the way that i have proposed this legislation is that there is an sfmta staff decision. there is no change there. number two, there is a hearing. instead of the taxi commission or this board, it is in front of the hearing officers that are part of our sfmta staff and have experience in the various types of hearings. third, if you do not like that result, you can pay for a lawyer and go to court. i do not believe there is any limitation on due fact, i thinkd by the professionalism of our hearing section. if there is a problem with the perception of the fact that our hearing officers are within the sfmta, first of all, we face that with respect to all of our hearings. second, i want to refer you to our experience in one event where we had a hearing by the hearing section and there was strong, repeated requests for a rehearing. the staff referred that to an independent hearing officer of the rent board. $40,000 later, we had one decision. we are happy to follow any procedures of due process that this board and agency see fit to impose. we like due process and we like transp

e way that i have proposed this legislation is thathere is an sfmta staff decision. therenochange there. number two, there is a hearing. instead of the taxi commission or this oard, it is in front of the hearing ficers tt are part of our sfm staff and have experience in the various types result, you can pay for a awye and go to court. limitation on due fact, i thinkd hearin section. if there is a oblem with the perception of the fact that r hearing ficers arin the fa, first of all,we face that with respect to allf our hearings econd, i want toefer you to our experience in one event where we h a hearing by the strong, repeated requests for a rehearing. the staff referred that to an independent heing officer of the rent brd. $40,000 ter, had one decision. we are happy to follow any this board agency see fit to impose. we like due process and we like tnsparency. we like to get it done cctly an efficitly. evythingyou just describt for itbecaus makes nse.ubl transparency theseighly talkgabt people who own're permitsi wonderg if infrom t communi- amge shouldo is.not thi e

we do more than taxis at the sfmta in case of folks have forgotten. san francisco, this past week, was part of the kickoff of the green lanes project. it is a new project that is being launched by the foundation with the intent to bring more protected by ways to -- bike ways to u.s. cities. we were one of the cities chosen to participate in the project. it will be supporting development of these kinds of facilities and networks over the next two years. we were selected along with austin, chicago, memphis, portland, and washington, d.c. we had our kickoff last week in chicago, and were we were joined by the administrator of the federal highway administration. strong support from the u.s. to permit a transportation for this initiative. cities were recognized for their ambitious goals and their -- ambitious goals. we, for example, presented not just be recently implemented jfk bike way, but as well as the polk street project. we were selected also because of the quick work we have done since the injunction. people have been ty

it was to create a new logo for the sfmta for the next 100 years. the contest recently completed, and after review from public input, and a panel of judges, we had a winning logo that was selected at an event last tuesday night. it was a local artist or local graphic arts person who was the winning -- had the winning design. i think we will try to put it up on the screen for you so you can take a look. that was the winner. i do not remember the number, we got more than 40 submissions. we had hundreds of comments that this is what came out as the winner. we will be working with our internal staff, to implement this in various types of mta presence. this was done at zero cost to the taxpayers. we were able to leverage some of the best creative minds in the city. that is the way this process is supposed to work. i will just mention with regard to the part-time operators, since that has come up a little bit in the public, and it came up today, the part-time operators have worked and worked well and have helped to meet particular part of our service need

i want to thank the sfmta for these proposals to amend the code. we support this proposal to restrict contractor permits in front of the workplace. we have been in a partnership to manage part in for several years now. i have been privileged to be a part of that journey. we are at a time when every parking stall counts. one of the goals for parking meter management is that we can always find a stall in san francisco. that is done through dynamics. s that tell us the occupancy level at various times throughout the day. these contractor permits give a false reading. they allow for unrestricted use. there really is no way to regulate the permits. the port of san francisco now pays for parking citywide. suzanne and i issued parking at a city leader. we asked if they approved of this regulation and a proposal. they said they get paid for parking in front of the business. this would promote parking meter management goals in san francisco. thank you. >> that is the staff presentation. >> yes. >> that is what they claim? >> right. and that is in the tender

