sfgov tv if you could. is your presentation loaded on the laptop in front of you? if not, we can do it the old school way, we have the handouts

sfgov tv if you could. is your presentation loaded on the laptop in front of you? if not, we can do it the old school way, we have the handouts in front of us. >> i have it on the screen. >> all right there it is. put it in the slide show for mat. format. all right take it away. >> my name is krista denao i am the manager of youth environment board. we are seeking support to build youth leadership which will create and promote -- for our community. bodies like these advisory boards work we know this. i would like to introduce you to one of your young people anuvis. >> hi, i am a former homeless youth of san francisco. we the youth have motivated or community to fight for safe and healthy schools for generations. thousands of san francisco youth have jumped up to join the mas masses against violence. -- false quick fixes, efforts like bringing more guns into school. you cannot let us walk alone. >> we urge our city leaders to take this opportunity to advance the unit for our young people and lead us in a society without all forms of violence. thank you. >> i am alex

dvds are available for purchase from sfgov tv. we will affirm all those who intend to testify. please note that any member of the public may speak without taking an oath pursuant to their rights under the sunshine ordinance. if you intend to testify and you wish the board to give your testimony evidentiary weight, stand and say i do after you have been sworn or affirmed. somebody is going to be talking tonight, right? [laughter] >> clerk: i assume. okay. do you swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? thank you. we have a few housekeeping items. president fung and members of the commission, we have two items where the parties have requested a continuance. the first item is appeal number 15-125, gorr partners versus zoning investigator. the subject property is 660 third street appealing issuance of planning code section 174. and the parties have requested a continuance to june 6, 2018. do we have -- we require a motion? >> so moved. >> clerk: okay. motion by president fung on that motion. commissioner l

. >> clerk: sfgov tv, please show the office of small business slide. >> okay. our custom to begin and end each small business commission meeting with a reminder that the office of small business is the only place to start your new business in san francisco and the best place to get answers to your questions about doing business here in san francisco. and again, if you want to voice your concerns about policies that affect the economic vitality of small businesses in san francisco, please let us know, and you know it all starts here at the office of small business. thank you. >> clerk: item 11, adjournment, action item. >> do we have a motion to adjourn? >> motion. >> second. >> all in favor? >> okay. commission closed. motion passes, 5-0, one absent. >> shop & dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges resident to do their showing up and dining within the 49 square miles of san francisco by supporting local services within the neighborhood we help san francisco remain unique successful and vibrant so where will you shop & dine in the 49 san francis

we'll take a copy for the record, and sfgov has your slides ready to go. >> thank you. i would like to start off with item number one, which is our victim witness grant. we have 10 positions in that grant that covers the cost. we also provide direct services to victims and witnesses. when i started here 31 years ago, we only had three advocates back then, and our grants have definitely increased and improved the quality of services we're able to provide victims and witnesses. in this grant, we were able to acquire two courthouse facility dogs. the courthouse dogs have gone out to meet with victims of crime. they comfort them. they soothe them. they help them through court preparation, through trials. and they were recently deployed out to las vegas to assist. each dog assisted over 300 victims and helped them through the process. we are able to also provide training with this grant. last year, in 2017, we served 8,626 victims, and we provided 85,821 services. and that means crisis intervention follow-up services, navigating victims through the criminal justice system, e

i would like to thank sfgov tv. there is an overflow room in 263. madam clerk, are there any announcements? >> clerk: plea complete the speak -- please complete the speaker cards. items acted porn will appear -- upon today will appear on april 12th. >> i would like to take items out of order. please call items 8 and 9. >> item 8 amending the administrative court to amend the city code to $15.86 per hour on july 1, 2016. 16.8 sixty 2018. item nine amending the code to increase the hourly compensation rate for employees of city contractors to 15.8 sixty july 1, 2016, 16.86 there after biannual cost of living increases. >> i believe we have a report from the controller's office today. no. none. excuse me one second. we have a report from the budget analyst. >> good morning, supervisors. there are two pieces of legislation spending before this committee. one would increase the minimum compensation to 16.86 for for profit contractors for the city on july 1, 2018 that is above the minimum wage. the other would expand the minimum compensation ordinance to

i want to thank sfgov again for today's broadcast. that's jim smith and leo. madam clerk, would you call item one. >> clerk: 1. hearing on public safety investments in the city budget, identifying funding levels and opportunities for future spending priorities; and requesting the budget and legislative analyst, police department, and district attorney to report. >> all right. thank you very much. so, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the third budget priority hearing. today we're focused on public safety in san francisco. public safety means a lot of different things to different people. it means not worrying about your car window being smashed, not worrying about your home being broken into. it also means calling on law enforcement when you need help. it is trusting that you can call on the police in an emergency and knowing that they will show up and trusting that the judicial system will always work fairly and expressly towards justice. it means not worry are -- worrying that law enforcement will profile you based on the color of your skin, and most importan

