most of them have been reported to the sfpd. those are the ones that we track, the ones that we are taking action on. supervisor mirkarimi: because the numbers seem to be substantial, at least that is what is anecdotally reported by the press. there is a columnist here and they're suggesting this. it really is a significant number. therefore, the interpretation is we have a loss for it -- officers that are spending a lot of time writing citations for those violations. i just think it is important to line up those statistics that were missing in the discussion. >> i will make sure in my next report i bring those extractions to you. >> and you can walk us through how that is administered. that would be great. supervisor chiu: just to add to that, i know in the conversation that we had previously, a lot of us had requested information on quality of life. we never got a response, so i would add to super bears and mirkarimi, that we are happy to ask -- supervisor mirkarimi, that we are happy to ask for this information. in "the chron

most of them have been reported to the sfpd. those are the ones that we track, the ones that we are ta a

all information and copies of the order were sent to the sfpd command staff and bay view station and as of now they're in compliance with the list of additional safety conditions and i will take questions about that. i don't have any information on the incident per se. but i'm happy to take questions on awful my report or the order that we issued. vice chair joseph: i just have one question. the commissioner, does he have to be sworn before he can be seated? >> that is a good question. i don't know. president newlin: i don't think so. >> he's a board appointment so commission, so, commissioner meekow, were you sworn in as a board appointed -- do you remember? commissioner meko: not the second time. not on the reappointment. the entire commission was sworn by supervisor -- vice chair joseph: i was sworn in by lilly brown. commissioner meko: tony hall administered the oath at our first meetinging. >> tony hall? vice chair joseph: no. president newlin: we can get an answer from the city attorney. >> i will find out for you. vice chair joseph: to that end, if the mayor is not around, who

during its 30-day period it was reviewed and commented on by the small business commission and by the sfpd. it's in process by this commission as well and you'll hear about phthalater. some changes have been requested. the staff has not yet obtained a revised copy with those changes. so as soon as i do, i can indicate to the commission, although we might actually again do that through the ad hoc committee process so that you are up to date on any kind of amendments that might come forward. but in any case, a revised version will be presented as the public safety committee mid november and then there will be opportunity again to provide input to the supervisor. regarding halloween, which is almost upon us, similar to last year, and i said this to you a month ago when we met, we continue to work closely with sfpd at all levels, at the stations and at command staff, to assist in the creation of a near-complete list of the events happening over the halloween weekend. it's obviously a long weekend of friday, saturday and sunday events. in addition we will have the world series occurring, albeit

we have been working with sfpd and the people and working with the people themselves. there is theho hookah. you will see that there are two minor incidences. there was a drug offense, but that happened outside. because this was venue related, it does follow technically under our per year note. the actual offense happened outside. we had another one at the parlor. the report was a little dubious. somebody was sent to the hospital. it looked like it did not happen there and it may have happened at a different location. and that is about it unless there are any questions. president newlin: thank you. >> you guys have done this before. we have never done it for a hotel. and also, this has gotten a lot of legislation lately, whether it is the alcohol mitigation or other legislation or whenever, i would like its staff could formulate a memo or a request and take it to the comptroller's office, because i think this commission should have an economic analysis of entertainment and night life in this down, and its three -- in regard to the senses, that should be easy. with rega

. >> i'm assigned to the sfpd ples unit, which stands for police law enforcement services. we work closely with the film commission regarding any filming that occurs in san francisco outside of any news-related items, and all our items fall outside of the san francisco administrative code. in january of this year, the san francisco police department entered into productions with kki productions for filming that would occur within san francisco involving san francisco police officers. an agreement was reached between the film commission through the city attorney's office and kki productions. i believe you have a copy of that agreement in front of you. exhibit d, subsection -- i believe is 10, part of the agreement is that two vehicles would be give to the san francisco police apartment and will fall under the general fleet for the sfpd. filming has concluded, and we are trying to fulfil this agreement. supervisor chu: 90, and the type of vehicle that has been gifted -- is this for general use, is this a police officer vehicle? what kind of vehicle is it? >> vehicles are desc

pd -- sfpd compared to violent and other crimes. but these things are very important to the residence in our neighborhood. the other thing that came to my attention yesterday while i was watching the entertainment commission meeting -- there was some legislation being worked on. there was a new police recommendation for all permits issued by the entertainment commissioned for the news and events with eight anticipated occupancy over 100 people. our nighttime entertainment industry is important to our economy. it is very present in south of market. one commissioner is specifically there to represent neighborhood interests, and he was not involved in the process of writing this legislation, only commissioner joseph and the president of the commission, who i believe represents sfpd. just observing the meeting, the commander who was presenting it seemed very dismissive of the importance of neighborhood input. i would hope that the sfpd values neighborhood input in the riding of legislation rather than just giving us peanuts at the end o

this is seriously said and sfpd officers are getting intact. there is nothing being done about it. that is my basic request. we need more officers, anything. please make a note of this. write it down or something. there needs to be more people, adding this threat all the time. -- combatting this threat all the time. president marshall: lieutenant, will you please call item number three? >> reports to the commission. president marshall: beginning with the chief report. >> [inaudible] we continue to be at a 9% reduction year-to-date. it is a 10% reduction for property crimes, 4% reduction in violent crimes. we did have a slight uptick for the cycle representing a 7% increase, a total of 34 crimes. that is primarily in the area of robberies, and a small uptick in the area of aggravated assault -- aggravated assault. for the total wheat, we were down 11%. we continue to be at a pace year to date. all the violent crimes are down, except for personal theft. this particular cycle shows that we are even, and that number will go up and down. we are at 37 against 38. it puts us down to the 1

. >> the city and the sfpd -- this is wasting taxpayer money. the sfpoa is doing this to screw people out of our hard-earned tax paying money. i worked on vega and howard street. i'm a taxpayer. i don't live here anymore, but i'm concerned. >> please move onto the next item. >> item 6. routine administrative business. commission announcement. commissioner hammer: announcement? >> no. >> 6 f b. >> scheduling ever items identified for consideration at future commission meetings. >> we have some items we set in our priority list. what i would like to do is if we had several items we thought were first priorities or a priority. maybe if we can schedule one or two of those matters this evening for down the road in november and december, and -- and i agree with commissioner dejesus, we should do that off line. for this evening, it seems like we packed the agenda and we have a full agenda, but for our next meeting, let's start getting those matters on calendar. thank you. any comment? hearing none, thank you. let's move onto the next item. >> item 7 is

thirdly, i would like to say the fraud detail at the sfpd need more support. my neighbors and i are still trying to follow up on an important case involving our neighborhood, but with the work overload, we cannot get any answers, so i guess we have to sit patiently and see what ever happens to this case, since it involves influential citizens of district 7. my last comment is, in terms of crime in san francisco, we need to act more forcefully against people who tried to intimidate others. intimidation has been an under stressed crime issue. from my own experience, i feel like to many people attempt intimidation -- thank you. supervisor chiu: thank you, next speaker. >> my name is francisco dacosta. one of the main purposes of the meeting is for the constituents at home to get an idea of what is happening around the city and county of san francisco. i want to bring your attention to a document where one of the supervisors participated and spent $400,000 regarding community policing. so it is ok for us to spend $400,000 on this document, but from time to time, w