to an sf mta public hearing. it provides a regular forum for the key agencies to review and comment on the changes to these right-of-ways. and it's important to note that it's only an informal advisory board. the board does not make any decisions about approving or disapproving any of the proposals. i will go into that further on into the presentation. so some of the agencies in the cities family that are represented are the sf mta's sustainable streets division, traffic, transit operations, parking enforcement, taxi services, the planning department, the department of public works, the police department and the fire department. these are the only members of the committee at this time. the agenda items that are heard at the task meetings are for proposed legislative or street changes that are requested by a project sponsor. the sponsors can come from a variety of fields, it can be an individual. as an example, there may be some concern from people on a street about the speed of vehicles going up and down their st

to an sf mta public hearing. it provides a regular forum for the key agencies to review and comment on the changes to these right-of-ways. and it's important to note that it's only an informal advisory board. the board does not make any decisions about approving or disapproving any of the proposals. i will go into that further on into the presentation. so some of the agencies in the cities family that are represented are the sf mta's sustainable streets division, traffic, transit operations, parking enforcement, taxi services, the planning department, the department of public works, the police department and the fire department. these are the only members of the committee at this time. the agenda items that are heard at the task meetings are for proposed legislative or street changes that are requested by a project sponsor. the sponsors can come from a variety of fields, it can be an individual. as an example, there may be some concern from people on a street about the speed of vehicles going up and down their st

again, this is not unaccustomed and will allow for the sf mta to be held to the same level of scrutiny as other departments to come before the board during the budget season. i have to remind myself sometimes maybe my colleagues and the public reminds me that one of the roles of the board of supervisors is fiduciary responsibility. if were going to take it seriously, we need have a little more say so. the board of directors will continue to retain the charter duties and powers to oversee the mta's and to establish this budget. i acknowledge the public's desire to have a transportation department that's independent and apolitical but i associated the city-i also hear the crying for a need for further accountability and oversight. there have been attempts in the past to change the way your points were made to alter the foreign process or add additional layers of oversight that were burdensome. i believe that this proposal before you today is not overarching, or not overreaching or irrational but it brings a fair approach by increasing the board of supervisors engagement with the sf mta b

chairman and members of the committee, on page 17 of our report we report that sf mta's actual average annual cost for the circle agreement 3.8 million between fiscal year 2012-13 and fiscal year 15-6 into based on increases reflected on the table shown on page 17 of our report, the sf mta estimates the proposed ordinance would result in increased cost of approximately $750,000 in 2016-17 and based on the average annual editors of approximately 3.8 million, that would represent and 18.8% increase. in addition, based on projected future hourly wage and benefit increases, sf mta is to make the proposed ordinance would result in an increase of $913,000 for each extension year of the circle agreement. there are five extension years. that would be an increase of 24% more than the current average annual cost of the sfmta. on page 18, we report that by requiring prevailing wages and transitional employment and retention of prior contractors and employees, it is possible that the city would receive the reduced number of competitive bidders in the future, which could result in increased cost to

sf mta,, cac recommends that the mta proceed with planning and engineering work for this to work streetcar extension to fort mason. that the mta be visit ridership projections as appropriate based on recent and projected changes use of space, and non--commute events at fort mason. the increase in ridership anticipated to result from upgrade to the stork streetcars on market street. finally, the mta-cac recommends the mta work with us house and senate delegation to secure funding for the design and engineering phase of this project. that's it. >> thank you very much. this is the second recommendation for my totally support that. i think we ought to move on that as quickly as we can. it's a great base. it moves people across the city. i can see caltrain going out there several kinds of events. so i know director reiskin has a response to that as well but thank you for that. i support that. members of the public get to address >> yes that you have several. will speak on >> >>[calling names] >> mr. chairman and members of the board, my name is white mike wilmot. i'm a marina rested a regular m

sf mta,, cac recommends that the mta proceed with planning and engineering work for this to work streetcar extension to fort mason. that the mta be visit ridership projections as appropriate based on recent and projected changes use of space, and non--commute events at fort mason. the increase in ridership anticipated to result from upgrade to the stork streetcars on market street. finally, the mta-cac recommends the mta work with us house and senate delegation to secure funding for the design and engineering phase of this project. that's it. >> thank you very much. this is the second recommendation for my totally support that. i think we ought to move on that as quickly as we can. it's a great base. it moves people across the city. i can see caltrain going out there several kinds of events. so i know director reiskin has a response to that as well but thank you for that. i support that. members of the public get to address >> yes that you have several. will speak on >> >>[calling names] >> mr. chairman and members of the board, my name is white mike wilmot. i'm a marina rested a regular m