and we would like to thank sfgov. madam clerk. any announcements? >> clerk: please silence any cell foepz and any paperwork is now with the clerk. >> supervisor tang: can you call item one? >> clerk: yes. ordinance amending the planning code to allow the owner of premises leased to the city and county san francisco. >> supervisor kim: i don't have opening comments. just want to bring up planning department staff to present. >> the planning commission heard this item on april 19 and voted to approve the ordinance with modifications. it's my understanding that supervisor kim has those changes in the draft. they are largely clerical in nature the commission supports the legislation as it aligned with the general plan and facilities policy for police facilities that will help with police functions and reduce the risk presented by the most vulnerable structures. and provide assistance to reduce risks. >> supervisor kim: can we open it up for public comment? >> supervisor tang: any members? seeing none. public comment is closed. >> supervisor kim: i have

i would like to take a moment to acknowledge charles and mya hernandez at sfgov tv for broadcasting the meetings and making sure they are available to the public. mr. clerk please call the roll call. >> commissioner kim present. and ronen is present. commissioner yee. >> yee present. we have quorum. >> thank you. would you please call items two and three together. >> items two and three are the consent agenda and items are routine. staff is not planning to present on the items but are prepared if desire. if a member objects, any of the items may be remoouvend considered separately. >> thank you very much. so are that there any questions our comments from colleagues? not colleagues from colleagues. seeing none, we will open for public comment on these two items. seeing no public comment, these items have closed. >> we need a motion and second. >> and motion to approve the minutes. >> do we have a motion? we have a motion and we have -- >> a second. >> can we do that objection? >> we need to do roll. >> roll call on items two and throe. >> con the consent agenda -- on the consent agenda c

yesterday at 5:00, 5:15 i pulled up my sfgov website to find that supplement cal material had been submitted, concerningst third floor where most of the changes is happening. but attached to that was a large file, harder to download actually that set of drawings which should have been in our package last thursday. to tell you the truth, i have a home field advantage of looking at drawings that just comes with my background, and i was up till last night about 10:30 or 11:00, trying to figure out what's going on because the staff report still does not match of what is in the drawing package, and that starts most and foremost with the way the units are described. unit six is the -- unit five is the one which gets pushed into the fourth floor, becomes unit

i would like to thank sfgov tv. there is an overflow room in 263. madam clerk, are there any announcements? >> clerk: plea complete the speak -- please complete the speaker cards. items acted porn will appear -- upon today will appear on

sfgov tv, i have a powerpoint presentation. before you today is one application for your consideration for the business to be included on the legacy business registry. the application was reviewed by me for completion then submitted to planning department staff on february 21st for their review. the historic preservation commission heard the application on march 21st and made a positive recommendation to the small business commission. for the applicant, the commission has been provided a staff report, draft resolution, the application, a case report from planning department staff, and a resolution from the historic preservation commission. there are copies on the table for the public. the applicant is the jazz room. the jazz room is located at 5267 third street and opened in 1962, a time of similarering unrest in the bayview-hunters point community. african americans made it their home after world war ii. this unrest channelled a sense of community. in this environment, the jazz room opened as a venue that would offer live musi

going to use the mayor's communication assets, the board of supervisors communication assets, and sfgov, and then sfpuc has digital copies of everything that goes out to our customers, as well. moving onto clean energy influencers, so throughout the year we partner with stakeholders who are part of this movement. we do a lot of phone banking recentlies with them to upgrade customers to super green. we're going to share that information, we're going to attend events, we're going to attend more of those sound banking nights, and we're going to attend more panels as well to have a little bit more discussion about why it's important to go super green, why it's important to have this type of energy in san francisco. it's also important to meet some of these customers face-to-face, so we're looking at a very diverse customer base. we have small mom and pop shops, but we have large customers that don't even manage their own energy bills, they have a party that does that. so we did get some information from other cca's across the state, where third party customers prefer to have that face-to-fa

commission thanks media services and sfgot tv for telerising the immediating which can be viewed on sfgov2 or extremed on sfgovtv.org. members of the public, please take the time to silence your phones or other electronic devices. public comment during the meeting is limited to three minutes for speaker. speakers are requested but not required to state arthur names. completion of a speaker card while optional, will help ensure proper spelling of speakers' names in the written record of the meeting. please place speaker cards in the basket to the right of the lectern. speaker cards will be called in the order in which they were placed in the basket. initially there is a sign in sheet on the front table. sfgovt sfgovtv, please show the office of small business live. >> good afternoon. it is the tradition to start each meeting with the small business commission is the o-- should be your first stop when you have questions about what to do next. you can all find us in person or on-line at city hall. best of all, all our services are free of charge. the small business commission is the official

