schedule and the departments to invite i wanted to make sure that we in agreement that will be the sfmta mta and dpw and planning and oewd in regards to working with the private developers. >> can we make sure that's a meeting in the evening most of the impacts are during the daytime so it would be invites to have that opportunity for them to come. >> all right. 0 that's the march 23rd meeting so just want to make sure you know. >> no. >> the earlier, one. >> i'm sorry march 9. >> okay. >> thank you for that correction i switched the meeting dates so overview as i understand you want coordination of major projects and so, so there's a master coordination plan for projects and you know does that master plan work also exclude private projects and then you know does the city like we have a gun control o good neighbor policy for the city's do they have a good neighbor policy would each the departments ask that in time for the private investment and wanting to know prongs is there sort of a last number of years you'd like to get some look at the number of projects the department has done over the

schedule and the departments to invite i wanted to make sure that we in agreement that will be the sfmta mta and dpw and planning and oewd in regards to working with the private developers. >> can we make sure that's a meeting in the evening most of the impacts are during the daytime so it would be invites to have that opportunity for them to come. >> all right. 0 that's the march 23rd meeting so

some lefty placements can you identify. >> in terms of identifying we have staff from sfmta happy to - >> jonathan with mta there's a couple of criteria we consider first when look at our walk first cords in specific locations where we're had injuries in the past and second doing the flashing beacons it takes time to put in a traffic signal so this is effective when we might want to go to a traffic signal in the future this demonstrates the cars to slow down to help the pedestrians based on those criteria looking at whether or not it's on the corridor or past collisions we'll use to locate those. >> thank you and we're joined by supervisor farrell. >>

. >> in terms of identifying we have staff from sfmta happy to - >> jonathan with mta there's a couple of criteria we consider first when look at our walk first cords in specific locations where we're had injuries in the past and second doing the flashing beacons it takes time to put in a traffic signal so this is effective when we might want to go to a traffic signal in the future this demonstrates the cars to slow down to help the pedestrians based on those criteria looking at whether or not it's on the corridor or past collisions we'll use to locate those. >> thank you and we're joined by supervisor farrell. >> the next request i'll just is for franklin signal upgrades our the request at a total of 32 locations on franklin and embarcadero some of the ones are on the walk first, they rank highly for the specific types of improvements the goal to bring the signals up to a higher standard of focus so the intersections will be upgraded to better view and maps installed to so the pedestrian signals will be at the intersection where no one exist other upgrades have the signal upgrades and

supervisor mar for your leadership in working with our agency staff sweetheart the sfmta staff in addition, we expect the mta to come in with design fund anticipating a certification of the environmental impact report in the first quarter in the meantime the bus transit connects the outer neighborhood as supervisor tang mentioned in district 10 but it connects our western neighborhoods in district 7 through district 11 and connects 9 and 10 that project continues in daily city and san francisco neighborhoods neighborhood transportation improvement program this think an initiative that was spearheaded through the update and urging the supervisor avalos our chair to identify the need to develop a pipeline of planning promotions and planning efforts to be more inclusive to insure there was full involvement in the community and identify $100,000 in planning fund per district to be applied to improve the process to educate and built capacity to the level of advocate to develop the capital projects in every district particularly to address the safety needs we've found in the access to regional services those are s

we're charged with programming $5.1 million bart and sfmta are also charged with administrative review their own transportation funding $6.1 million for mta and $4.6 million for bart this is the summary of the remedies that came out of our committee we are recommending two projects to receive and two not to receive funding the elevation panel used a number of criteria to elevate all the projects they looked at which ones the community identified and the formation plan and the feasibility of the plan and the cost effectiveness and what kind of outreach that happened and also a whole the renditions for the geography diversity so the first project we're recommending for funding is $300,000 in the potrero hill area this is coming out of the potrero hill transportation plan that the transportation authority is looking at right now and as well as the coercion of the sfmta this would fund the design through the pavement to parks project that is being administered by the parks and planning and it is quick and easy to implement and will be complete by the end of this year the second project expanding the project for the remaining lifeline funding

