power sf should go back to the report. so colleagues if there are in other questions or comments supervisor avalos can we file that and can we continue to the call of the chair >> so is there a motion to continue item 3 to the call of the chair. >> i'll make to motion. >> and we'll take that without objection. colleagues, we did madam clerk - i think with respect to item number 2 i understand from the city attorney that given the amendment proposed supervisor kim it has to be drafted and continued two weeks instead of 1 week we need to resend the vote >> resend? >> jib i suggested to her from our problematic it will be better to resend the vote on the duplicate item and continued and . >> does the clerk need to formally call the item again. we have forwarded the unamended version to the full board of supervisors that will remain but with respect to the duplicate item we amended could i have a motion to resend this vote to continue? without objection could i have a motion to resend the amended amendment for 2 weeks without

and the first thing that i want to point out that is sf 72 is more than just a fresh new website, or beautiful set of portfolios that you have before you. it is actually a shift in the way that we talk about preparedness with our community instead of focusing on disaster, and the things that you must do and so bad things will not happen to you, we focus on something more powerful and more important. and that is the power of community. and of course, preparedness is about getting your supplies together, but it is also about knowing your neighbors, and lending a hand and sharing knowledge. why? because past emergencies from sandy to tauku have proved that strong, connected communities are more resilient and so let's take a look at one of the platforms that we have and that we are using to build a more resilient san francisco. >> sf72.org this provides tools and support to people to help to connect to the neighbors as well as prepare for the emergencies we launched this website on october 17th of last year and the 24th anniversary of the earthquake and it consists of four primary sectio

and that's what we've been doing in the hope sf program to mechanic at the infrastructure as we've than what happened the staff in revising all of our public housing i thank hud and leaders nancy pelosi they're helping me to establish the leadership with wood we have a new model to invested in people's buildings first once we offer them ways to train for the future jobs in the future and a series of services on site that have involved the hucht and fire department and youth engagement programs all on site that investment pays off now i've got a belief in a basis to have hope. this is what we're doing together in revoilg our public housing spaces. i want to thank a development team jon stewart company you've been wonderful and really making some great, great headway on this (clapping.) you have a strong team the richard housing corporation has been there delivering the highest quality and john was saying i get questions how much are you charging for those condos (laughter) that's a pretty good compliment in the world we're rebuilding community. our if at any point tropic people have help

live in sf jw k4n. >> reporter: >> pam:p-g&e pleaded 'not guilty' in federal court today-- to charges stemming from the deadly san bruno blast. >> pam:the indictment alleges. the utility company knowingly violated safety requirements. a portion of a pipeline ruptured and caused an explosion and fire in 2010. the fireball killed eight people. injured dozens of others. and destroyed 38 homes. the utility company could face a six -million dollar fine, if convicted. company officials were not specifically named in the indictment. >> pam:p-g&e said. it does not believe any employee intentionally violated federal pipeline safety regulations. .. >> pam:new tonight at 8-- >> pam:we have an update on the investigation into the death of hiker in marin county last week. the body of 50-year-old marie sanner was discovered on april 17th. she was the second female hiker to die on mount tam in just the past month. kron 4's charles clifford is live tonight in the north bay with details. charles? >> reporter:well monday afternoon, the marin county sheriff's department released a statement saying that

the next speakers with one of our partners in crime he and i worked tireless also ferry the sf project i'd like to invite rich from the enterprise partners to join us >> thank you honestly i'm not sure which view is better i'm glazing at the city and turnout and s see this magnitude project. one the drawbacks of being the last speakers is everything has been said but there are definitely some clear themes that are important here and it's throughout the speakers and the history of hope sf about that keeping projects and that's been said a second one is patients. and while the residents shouldn't need to have pains that's one of the keystones of hope sf we can joke at enterprise the shirts are more expensive than we can image. one of the things a theme through all of this is tromg lives. we have some of the worse housing in the country her and some of the most isolated families and seniors we must take responsibility in san francisco. another theme that's important is about government could go what government does best and i want to say that clearly mayor ed lee has lead this initiative

