sfmta board showed its leadership in putting its money where it its mouth was, investing our local ofedding dollars into the maintenance of a system that supports the larger state of good repair investment that is so strongly and luckily -- and welcome to. sleep plays to bring up a representative from our board, the vice chairman of the board -- i am pleased to bring up a representative from our board. >> thank you, good morning. on behalf of the a 70 board of directors, want to thank the deputy administrator and the fta for providing this critical funds. i also want to thank our congressional delegation for their efforts to fight for funds to keep trends in moving throughout our region, not/i our city, and providing bluer skies and better access for all. a big thank you to local leadership, mayor lee and supervisor campos, who was not here, represented by jose luis. especially this supervisors capacity as chair of the transportationwmnçqzr(uáhority d improving muni and making it a transit choice of people want to take instead of transportation of last resort. both grant awards more t

mta board in january of this year, and the five-year capital improvement program, adopted by the sfmta board in april of this year. as maria mentioned we are at the beginning of replacing our entire transit fleet. this is a good time to give you context for requests coming before you in the coming months and years. i will give you a quick overview of our fleet. the purpose of the plan, how we estimate the number of vehicles that are e choired, estimated capital cost and where we are going from here. so mta has over 2,400 vehicles it owns and operators. over 1,000 are the transit vehicles that are the subject of this presentation but there are a large number of other vehicles we manage and maintain. most significantly there are other support vehicles, like for rail, maintenance staff and the like. so the transit fleet management plan is our 20-year look ahead to understand what vehicles we will need to provide the service demanded in san francisco. it also identified what investments are needed to deliver that service in terms of the fleet. this becomes a basis for a number of long-range docu

chair, members of board, supervisor chu, bonds yee from the sfmta. i think supervisor chu said it very well. i couldn't possibly add anymore to what she has detailed. but i do want to emphasize that this is a pilot that we're proposing. and we're very mindful of the double-edged sword type of impact it could have on outside residents and businesses. so we're going to be very careful in working with you and businesses and everyone else impacted by this so select the locations that are going to be the most impacted by this proposed pilot. before-and-after evaluation, to )guq ",ñonly going to be implementing this regulation on streets that are going to be specifically signed.q;bi gb as in terms of the signage that is needed to effectuate this change. and i will be glad to answer c9ñ may have. >> actually, i did want to say that i really appreciate the map that was proved on one of the mta drafts this shows the most impacts areas seem to be district 10, 4 and 6 were about 80% of the identified 461 vehicles are located. and there is more minimal impacts,

heard from the small business commission and sfmta in support of the ordinance as representative of the pdr uses and it was recommended approval to the boardthe other item at committee was the car wash ordinance. this was supervisor olague's proposal that would allow existing gas stations along 19th avenue of a certain size to add the automated car washes. you voted to recommend approval with some modifications. and you recommended modification on this one was that it be amended to ensure that a lot merger or lot assembly was not included with the project. supervisor olague did not include this modification. she felt it was sufficient to ensure that car washes were compatible with the character of the neighborhood. land use recommended approval of the ordinance as drafted. then there was one item, the chinese hospital, which we told you about last week. that was on second reading so it did finally pass through the board approval this week for the last reading. there are several new ordinances that i'll mention to you. and all the planning code amendments will come before this body for a hearing upon the first is upper market zoning map ame

in conclusion, the sfmta has failed to make its case and has made too many sloppy errors that look bad for them, we urge this board to uphold the public trust in government and to reject the proposed revocation, additionally, since our understanding is that this board can only reject or accept the penalty proposed and since the monetary fine is part and parcel of it, we highly recommend that the strangely calculated monetary penalty would also be overturned. i'm available to answer questions, mr. kipnis, the permit holder is here as well, and mr. boris whose declaration is here is available to answer questions that this board may have for him as well as if the department wishes to cross examine him. >> thank you. >> may i submit mr. shamis's deck -- declaration. >> this should have been part of the package for your declaration. >> why was this not submitted? >> i just met mr. shamis tonight. >> okay. >> and you've provided a copy to mr. murray. >> yes, i provided a copy to him before this item was called. >> okay. >> mr. murray? >> good evening, commissioners. jarvis murray, this matter relates to the revocation o