sfgovtv, i have a presentation. before you today are two applications for your consideration for the businesses to be included on the legacy business registry. the applications were reviewed by me for completion, then submitted to planning department staff on may 9 for their review. historic preservation commission heard the applications on june 6 and made positive recommendations to the small business commission. for both applicants, you have been provided a staff report, a draft tionlu the application, a case report from planning department staff, and a resolution from the historic preservation commission. there are copies on the table for the public. item 3-a is the animal company. the business is a small, neighborhood pet store located in noe valley. the animal company was founded in 1976 as a full line pet store, selling troppical fish and birds, along with the products to maintain these animals. in 2001, after 25 years of business, rick and allen french purchased the animal company and molded the store to fit

dvd's of this video are available for purchase from sfgovtv. now we will swear in or affirm any member of the public who wishes to testify. if you intend to testify at any of tonight's proceedings and wish to have the board give your testimony evidenceary weight, please stand and raise your right hand and say i will or i affirm. do you swear or affirm that the testimony you will give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. okay. commissioners, we have one housekeeping matter this evening. matter number four has been administratively dismissed because the permit was cancelled by the permit holder. [agenda item read] >> clerk: so that has been administratively dismissed, so we will now move onto item number 1, which is general public comment. this is an opportunity for anyone who would like to speak on a matter within the board's jurisdiction but that is not on tonight's calendar. please take a speaker card and turn it into gary when it's your time to speak. is there any member of the public that wishes to speak on an item

we want to thank sfgovtv and the asian american journalists organization who are taping the forum tonight. we also want to thank the asian american journalists, the national coalition of 100 blam women san francisco, san francisco beautiful, san francisco council of district merchants association, san francisco heritage, mechanic institute, and the vanness quarter neighborhood coalition. we would also like to thank the san francisco wholesale produce market, which has generously donated fresh fruit, so if anyone would like a snack, please take some. i am pleased to introduce tonight's moderator, bob butler. he's an independent journalist on the award winning chauncey project. welcome [applause]. >> good evening. so we have seven candidates running for mayor tonight. london breed is not here because of a scheduling conflict. the candidates will have a chance to present their views on issues affecting the city and to answer your questions about those issues. to submit questions for the candidates, look for a volunteer who is handing out index cards who will collect all the questions by 7:15

is sfgovtv ready. coming out of closed session, is there a motion not to disclose? great. all those in favor? great. item passes. mr. secretary, next item, please. >>> item six, general public comment. >>> are there any members of the public that would like to address the commission under general public comment for those items that are not agendized? >>> today i'm gonna speak on an election issue. there's a new mayor conceded at 1:00 a.m., congratulations. congratulations to you two for being reelected. the two commissioners who were appointed this year were very strong supporters of the new mayor. commissioner bridges was going to city hall every day. i just want to say that this is a political board. there are political appointments and political elections to the members. that's the way it is. i don't think that the mayor, the interim mayor appointed the best possible appointments. and that doesn't mean me. there are a huge number of highly qualified professionals. i think the members deserve a lot better than that. it was an extremely opaque process. i tried to particip

our clerk today is kathrin majors, and we are grateful to sfgovtv for their broadcasts. madam clerk, are there any announcements? [agenda item read] >> supervisor cohen: okay. thank you very much. could you please call items 1, 2, and 3 together. >> clerk: yes. item number 1 is a resolution determining and declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the construction, reconstruction, acquisition, improvement, seismic strengthening and repair of the embarcadero seawall and other needed infrastructure. item 2 is a plan reviewing the city's two year fiscal plan to increase the proposed seawall bond from 350 million to 425 million to fund phase one of the seawall program. and item number 3 is an ordinance calling and providing for a special election to be held in the city and county of san francisco on tuesday, november 6, 2018. >> supervisor cohen: great. thank you very much. first, i'd like to call up our city administrator, naomi kelley. she will be making a brief presentation, and following her will be the director of the san francisco port miss elaine forbes.

