sfers is actual. the blue line? yes, that is actual. >> thank you. >> perhaps commissioner driscoll what might be helpful is we could provide this graph with the policy return and actual returns and are i think what you'll see is the distance between the blue line which is actual return and the policy return is positive, but that will be smaller then the difference between the policy return and 70/30 so that gets to your question. big component is asset allocation and added value beyond that. >> the alpha provided by staff is the actual over policy. >> correct. >> that is different number, but that is one. i'll leave that issue. just a thing again, forget which page mention , going forward there is a issue about factors. i know when we evaluate and retain wilshire, the issue how they will do more factor consideration or additional factors with asset al scaigz and there will be factor analysis going forward. >> absolutely. that is the next steps we are working diligently. it is a big undertaking but that is absolutel

military leave prior to the time they became members of sfers. in order to implement, we needed to update the public service policy and that is what you have before you, including some cleanup language since it has been quite some time since we have reviewed it. happy to answer any questions at any of you may have. >> any questions? >> quick question. so, with the current language you are proposing will go into effect immediately? >> absolutely. >> okay. that's most important. >> if you pass it today, we are ready to post the updated application purchase policy and faq and respond to the many members who have contacted us and expressed interest. >> i know you have a back-log and why i asked the question. >> we do. we are ready. >> thank you mr. chair. >> any further questions, comments? >> two comments. a lot of phone calls and interest since this passed by the board of supervisors many months ago. i just know that the communication to the members who are going to be very interested in deciding to take advantage of this benefit has been great bec

people don't tell poll sfers this is most important thick to me. but then vote, it certainly is.ht fox news saying i'm pro-life but obviously out of step with everybody else. and yet you have like in your total ban state, wisconsin lost the supreme court because they had an 1849 total ban. ohio girls raped by illegal immigrants having to flee the state. i just -- in all of your travels with the circus, i'm wondering, what are you picking up among republicans, are they just doomed to continue losing? because they are oblivious on this issue? i say losing nationally because they are so oblivious on this issue. >> well, i guess the question, i mean, there is a parallel to this, right? which is -- and a parallel that you've drawn in the past which is, you know, why do republicans continue to stick with donald trump. when donald trump is as proven again and again to be a loser for them. if they tie their fortunes to donald trump, go back to 2016, except that, there is not an example that you can find where donald trump as the poster boy for the republican party or directly on the ball