i want to reiterate our thanks to sf staff and as we move forward with our partners to advocate 0 for funding to make sure those - courage more people to walk in san francisco. thank you (clapping.) thanks north america coal it's welcome and it continues to push us for the record. we're luck n i didn't in the city when it comes to public safety we have two of the finest chiefs in the country i wanted to thank chief joanne and his wife and other first responders. we want to reduce the workload for them as part of the process i want to thank that staff and our real efforts there's safety and engineering and at the sfmta we play a supporting role and that's in improvement we can there's a lot we can do with the data we have and a lot we can do to design our streets better a lot we can do to make more people aware everyone needs to not pay attention to trodden device but need to make sure that people are following the laws that's one of the most important things we can do to make the roads safer. the chief behind that for the has been helped by board of supervisors that have added police

and who are pushing us to move faster and the leading voice we have in n that regard comes from walk sf a small and power energetic associations that helps to make san francisco the great place for walking please join me in walk sf nicole smooirth >> thank you all i'm so honored to be here standing beside our mayor and the board of supervisors who have is shown their leadership and many how more this is a dream for pedestrian advocates to be standing beside so many leaders who are an advocate. this is a change i want to draw attention to the city staff i want to give them a really big round of applause (clapping) walk first is a way for us to get to vision zero, zero traffic fatalities in one year this year as others have said our dangerous street are 6 percent of our injuries. we can strategically focus our money to those dangerous you are dangerous streets walk first helps to address those through the low-cost treatment and we're excited to see those following supervisor jane kim's lead on 6th street and market street. too many lives have been lost and i'm really excited to hear the m

sf corrected dot organize is a again way to get checked. this is how you, get trained there are a number of centers throughout the city. having internet service in our home will provide controls stunts. you only need a few steps to get checked in no test test test. >> good afternoon, welcome to our rules committee meeting for thursday, april 3. i am supervisor norman yee and i will be supervising this meeting. i am joined by supervisor kitty tang, supervisor is on his way. jennifer low and jessie larson, who record each of our meeting and make the transcripts available to the public online. so madam clerk, are there any announcements? >> please make sure to silence cell phones and any electronic devices. items acted upon today will appear on the april 15th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> i am glad to see all of you here today. i'm going to see if i can stall this for another 30 seconds to give supervisor campos a chance to make the sprint over here. would you like me to sing a song for you guys? i will get started. s

sf g has complieptd with and continues to observe the measures. sf g has begun this to phase one the assessments have been insinuated and on february 11th it prepared an investigation report and now we're working on the site mitigation plan it's going according to process and following the mitigation measure further it will go through the dust there the air quality division and this is the best dust mitigation measure so the project will be subject for dust control and hazardous dust removal. appellant raises concern about the construction on the club but this was addressed and the construction in san francisco is very common no unusual circumstances no underpinning of the vertical club it will be the same foundation so no underpinning is necessary if f even if it were necessary it is protection for the building in san francisco. future the planning commission adapted the vertical club protection providing barriers for the training club for the contractors to protect the vertical club during the construction and conducting an analysis in order to

to be like, but i want to bring this back to march of last year when our presentation on clean power sf was given to you and your staff and interim director assmann wisely and rightly said he and his staff were ready, willing and able to go forward with this office and this department doing extensive work on clean power sf, even above and beyond energy efficiency. and so my call on this is that if you have trouble deciding who to hire or you've got candidates that are not quite where you want them to be, i would just ask you to do everything in your power to convince interim director assmann to stay on. i don't know what it will take to convince him to that, he probably is looking forward to getting up into the mountains and hiking and stuff but it sure would be nice to have somebody that is clear in their head about an important program like clean power sf to be staying on in the direction of the department. thanks. >> are there any other public comments to the closed session that we're about to have? seeing none, i will close public comment regarding the closed session and so that lea

i want to thank the sf d for having the third annual dinner for the lgbt families are welcome it will take place tomorrow at the at&t kiss middle school her in san francisco. families you do not need to register you can contact eric at the phone number 2622014. i will be joined by many of the commissioners and we look forward to breaking bread with you. i will to congratulate ourlogically high school on their 8 place at the mock trial in senate file california. in the did second top 10 finish and a testament to the great leadership to mr. chang congratulation to our lowell high school students. finally i'll speak about the national certified board teachers but i want to thank the support for families for they're wonderful event this past saturday where we brought together hundreds of families to learn about and work together with students with sdrablthdz commissioner norton and thank you for others. it was really trial expiring to see the students coming together in the education of their parents so how many years is this commissioner norton >> it's a lot. >> over 12 to 15 years so th