program (ltp) state transit assistance funds to the san francisco municipal transportation agency's (sfmta's) free muni for low income youth pilot program and concurring with the sfmta's ltp prop 1b project priorities, including a wait list project in case there are unneeded ltp prop 1b funds. this is an action item. commissioner campos: unless there are any questions -- this was an item that was considered by the plans and programs committee. is there anyone from the public that would like to comment on this item? sorry. we have speaker cards. >> [speaking spanish] >> midafternoon. -- good afternoon. i wanted to ask for your support of this funding. a lot of our families are low- income. we do not have other options for transporting ourselves. many of us have multiple children and to have to make multiple trips to pick up our children to and from school, and that makes it very expensive and difficult for us to be able to support our families in this way, so that is why we are asking for your support. commissioner campos: thank you. let me read a cue cards. angelina yu. jane martin. estella

if you would like me to call item nine, this will be on matters within the jurisdiction of the sfmta, but not on today's agenda. >> my name is cory lamb. it was not on the agenda today, but i would really like to bring up the issue of ubercab, a consistent born in our side. i understand there are some issues as to which jurisdiction that will fall under. they are not cabs. they are black towncars. they pick up passengers and functioning as taxis even when they are not doing uber business. i was on their twitter feeds and they quoted a price that was $85 from sfo to downtown. it clearly says, do not worry about it. hit a button and we will pick you up. no waiting, no checking in, no fees. this is not the airport commission, but they are not paying any fees there. they're not coming in here to pay the fees to operate. we do not know who they are driving. it is really disheartening as a cabdriver. trying to work and do everything that is supposed to be done legitimately, to lose a fair because i have a fair. there are three guys around the corner that do not and they jump into a black to

side of it, aside from the needs of the campaign, we see young people at the table now with sfpuc and sfmta. it will be a two-year pilot and we are hearing many students, many in middle school and high school, how they want a program to work. we have been working to design an education and outreach component. the education component is ready to kick off. surveys have been done with high school students and middle school students to understand the relationship with public transit, their needs, and hal muni can work for this demographic of young people. additionally, about which campaigns are being talked about by young people. they are asking, how can we let more young people know about this program? this is something that will build that sense of lifelong ridership that the ta cares about for the next generation of writers. >> thank you. next speaker. >> i am the chair of the san francisco youth commission. i have been involved in this topic since i have been on the youth commission. i want to be really clear, the funds for this program are coming -- the $400,000 that you will be voting on

i got to observe a lot of the bicycling infrastructure and culture in their with some sfmta staff. it was phenomenal, the things that we saw there. i would love to get an update or a report or something from staff that may have been there. at least have a follow-up meeting in terms of what we can do about changing the bike culture here in san francisco. develop the kind of support they have in and denmark for bicycling and the structure. -- infrastructure. those kinds of things cost money, up but there is support for it in the public in terms of prioritizing. bicycling over there is not seen as an environmental statement. it is not seen as exercise of quetta. it is just seen the way we might see a subcompact car, and mode of transportation. maybe we can further some discussions. >> and some of the alumni. director ramos: anyone that has been. >> i think it is an excellent idea. we can ask the director to schedule some sort of presentation in the near future. i am asking members of the board to concur in adjourning the meeting this morning in memory of chris heinicke. thank you. ok.

renew access transit liability personal injury and property damage insurance coverage, return the sfmta to complete self ensuring personal injury and property damage claims by third parties and placed on reserve the amount of the premiums for any such coverage to cloud cover future potential claims. >> i have read the written report and i understand a recommendation to be that we not renew the coverage. instead, we take the premium amount and put that aside in our reserve. i've spoken with the director offline about this too was polite enough to call me that i am in favor of having an excess liability coverage. i still favor that, but i will not jump up and down and do anything other than vote know. i respect the staff's recommendation. i have one question. how can we ensure good faith that we are setting aside money that would have been spent on a premium and not just calling money that we would have spent on the reserves, you know, how can we be assured that we are accruing an extra two or $3 million each year? maybe we maintain our reserve policy and say they are reserve policy apply

substantial completion. h/as we discussed, but i wantedo let you know that yesterday, we published on the sfmta web site, the collective bargaining agreements for which we had just completed negotiations. we are responsible for negotiating eight agreements in total, five of which are expiring in a couple of weeks at the end of this month. in conjunction with the city, we completed successor agreements for those five contracts. there were local 1021, international association of machinists, local 1414, the electrical workers local 6, and a very small unit of twu that represents one category of maintenance workers. we did reach agreement with all five of those. they generally have 31% wage increases to about the term of the contract. the timing of those increases it varies slightly. the previously emplace 12 furlough days have been eliminated. there are some modest welfare cost savings benefits. there were some incentive pay is that we eliminated. there were a number of language cleanup updates, such as eliminating committees and removing out dating or expiring language. those agreements were all