the program and does not have an rtc card they lrp need to visit the mta discount id office which is just across the street from sfmta customer service center to apply for the rtc card. this can take between four and five weeks to get approved. once the customer is approved for their card they'll get an application at the office or get one online and apply for the free program. there's a list of our outreach calendar. we met with the department of aging and adult services staff yesterday to receive feedback. we're here this morning to present to you our process and receive any feedback and for the next two weeks, including the mt action board of directors meeting, will be meeting with different groups to make sure we're doing the proper amount of outreach and if we're missing anything we fill in the holeses. besides additional outreach besides those meetings current sf registered rtc customers will be direct mail letting them know the program is approved. and the application will be on the back of that letter. applications and fact sheets we made available at different communities and stakeholder groups. we'll have n

is a program underway currently with sfmta but one possibility for the board of supervisors to consider is enhancing that program additional funding or reallocating mta resources so that the program is expanded and finally the 6th alternative is a combination of all of the above advocating changes in state law to allow the city more flexibility in controlling its own speed limits and making changes to these speed limits and enhancing enforcement either through traditional means or through automated speed enforcement were allowed by state law by that means also and then expanding and enhancing the current traffic calming efforts. so that is a summary of the report and we're here and happy to answer any questions. >> supervisor christensen. >> i have a question i certainly support chairman mar's support i don't want to put you on the spot i had a couple of questions based on this pretty dramatic to see the change from 1990 continuing all the way the way to 2005 so 15 years of very steady reduction was there any indication on the data whether we got to be better drivers over those years or whether there were measures on the part of the city that might h

sfmta sustainable streets tom maguire. >> thank you, commissioners it is great to be here this afternoon that is the absolutely number one priority 2014-2015 for the mta we've got a broad range of materials we'll be starting with tim pitching for megan he'll be talking about the research about the refined high energy network it is an important data many undermines the strategy and you'll come back and talk about the engineering product delivery and the education underway and talk about some of the policies o policy rules we have that be coming out of the vision zero task force over the next couple of years with that, i'm going to turn it over to timothy talking about the new data natural lyrics. >> good afternoon, commissioners timothy with mta unfortunately megan can't be here she has a home situation i'm going to go over the updates the network which we've made tremendous progress a couple of years ago just quick you background in 2011, we started working on gathering the data on the resources and we went from intersection data to the correlation with crossroads there's on overlap of neighbors one thing we saw we added in some additional data that c

we appreciate working with the mta to do that on the delivery side we begin about ground zero our citywide priority i can report that the actions are meeting constantly sfmta the public health and planning and public works all of us focused on the delivery of those first 24 projects and identifying the next set of projects to come to aid xerox we've got support for funding and low cost and continue to see those for the implementation if in the bike does the $250,000 campaign that's charging the vehicle drivers i look forward to the work of that committee in the coming year and zooming to the larger projects the presidio parkway is making progress in the field i'm excited we'll we'll see traffic switch into the new facility i look forward to inviting you will have you to that milestone and celebrate with our government partners for the link concession golden link partners building the project on the ground our yerba buena island is making significant process it's hard to see the work go caltrain is dismantling the older bridge but it is a $50 million project it is just going trooems well, i'm grateful to greg our pb construction managers this is the idea of

read is superseded by a mta is offering to put together a urban lateral putting in stone the modifications taking into account the residents concerns so at that i want to refer to sfmta to kind of go over their clarifications how they came about and where they stand in terms of 6 their windows that's all i have i want to defer to them. >> one question you indicated the permit has no sound litigants but the contract does. >> the contract says we are to apply and obtain a permit in the noise level below came bitten. >> your contract says 5 gaza over ambient. >> we're to obtain a permit it's a different interpretation 0 that's how we read that. >> could you address what the appellant discussed in terms of the minor dpifdz between you. >> the main issue is the we agree that those back up left arms are a feasible option and proposal their initially concerned with since we did a test that's an acceptable solution with the toikz then they'll want to rise that the main contention putting a specific name to it a reading what we prefer i believe to say we'll use the exact left arms it is called an 82 dba alarm the reading vary so it requires a stringent stringent dba reading.