wong appeared and said it at&t's application was in corners with the technical requirement of the sf order. at the end of the hearing the hearing officer can do a couple of things make a recommendation or if he upstairs it's appropriate he can hold the hearing occupying open 20 days and take written protests and then at the end of the hearing period the hearing officer is required to make a recommendation to the director. under the sf borrowed the hearing officer discretion is extremely limited he can do one of two things i want to read from the regulation it's at heart of the what the board about decide. under the s m f order in the report the testimony will be summarized and the director either approve one the locations from the facility or approve one of the proposed locations provided the applicant makes reasonable changes to the installation. i want you to notice what the hearing commissioner is not allowed to do she's not allowed to make a recommendation to deny all the proposed locations and that's for very good reason. that's not his role in the process. once weigh arrive at

with the community to identify support for the sf and e as well. the next point is sf and e is styling the procurement and purposing process. san francisco general is working in e in conjunction with the office of contract and office of public finance to identify ways to streamline the procurement process and that will include the review felt contracts and city procedures and that's in the early phases but will be continued to be streamlined. information technology finally we have a rebuild it program and compounds in place to make sure the infrastructure and systems for the new hospital are in place to support the patient care and improve the workflow and provide a stronger foundation for future systems. i'm going to turn it over to ron alameda >> thank you ron alameda department of public works manager for the

back last august when the sf puc voted on the rates, which would have started the program, the other grass roots groups that were involved in this agreed that the project should move forward, even though we had had many criticisms similar to those that bright line and the commissioner from the commission of the environment put forward. so even though those criticisms are kind of holding us back now and probably should not and it was right to push the point, i want you to know that this isn't a simple thing. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, my name is jackie flynn, i am the executive director of the a phillip randolph institute san francisco. we serve residents, san francisco residents, that are directly impacted by planning, development and recommendations given by the citizens committee on community development. and i feel that we need community advocates that have experience serving low income neighborhoods, under employed and unemployed residents here in san francisco in order to keep our families here. i am here on behalf of my organization to support both eddie ahn and miguel pe

in 2014 sf mta released a bicycle strategy for the investment infrastructure. i think it was a correct acknowledgment that it was needed. i applaud the goals presented today by the sf mta, specifically by the budget presented is not what it is now. it's half of what we need. it's also dependent on a november ballot. it leaves major gaps. downstairs in the photo exhibition, there is a bicycle parking meter. that reflects how bicycling is a necessary part of contemporary life in san francisco. we are a decade 1/2 in the century and infrastructure lacks a lot. i would really like to know why these plans are being watered down. particularly concerned about how we are only accomplishing part of the bicycle strategy. when we should be advertising the entire strategy without gaps with aggressive investment. thank you. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> my name is elias. i want to say that i agree with lawrence and leah. why are you only funding half of your goals. keep in mind this is not for the people who bike now. it's for the people that are afraid t

city clerk: sf 61234 item 7: 7. approving proposed service and route changes as part of the transit effectiveness project including frequency increases and decreases, new routes, expanded limited-stop service, realigned transit routes including eliminating segments of service in some casess, a route elimination, and expanded hours of operation to municipal railway transit service including the following route additions, realignments, and modifications/eliminations : e embarcadero; 1bx california "b" express, 2 clement; 5 and 5l fulton/fulton limited; 8x bayshore express; 10 townsend; 11 downtown connector; 12 folsom/pacific; 16x noriega express; 17 parkmerced: 18 46th avenue; 22 fillmore; 28 19th avenue; 28l 19th avenue limited; 29 sunset; 33 stanyan; 35 eureka; 43 masonic; 47 van ness; 48 quintara/24th. street; 52 excelsior and 76x marin headlands express, and the following service frequency modifications: 1 california; 2 clement; 3 jackson; 5 fulton/5l fulton limited; 6 parnassus; 8ax bayshore 'a' express; 8bx bay

yet >> next door our sf organizing we're going to have a whole generation of people in the city that loans what it's like to go through this we're going to be a strong program and train a lot of people in cpr and again, i want to thank all the investigators today, there or so many of you to celebrate and thank you, everyone for continuing to make this city strong and thank you, everyone so much. >> mayor ed lee let's hear it for him. before we bring up is more city heavily weights we'll hear from former mayor willie brown and chief joanne haynes-white and chief greg suhr and executive director ann and a special welcome to the 2014 survivor award honorary lee whose been putting this or in for 25 years let's hear it for him (clapping) we mentioned donna who's been keeping lilly alive and ron for his generous support let's give ron a noise hand and ladies and gentlemen, let's give a round of applause for the 1906 san francisco earthquake for not letting it fad into history (calling names) and grandchildren's and the san francisco chronological and other s those folks will be going 40 fo

