sf govtv if we can have the screen here. all right. so we want to be able to allow existing massage establishments that are operating without proper land use approval to legalize as a massage establishment and this would also be dependent on zoning controls where establishment is located at the time of the application. so we would allow them to continue in operation to continue the land use approval and participation in the amnesty program is dependent upon the massage establishment having the following. these are the same criteria. a valid business license prior to january 2015 and valid certification practitioner permit prior to that same date. they have been functioning in the state before that same date. there are no open violations. enforcement issues, 53 dph, department of planning at the time of permit approval and they must have submitted an application for the dph permitting process for their site within 90 days of the effective ordinance. of course we would outreach to as many establishments as possible. this is important. we

sf govtv, overhead, please. i will go ahead and read through it, i'm sorry. included in these cleaning services are clean sweeping out of property frontages and twice a month sidewalk scrubbing. 10-20 hours a week of graffiti removal and abatement. hypodermic needle removal and power washing. >> included in our agreement with the serves provider is a sample of equipment that we purchase from year to year, sidewalk scrubers and cleaning equipment. you will see in the photo here this is a sidewalk scrubber we purchased for the fiscal year year 2012-2013. we wanted to take note that our service provider does more than just keep the sidewalk in the neighborhood clean. they also provide a terrific service to individuals that are employed with their program and they provide transitional employment opportunities to individuals that might otherwise have a hard time getting back into the workforce. every year they do a graduation program and they also partner with city agencies and non-profits that help identify individuals that can join this program and we hear from

. >> sf govtv. >> we have to address some of the common scenarios that we've been asked about

. >> okay, before we get started i also want to note that sf govtv and thank the staff that is recording this for everybody to get a hold of, hersh and jessie larson. during this meeting i might call things out of order. i will start with item no. 16789 item no. one for receiving reports for fiscal years 2011 through 2014. >> okay. good morning chair yee, supervisor christensen. here to present to you the annual review process for the benefit district program. nothing new we haven't covered before. in terms of legislative overview, there are two laws that govern the community benefit district program. that is the state law 1994 act and article law 14. this covers fiscal years 2011 through 2014. o e wd is responsible for meeting their management plans and reports for cpa financial reviews and providing to you all a memo which is a part of your board packet. i do want to note for the civic center that there was a minor amendment to the memo we submitted to supervisor bree's office that we put in a budget. it was listed at over $700,000. it is in fact 91. this parcel map in front of you sho

. >> so sf govtv if i can just put the document on screen again. at the bottom you can see we are going to require that practitioner submit an application to dph permitting process within 90 days of the effective date of the ordinance. so you only have to submit it within 90 days. if we can complete the process, hopefully you can complete it as soon as possible but we are not going to penalize someone for not completing it within the 90 days. you just have to show a good faith effort. and we will allow those to continue in operation while on going this process. our goal is to not put people out of business. >> much of the process depends on the responsiveness of these other agencies, correct? >> correct. we understand that. >> as long as the application is in within 90 days, the practitioner can continue his or her trade? >> exactly. yes. >> and of course if they meet these requirements as i spelled out. >> right. >> commissioner cartagena? >> i want to thank both sides actually. i like to see thorough engagement from both sides. supervisor tang, a

just as a visual to sf govtv to show the spreadsheet here. as you can see where there is a c pound, one column is establishment for permitted and some are not permitted and the next column for medical services. for the most part they are permitted but there are other exceptions as well. we are going to be combing through these list to show that in those neighborhoods they are appropriately district with their supervisors and make them aware of the situation and if they decide they would like to take additional steps to zoning they can do so. it's complicated in terms of the amnesty program. this is the best solution to come up with to capture the most people and they would be allowed to continue in operation. >> depending on how this goes, if we get to this point where legislation is enacted and the zoning precludes it, what happens day one. am i out of business or do i have 18 months for remediation. what happens? >> that is something, the legislation does take effect within 30 days right after passage of the board. i think we are going to d