. >> good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, sfgovtv. another wonderful agenda set out ahead of us. talking about our favorite subject on thursdays we like to talk about, budget and finance. mr. clerk, could you please call item 4, or attendance and all that stuff? >> quickly, this is, please silence all electronic devices, complete speaker cards and any documents should be submitted to the clerk. any items acted on will be on the june 5th agenda unless otherwise stated. resolution approving a lease approximately 41,000 -- >> item 4. motion ordering submitted to the voters and elections to be held on november 6, 2018, and ordinance amending the business and tax regulation code to add a new gross receipt tax category for transportation network companies, services and private transit vehicle services. all right. thank you, so this ordinance would impose a gross receipts tax transpon network companies, services and private transit vehicle services. largely includes companies like uber, lyft and chariot. i just wanted to let you know that we are not debating the merits of the legislatio

we've got sfgovtv assisting us with today's broadcast. thank you, and i want to thank and recognize linda wong, who is our clerk today, recognizing that we ha've got sandy fewer my right. supervisor sheehy will be joining us tot at approximately 1:00. supervisor stefani and ronen are on my right. we've got a decent sized schedule. first some housekeeping. we're going to hear a few item today. first, the walking budget director will walk us through the technical adjustments. next, we will move onto unresolved policy issues that we left last here. we're going to hear from public policy, public health, police department, judging on the time, we'll probably hear from the police partme aer lunch, and we will play that portion by ear. we will be talkiking votes on the cans today. reallocation votes will be taken on wednesday. so today, we're going to continue the work that we started last week. we intend to release or spending plan -- our spending plan in this chamber at 11:00. paper copies will be made available and we will as always post on-l

this meeting is broadcast life on sfgovtv and will be re-broadcast on friday's at 4:00 p.m. on channel 26. now we will swear in or affirm all those who intend to testify. please note that any member of the public may speak without taking an oath pursuant to the rights under the sunshine ordnance. please stand, raise your right hand and say i do after you've been sworn in or affirmed. do you swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? thank you. commissioners, we have one housekeeping item. this is item number nine. this is appeal no. 17-184. the parties have requested a continuance to september 26, 2018. requesting that bpa numbers 2(016)081-1483 be suspended for the reason that the condominium constructed on the property in 2016 was not completed in accordance with the final approved plans permitted. is there any public comment on that motion? seeing none on that motion. [roll call] >>> that matter is moved to the 26th. we will now move on to item number one which is general public comment. this is th

we have two people at sfgovtv, that's mya hernandez and jim smith and the ladies are here ready to go to work. i'm going to wait for my fellows to join me. i need them here. but we have sandy fewer to my right and to my left is cath ryan ancatherine. when the guys get here we're going to welcome them and keep moving. so, today we are going to hear from eight departments, ok. we're going to hear from oewd, dcyf, the sheriff's department, d.p.h., district attorney office as well as planning, homelessness. some of these departments have reached an agreement in this committee and some departments have already reached agreement and this committee is taking action but we've called them back for more in sight into specific spending, particularly for dcyf and d.p.h. as a reminder, after today's deliberations we will adjourn for the weekend. monday, we will have discussions on the outstanding policy issues. if we reach no resolution today, we always have monday. also, i want to introduce our revised -- i will reintroduce our revised split spending plan that will reflect public comment, which w

office for embedding the links for the supporting documents into each meeting agenda topic on the sfgovtv website, it's both useful and insures that supporting documents are available to meeting attendees. the benchmarking report that was discussed in the april meeting, it contained usefulescriptive statistics, but in the 84-page report i could only find six slides that benchmarked the financial performance of san francisco against other cities, that would allow the reader to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of city services, which is the mission of the city services auditor. the first slide was page 27 of the report which dealt with street resurfacing cost. san francisco spends $1134 per square mile. actually, san francisco's overhead cost of $242 per square mile is 80% of seattle's total cost. so it looks like, as you can see from the graph, the san francisco costs are way out of line. one thing i would comment on that the material used in san francisco are dramatically different and have a longer life, but the amount of difference is way beyond that difference. slide 2, deals wi