sf mta,, cac recommends that the mta proceed with planning and engineering work for this to work streetcar extension to fort mason. that the mta be visit ridership projections as appropriate based on recent and projected changes use of space, and non--commute events at fort mason. the increase in ridership anticipated to result from upgrade to the stork streetcars on market street. finally, the mta-cac recommends the mta work with us house and senate delegation to secure funding for the design and engineering phase of this project. that's it. >> thank you very much. this is the second recommendation for my totally support that. i think we ought to move on that as quickly as we can. it's a great base. it moves people across the city. i can see caltrain going out there several kinds of events. so i know director reiskin has a response to that as well but thank you for that. i support that. members of the public get to address >> yes that you have several. will speak on >> >>[calling names] >> mr. chairman and members of the board, my name is white mike wilmot. i'm a marina rested a regular m

chairman and members of the committee, on page 17 of our report we report that sf mta's actual average annual cost for the circle agreement 3.8 million between fiscal year 2012-13 and fiscal year 15-6 into based on increases reflected on the table shown on page 17 of our report, the sf mta estimates the proposed ordinance would result in increased cost of approximately $750,000 in 2016-17 and based on the average annual editors of approximately 3.8 million, that would represent and 18.8% increase. in addition, based on projected future hourly wage and benefit increases, sf mta is to make the proposed ordinance would result in an increase of $913,000 for each extension year of the circle agreement. there are five extension years. that would be an increase of 24% more than the current average annual cost of the sfmta. on page 18, we report that by requiring prevailing wages and transitional employment and retention of prior contractors and employees, it is possible that the city would receive the reduced number of competitive bidders in the future, which could result in increased cost to

again, this is not unaccustomed and will allow for the sf mta to be held to the same level of scrutinyas other departments to come before the board during the budget season. i have to remind myself sometimes maybe my colleagues and the public reminds me that one of the roles of the board of supervisors is fiduciary responsibility. if were going to take it seriously, we need have a little more say so. the board of directors will continue to retain the charter duties and powers to oversee the mta's and to establish this budget. i acknowledge the public's desire to have a transportation department that's independent and apolitical but i associated the city-i also hear the crying for a need for further accountability and oversight. there have been attempts in the past to change the way your points were made to alter the foreign process or add additional layers of oversight that were burdensome. i believe that this proposal before you today is not overarching, or not overreaching or irrational but it brings a fair approach by increasing the board of supervisors engagement with the sf mta bo

chairman and members of the committee, on page 17 of our report we report that sf mta's actual average annual cost for the circle agreement 3.8 million between fiscal year 2012-13 and fiscal year 15-6 into based on increases reflected on the table shown on page 17 of our report, the sf mta estimates the proposed ordinance would result in increased cost of approximately $750,000 in 2016-17 and based on the average annual editors of approximately 3.8 million, that would represent and 18.8% increase. in addition, based on projected future hourly wage and benefit increases, sf mta is to make the proposed ordinance would result in an increase of $913,000 for each extension year of the circle agreement. there are five extension years. that would be an increase of 24% more than the current average annual cost of the sfmta. on page 18, we report that by requiring prevailing wages and transitional employment and retention of prior contractors and employees, it is possible that the city would receive the reduced number of competitive bidders in the future, which could result in increased cost to

on june 22, paul was honored with a banquet attended by current as well as retired staff of sf mta andate of honor from the board of supervisors and a plaque from his coworkers.

chairman and members of the committee, on page 17 of our report we report that sf mta's actual average annual cost for the circle agreement 3.8 million between fiscal year 2012-13 and fiscal year 15-6 into based on increases reflected on the table shown on page 17 of our report, the sf mta estimates the proposed ordinance would result in increased cost of approximately $750,000 in 2016-17 and based on the average annual editors of approximately 3.8 million, that would represent and 18.8% increase. in addition, based on projected future hourly wage and benefit increases, sf mta is to make the proposed ordinance would result in an increase of $913,000 for each extension year of the circle agreement. there are five extension years. that would be an increase of 24% more than the current average annual cost of the sfmta. on page 18, we report that by requiring prevailing wages and transitional employment and retention of prior contractors and employees, it is possible that the city would receive the reduced number of competitive bidders in the future, which could result in increased cost to

during the fourth quarter of fiscal 16, sf mta placed 33 out of the 3700 diesel motor switches into service and 50 more electric trolley buses and since the contracts were approved back in 2014, that sums to about 159 new trolleys and other vehicles. so our prop k sales tax has provided about 30% of the funding for new vehicles and motor coaches and trolley buses so far. we are pleased to see that progress. turning to pop aa we see in your hand out an update on our overall prop aa as well as many the projects completed put into the service. we allocate about $23 million to 21 projects across the program street categories of street repair, pedestrian safety and transit reliability. so, in keeping with the pop aa small projects and provide tangible benefits in the short term, we've seen nine of these projects open for use including for substantial street repair projects with the recent completion of dolores street we've also seen the mcallister street improvements near uc hastings, sidewalk and bicycle improvements along the boulevard in the presidio area as well as bart has completed the civ