we are also very lucky to have a bunch of people from sfmta, many of them are here. my job is to introduce the awardees. please join me and give a hand for jay primus, george reynolds, steven lee, and lorraine fuqua. >> thank you. this is a tremendous honor. it really does feel fabulous to be recognized. one of the relief fund things about this project is that it is just complex enough and just big enough that it is truly a case where hundreds of people were required to really get it off the ground. there's really nothing -- that's the kind of thing we dream about. working shoulder to shoulder with that many people to make something happen. it has never happened before. what a pleasure. unfortunately, the mfac award is limited to four people. we are up here representing an entire team. some of that court team is here tonight, including lauren, alex, lisa foster, hank wilson, lesley, jason lee, and brendan monaghan. [applause] those are some of the folks -- those are just some of the folks that really made sfpark happen. i hope you have a chance tonight to meet and co

i would be remiss not to the acknowledge the wonderful staff that we have here at the sfmta. oftentimes, we do not get are just do. people remember the bad things that happen. i want to acknowledge the hard- working people that are so committed to this city and committed to delivering a viable transportation. i want to thank each and every one of you for the opportunity. i will most definitely be in touch. it is about sustainability. thank you, once again. [applause] >> we can move on to public comment on the directors' report. >> i want to ask a question about the director's report. we did talk about the issue of spare cabs. i think it would be a good idea to look at a protocol for when we can do this again. the u.s. open is not going to be the last big event we have. i appreciate your looking at that. thank you to the taxi community that brought this to the floor as the u.s. open was going on in conjunction with the bart issue. it speaks to the bigger issue of overall demand. we are doing a study on that right now. there was some concern raised that the folks doing the stud

business every year, starting with our title and presenting sponsor wells fargo, of entrepreneur sponsor sfmta. if you have seen that we have been able to promote small business to where we needed the attention. we wanted small business to know we were throwing a party and a weeklong celebration and a week- long opportunity to educate and inspire a small business. visa, at&t advertising solutions, a constant contact. recology, pacific gas and electric company, kaiser permanente, zero, chevron, and vertical response. >> t-mobile, microsoft office -- office 365, dynatech, veriphone, and our principal sponsor, it aaa flag and banner, fedex, and strauss event. seven by seven magazines, the bay citizens, san francisco business times, san francisco bay guardian, in the bay area reporter. let's get our sponsors and media sponsors a round of applause. [applause] >> we are here to solicit several small businesses tonight that have gone above and -- salute several small businesses denied that have gone above and beyond to open their stores, get on the phone, turn on their websites, and stand up as mento

of california transportation, and approval to move ahead with that that is being coordinated with sfmta transit effectiveness project. i will turn control of the presentation back to ben. >> i am going to touch on 83 projects. -- touch on 3 projects. the first one is the 19th avenue median idle planting project. this is planting in the median on 19th avenue between lincoln way. the construction project has been awarded, and the project is expected to be completed in february of 2013. i also want to touch on the sunset boulevard pedestrian safety and education project. this is to upgrade six intersections with accessible pedestrian signals along sunset boulevard and includes pedestrian our region education component. this is funded by prop. k. commissioner campos: commissioner chu, did you have a question? commissioner chu: i can wait until after the project. >> this project experienced delays in the design phase and issues in terms of getting the construction obligation approved. we were able to work with mta staff to shift the construction project from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2

call sfmta accessible services at 415-701-4485 for copies.

the idea that the sfmta would take $20 million per year, tried to take $20 million per year, from some of the poorest-paid, blue-collar workers in the city, and use it to pay for the salaries and benefits of some of the best-paid, blue-collar workers in the country, is just unthinkable to us. we have no overtime, sick pay, vacation pay, no health care. we have no retirement plans, no paychecks. that this money would be extracted from lost to go elsewhere is unthinkable. it will never go down. we will come back here in a few years if this continues. we will come back here in a few years and it will be just the same. the idea that the cab industry, this vital industry of 5000 active drivers, should be a subset of the finance department of the mta is absolutely unacceptable. thank you. >> i just left out a thing for the request for writ. vice chairman brinkman: u.s. party had your chance to speak. thank you. >> i am on the taxi advisory council. i wanted to say that i think the taxi advisory council, although the task of figuring out what to do with medallions is pretty much over, you sho