sfgovtv, please show the office of small business slide. >> it is our custom to begin and end each small business commission meeting with a reminder that the office of small business is the only place to start your new business in san francisco. it's the best place to get answers to your questions about doing business in san francisco, and the san francisco small business commission is the official public forum to voice your opinions and concerns about policies that affect the economic vitality of small businesses in san francisco. if you need assistance with small business matters, it starts here at the office of small business. next item, please. >> clerk: item 9, adjournment, action item. >> can we have a motion to adjourn. >> move to adjourn. >> second. >> all in favor? okay. meeting over. thank you. >> okay. motion passes, 6-0, and the meeting is adjourned at 7:05 p.m. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> i came to san francisco in 1969. i fell in love with this city and and this is where i raised my family at. my name is bobbie cochran. i've been a holly court resident for 32 years. i wo

i want to thank the staff at sfgovtv who ensure that our meetings are made available to the public, both online and via transcript as well. any announcements? >> yes. please ensure you silence your cell phones, completed speaker cards and copies of documents should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon will be in the june 20. can you call item 1 through 6 together. >> six resolutions authorizing the director of the mayor's office to have housing and community development to execute local operating subsidy program grant agreements. these for services at zygmunt arendt house located at 850 broderick street, in an amount not to 11,787,548. and 871 turk street. 455 fell street. railton place, 242 turk street not to exceed 5,561,543. and monterey boulevard apartments, in amount not to exceed 1,662,342. >> i want to welcome ann romero to present on these six items. >> good morning, supervisors. my name is ann romero, i'm a senior project manager at the mayor's housing project. first i'll give a brief background on the program and describe the agreements. so as you may know, the local ope

. >> good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, sfgovtv. another wonderful agenda set out ahead of us. talking about our favorite subject on thursdays we like to talk about, budget and finance. mr. clerk, could you please call item 4, or attendance and all that stuff? >> quickly, this is, please silence all electronic devices, complete speaker cards and any documents should be submitted to the clerk. any items acted on will be on the june 5th agenda unless otherwise stated. resolution approving a lease approximately 41,000 -- >> item 4. motion ordering submitted to the voters and elections to be held on

this meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv. dvds are available for purchase. now we will swear in or affirm all those who intend to testify. please note any member of the public may speak without taking an oath. if you intend to testify at any of the proceedings and you wish to have the board give your testimony evidentiary weight, stand if you are able, raise your hand and say i do after you have been sworn in or been affirmed. do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? thank you. please b seated. we have house keeping items. three matters have been withdrawn. item number 5, this is appeal number 18-044 concerning the subject property at 9 freelon street. this is regarding the issuance by the zoning administrator on march 23rd, 2018 of a notice of violation and penalty decision to sf freelon holdings llc alleging violations of the planning code for the unpermitted office use. complaint number 2017-008013enf. item number 7 has been withdrawn. this is appeal number 18-015 concer

service costs by other department such as sfgovtv, and others around 13,000. th and then, on the cca work order side, the cost charge as of may 15, 2018, is about $2300 for the executive director's salary and benefits that occurred prior to his separation. a refund from nce for an incomplete portion of the study, and then -- mce for an incomplete portion of the study, and then $450 for the executive officer cca work. so here is your proposed budget for 2018-19, and i've included a rundown of each line item in your memo. none of these numbers have really changed a lot since the april 20 budget presentation. this amount includes the estimate for executive officer services, and i would like to recommend today that you approve the final budget for fiscal 2018-19 in the amount of $273,000. that will be used about $24,000 that we can return to the city and county of san francisco. of course the commission reserves the right to retain the full amount of $191,000 in fiscal year 2020. one thing i want to note is there is a chance to change the amounts by the committee

and then finally thank you to sfgovtv and media live for airing this event live to the public. go ahead and get started with a roll call.

we've got sfgovtv assisting us with today's broadcast.hank you, and i want to thank and recognize linda wong, who is our clerk today, recognizing that we ha've got sandy fewer o

. >> can we bring the slides back up again, sfgovtv? we have a -- just to help you at the end of your package as we move forward, the six modifications what we just proposed, i'm looking at page six of your draft resolutions, which is where any such proposals that you're making would be made. numbers five and six are related to the pop outs, so if were to remove those piece prosecutes it, you would need to have an additional number- additional resolution to modify it to keep notice for the pop outs, but those numbers five and six that are there right now which is the commission policy about preapps, and the three year rule about the serial permitting, those would not be to be included because they're essentially moot at this point in time. and then, commissioner richards related to sizes of the materials, you can see that a couple of these are about the proposed side of the mailer. >> the legislation still has 4.5 by 6, by the way. >> and the staff resolution as currently written now is to do a half sheet which could be another commissi