first fill out an application and they can be opinioned on sf defender.org.u'll obtain a copy of your rap sheet that's a rap sheet going 80 the hall of justice at 850 bryant street on the fourth floor. the bureau is open monday through friday from 8 to 5. it's located one block away from the public defender's office you'll need to bring our photo id. finally, there's your our own your rap sheet to the front desk. you'll receive a letter from 2 to three weeks explaining the next steps. let's review the 3 steps if that fillist the police stations and on your police station and 3 deliver our rap sheet and application $0.40 to the defender. it can help with financial aid for colleagues. i want you to meet a client who did the clean slate program he refunds a nonprofit literary series. please meet joe. peep at the clean slate program worked with me today, i i am an author of 3 books a husband and a father would you recommend clean slight to another person >> i would definitely recommend that. so, now you have a better understanding of the gibt address benefits of

87,000 uninsured and 18 to 64 and of those, most of them are in our healthy san francisco or in the sf path programs and whereas there are almost 28,000 who are unknown for our systems and so, when we tried to determine who was eligible and in those groups we find that in both groups, most of the people are eligible for medical or for subsidized on coverage california. but, combined, we have about 18,000 people who are not eligible for coverage. and first we are due to the undocument status that it was also included and because of this case, we classified eligibility as subsidy and so that some people who are not eligible for subsidies or they are not eligible by age. >> and so, we know that everyone who is eligible did not enroll, and so at the end by applying estimate and different scenarios who is likely to enroll and not, we come up with on the left, among the unknown population that more than half of them are not going to enroll. and this would likely be because this population did not really take an initiative to enroll in the coverage when they had, or to enroll in healthy san f

my appointment was before this committee, was that there was no jobs plan yet behind the clean power sf program and until that had been articulated it was tough to support it, continue supporting it as i had done at least in my advocacy. so i think in the future i personally, speaking just for myself as a, stepping into the bright line role, would support the program moving forward in some way shape or form but our work is about ensuring jobs for the community and until those jobs materialize, it's hard. >> i'm just asking because i think it's important for the record to talk about the work of this organization which quite frankly i don't know that there's a lot of transparency around it, so i wanted to make sure that i knew more about it. but i do know there's a number of people, at least one person associated with this organization that was lobbying against community choice aggregation so i wanted to know why that was. >> could you name those individuals, supervisor? >> i think the individual is here so maybe he will be speaking later on. >> okay. >> any other questions? i'm just curi

per ounce and it will lead according to yale and varies institutions we have the best research from sf to back us but lead to a 20 to 25 percent reduction in sweet drinks in san francisco this tax will create thirty to $31 million of revenue for corner store initiatives in our city. we're here if small businesses and how we need to create healthier option in our neighborhood and create healthier school tuesday afternoons and fitness activities programs we'll hear from the parents organizations that support of the unified school district on how physical fitness and teachers themselves as well. that will also fund dental hydrogen in our city's public health department and with conversations with the sf dental society there's a wide awareness of shrug sweelgd beverages harm teeth health and it will help to tap the water and create the educational programs throughout the schools and city. many of us know been working on this for years a soda tax isn't a silver bullet but one strategy to protect the community and reduce consumption and raise revenue that helps in schools and park in the cit

we had a hefty reserve with the mou with the sf puc and that is the bill that actually pays for that work. if you want, we will have enough in riche our reserve in our one-year budget. some lafcos have a policy of what the reserve amount should be at minimum? and in some cases maximum. so we might want to in the future have that discussion, but the mou with the sfpuc will expire at the end of this upcoming fiscal year. so we won't have access to that money necessarily unless there is is an extension of that mou. but we should be planning and preparing ourselvess for it not to happen just to be on the safe side. so if that is at the discretion of this commission if it wants to give back allocated amount that is given to lafco or that the city and county and gives to lafco. under state statute once an estimate has been established the city and county or in this case the city and county of san francisco needs to give the exact same amount it gave in the previous year for the next year. they cannot reduce the lafco itself is the only body to reduce the amount. we have accepted the money