just transit and think about the multimodal nature of travel with to and from san francisco, the sf mta is stated objective of 50% or more of all trips by nonprivate auto mode. we've done statistical we survey's with the past few years and in fact we are just above that target at around 52% of trips occurring. in nonprivate auto modes and that's both regional entering, regional exiting within the city of san francisco. we have seen a sort of study percentage of their and that is because this is all trips throughout the day. it's a big number. just over the more million troops protected odyssey that continues to grow as our employment and residential population continue to increase. if we take a little bit deeper dive and look specifically at commute trips we are noticing the net increase, the new trips that we are capturing from a transportation system, are actually occurring primarily by transit and active mode. that can be existing commuters, making a decision to use an alternative mode or a camino commuter same, to leave my car at home or on something up and own a car. this is really

just transit and think about the multimodal nature of travel with to and from san francisco, the sf mta is stated objective of 50% or more of all trips by nonprivate auto mode. we've done statistical we survey's with the past few years and in fact we are just above that target at around 52% of trips occurring. in nonprivate auto modes and that's both regional entering, regional exiting within the city of san francisco. we have seen a sort of study percentage of their and that is because this is all trips throughout the day. it's a big number. just over the more million troops protected odyssey that continues to grow as our employment and residential population continue to increase. if we take a little bit deeper dive and look specifically at commute trips we are noticing the net increase, the new trips that we are capturing from a transportation system, are actually occurring primarily by transit and active mode. that can be existing commuters, making a decision to use an alternative mode or a camino commuter same, to leave my car at home or on something up and own a car. this is really

just transit and think about the multimodal nature of travel with to and from san francisco, the sf mta is stated objective of 50% or more of all trips by nonprivate auto mode. we've done statistical we survey's with the past few years and in fact we are just above that target at around 52% of trips occurring. in nonprivate auto modes and that's both regional entering, regional exiting within the city of san francisco. we have seen a sort of study percentage of their and that is because this is all trips throughout the day. it's a big number. just over the more million troops protected odyssey that continues to grow as our employment and residential population continue to increase. if we take a little bit deeper dive and look specifically at commute trips we are noticing the net increase, the new trips that we are capturing from a transportation system, are actually occurring primarily by transit and active mode. that can be existing commuters, making a decision to use an alternative mode or a camino commuter same, to leave my car at home or on something up and own a car. this is really

just transit and think about the multimodal nature of travel with to and from san francisco, the sf mtas stated objective of 50% or more of all trips by nonprivate auto mode. we've done statistical we survey's with the past few years and in fact we are just above that target at around 52% of trips occurring. in nonprivate auto modes and that's both regional entering, regional exiting within the city of san francisco. we have seen a sort of study percentage of their and that is because this is all trips throughout the day. it's a big number. just over the more million troops protected odyssey that continues to grow as our employment and residential population continue to increase. if we take a little bit deeper dive and look specifically at commute trips we are noticing the net increase, the new trips that we are capturing from a transportation system, are actually occurring primarily by transit and active mode. that can be existing commuters, making a decision to use an alternative mode or a camino commuter same, to leave my car at home or on something up and own a car. this is really j

of several previous collisions and tragic fatalities and so we are grateful for sf public works and agencies including mta and call transfor bringing those projects in, including becon and several, pedestrian, improvements and out in the medians. >> and that the agreement will be executed in the fall and so we want to thank commissioner cohen for her assistant and staed fast to the effort and supporting cal tran ourselves and the cities and it has really turned into the agency wide organization assessment, to review the five year, envision and goals and the work program road map in how to work internally and externally with the partners and again, to develop, our place of work, and as an excellent place of work for all of our staff, and so i look forward to briefing the board on this work in the fall. and finally, thank you to cjthia and her staff, and the u for helping to produce a joint. >> any comments or questions on the executive director's report? >> seeing none, is there any public comment on item three. >> seeing none, public comment is closed and this is an information item. item number four? >>

of several previous collisions and tragic fatalities and so we are grateful for sf public works and agencies including mta and call transfor bringing those projects in, including becon and several, pedestrian, improvements and out in the medians. >> and that the agreement will be executed in the fall and so we want to thank commissioner cohen for her assistant and staed fast to the effort and supporting cal tran ourselves and the cities and it has really turned into the agency wide organization assessment, to review the five year, envision and goals and the work program road map in how to work internally and externally with the partners and again, to develop, our place of work, and as an excellent place of work for all of our staff, and so i look forward to briefing the board on this work in the fall. and finally, thank you to cjthia and her staff, and the u for helping to produce a joint. >> any comments or questions on the executive director's report? >> seeing none, is there any public comment on item three. >> seeing none, public comment is closed and this is an information item. item number four? >>