and then finally thank you to sfgovtv and media live for airing this event live to the public. go ahead and get started with a roll call. [roll cal [roll call] >> just to note, too -- are we going to -- >> yeah, we just needed to note that vice president thomas is excused. >> great. i was going to note that this was actually commissioner frost's last meeting tonight for the commissioners who didn't know that. he is terming out and stepping down, so let's make it a good one for him. so the first item on our agenda is general public comment. this is comment on any item or business that pertains to the san francisco entertainment commission. is there any public comment at this time? all right. seeing none, public comment is cles. we'll move onto item 2, which is the approval of minutes from april 1, 2018. commissioners, is there a motion? >> i move to approve. >> all right. there's a motion to approve. is there a second? >> second. >> great. is there any public comment on our minutes? alght. if there's no changes to the minutes, let's go ahead and take a vote. [roll call] >> the m

. >> if sfgovtv could put the overhead on, please. my name is mark miller. this is the last of our group comment. we support the proposed per-household and driver limits. we support adding a definition but suggest a strange in language. the phrase primarily abuted by residential property is vague, not measurable and open to subjective interpretation. we don't know what is being measured, total square footage per block. number of residential units, we request to amend that language to abuted by property occupied by one or more households. i should be clear we don't support adding language for paid plus permit parking, there's no data to support this and will invite additional neighbor parking. this with a suggested change to the laing wamg. language. the term commercial property. phrase separate entrance is unnecessary and vague. the suggested change reads defined by a separate address where address is also defined in the code. we further request you add a definition for address which is not in the code presently to apply for both residents and businesses. th

. >> supervisor cohen: sfgovtv if you could show that. >> director reiskin: because the fund got built up so high, 20% of the operatingbuet, we did in the last two year budget as well as in this proposed budget proposed drawing down on that rverese putting it only to one-time uses, such as equipment purchases or other capital improvements, but we are proposing some expenditure th that, but it would still, as apprd, aore the latest projections from the controller's office would leave us above that 10% reserve requirement, and this is what we would have to draw on should there be an economic downturn. >> supervisor cohen: all right. supervisor sheehy, did you have -- >> supervisor sheehy: just a quick question, and thank you, supervisor stefani for stimulating this. do police officers still -- is there still that requirement a part of their shift that they ri on a muni vehicle? >> director reiskin: i believe that's still probably in writing a policy of the police department. it would be a better question for the police department, whether it's still a policy and to what extent it's reall

our friends at sfgovtv, jesse and derek helping us broadcast this committee meeting and of course our linda wong came back to work today, thank you very much. call items 3 and 4, and 3 and 4, specific to the june budget. >> item 3, budget and appropriation ordinances, all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for departments of city. 4, annual budget for the fiscal years ending june 30, 2019, and june 30, 2020, establishing the positions. >> supervisor cohen: thank you very much for that. a few housekeeping rules. first, the agenda for today. we'll deal with items 1 and 2, public comment. excuse me, 3 and 4, which is public comment. we will take that, people will have one minute. we will close public comment and then call 1 and 2 back and we will hear a brief discussion and take action on police staffing. and then we will hear from miss kelly kirkpatrick, discuss technical amendments and then we will have a board deliberations about the city-wide spending plan. so i want to encourage everyone that's here, that's curious, this is the day you want to be able to follow the co

i want to thank our friends at sfgovtv with assisting us with today kazz broadcast. our clerk is mr. victor young. to my far right is supervisor she heavy, to my right is supervisorp the far left is supervisor yee. mr. clerk, are there any announcements? >> clerk: yes. please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices. items acted upon today will appear on the june 5 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwisestated. >> supervisor cohen: all right. thank you very much. so colleagues, i want to thank everyone that's in the chamber with us today, not just my colleagues but the department heads and staff and members of the public. today marks the first hearing of what we will call the may 1 budget, which is 12 departments whose budgets are released in may, many of which are revenue generating and rely less on the general fund than do -- less on the general fund than the may -- excuse me, than the june 1st budget. so in these hearings, i hope to shed some light on wha ntsde are money on, both from a policy , l king at capital improvements and how many p