so we talked about the revenue requirement -- >> i've got a call into sfgov tv. we've got to keep it on one of the monitors for closed captioning. i'm going to try to get it off the second one where it's actually updated, as well. [ inaudible ] >> i know that. >> shall i continue the presentation? >> yes. >> okay. so we talked about the revenue requirement, which is a significant component of the rate and charge proposal. we talked about the water sales volume assumptions for retail water sales, and now we'll talk about the cost of service analysis. again that is the financial and engineering work that goes into saying okay, these are how certain customer classes use the system, how they cause costs, and what their share of costs should be. it goes into informing the rate design. and so some of the key updates that have occurred during this study, we've done -- this is a lot of behind the scenes work this's unglamorrous. we've updated customer classes and peak systems, so we actually have meter level data to support our peaking factors, which is to a large degree

. >> clerk: sfgov, can you go to the overhead, please. >> hi. thank you very much for hearing us. my name is cynthia montes. i'm a resident of bay crest, and i wanted to share with you information that bay crest received from trinity consultants dated january 19, 2018 regarding a review of technical report by ramble environment. as displayed in table 13 which is on exhibit of the ramble report, there was an increase in -- [ inaudible ] >> are substantially higher than levels considered reasonable for residential projects. this is not accurately reported by the planning department jessica range on march 29 hearing. the ramble report did not include a review nor evaluation of construction impacts. given the location of the project, proximity to the other residential units, and an air quality impact analysis without such a review of construction impacts are incomplete. in section 4.1 -- 4.1.1, chemical section selection, the ramble report states that california regulatory guidelines allow diesel particulate matter for exposure of the mixtures of chemicals that makeup diesel exhaust a

i would like to thank jim smith and jesse larson for broadcasting this meeting with sfgov tv. >>> silence all electronic devices. speaker cards should be it

supervisor kim: i want to acknowledge and thank our county clerk, john care ol, and thank the staff at sfgov tv for making sure that our meetings are available on-line and to the public. mr. clerk, do you have any statements? >> clerk: items acted upon today will appear on the april 3rd, 2018 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> supervisor kim: thank you so much, mr. clerk. can we take a motion to excuse supervisor peskin? and we have a motion to excuse supervisor peskin. we can do that without opposition. mr. clerk, can you please call the first item. >> clerk: item number one is a resolution approving an historical property contract between patrick mooney and steven g. tom, the owners of 60 to 62 mooney street, a. >> supervisor kim: thank you so much. this is, i think the third time we are now hearing this item, but supervisor sheehy did request that we bring this back to gao, and i know that we have sharon johnson from supervisor sheehy's office as well as tim frye from the historic preservation to present on this item, and my understanding is the owners, steven mooney

i would like to thank jim smith and jesse larson for broadcasting this meeting with sfgov tv. >>> silence all electronic devices. speaker cards should be submitted to the clerk. >> madam clerk, can you call item number one. 180250 update on the board of supervisor's budget priorities for fy2018-2019 hearing on identifying the board of supervisor's surveyed budget priorities for fy2018-2019, and reviewing the budget committee priority hearing schedule; and requesting the budget and legislative analyst to report. 180223 human services agency and department of public health - >> thank you. we have a present from the budget and analysis office. >> supervisor fewer and members of the committee. i'm here to provide a brief update on the board's budget priorities process. as you may remember, in february, we solicited the top three citywide budget priorities from each board office. the three most frequently cited priorities during that process were homelessness and housing, clean streets, and public safety. in addition, several other priorities were cited but much less frequently than the previo

service costs to the department such as sfgov sv total 18,000. on the cca work order side, the only cost charged as of march 31st is approximately 2,000 for executive director salary and benefits prior to his separation and the marin clean energy refund for 2,000 for the incomplete portion of that study in 2015-16. so you can see the line items that you are needing to create an estimate for for fiscal year -- the remaining 17-18 and 18-19. the estimated remaining balance at the year end for june 30, 2018 is going to be approximately $31,750, and this estimate assumes the cost of the contractor for the executive officer services for the month of may and june working 40 hours per week. for the 2018-19 budget, assuming the contractor works 40 hours per week throughout the year, approximately 136, 0 156,000. the other costs being the same this year, the office estimated that the lafco's total expenditures would be 273,000 for the next fiscal year. as i've mentioned to you previously in february , we requested the statutory amount requested for lafco