sf moma will demolish both structures and construct a new wing.rn, the museum will build at no cost to the city, a new fire station and a superior location at 935 fulsom. this proposal is win-win for t he city. it allows them to provide for the fire department, a brand new fire station that is superior in its physical layout and location. in terms of the economic benefits of the project, these are only items that can be easily quantified, museum expansion alone will generate 1100 construction jobs. the annual ongoing contribution in terms of property and sales taxes is expected to see $1 million. and the fire station itself, it exceeds the value of what the city gives to the museum by $10 million. the city is basically getting a gift of more than $10 million. the overall schedule for this project, above the museum and fire station is completion of the fire station in 2013. completion of the museum expansion in 2015. i would like to as representatives from planning, real estate, and the fire department to discuss this and we'll be available for que

on behalf of the w and sf moma. her concerns are about private use.ve pedestrian access and a substitute for the excess weight. the public pedestrian ways preserved and it is undisputed the vacation of hunt street is in the public interest because it is impossible to build without it. the w's need for access will be accommodated. this does not occur until 2013. after the new fire station is built. we have plenty of time between now and then to resolve the issue of private access. the eir indicates that sfmoma must do so and we're more than willing to do that. it suggests imposing a measure as a condition of the street vacation. you're within your rights to impose than as a condition. as greg should do, we are designing to accommodate the hotel's private needs and there is no reason we would have designed the museum in that way if we did not intend to provide the w with access to these provisions. that condition of approval or license agreement will accommodate the w's needs. for these reasons, the w's claim of damage is inconsistent and premature. the