helps mitigate the impact of the p cia request ton cca programs and p cia customers and finally the sfpuc urged the p cia to reexamine the calculation method and the application to cleanpowersf program and other cca programs in state law requires that the investor on collect this fee to maintain the differences for the remaining customers to other domineers departing the san francisco public utilities commission it in challenge it san franciscans san francisco is made up of bundled customers and you know customers that will join the cca program we need to keep both the ratepayer groups incomes and we're asking the california public utilities commission to do the same they should be keeping in mind the bundled customers by the but the cca customers it is not at all unusual for the california public utilities commission to apply it's practice on a rate making issue and see the result oh, that is has a heavier impact on customers and rate payers than we think is appropriate quarry moderate that the puc resolution requests them here and the resolution bra requests the california public utilit

thank you. >> we heard from the sfpuc hearing they'll been losing be potentially 8 and a half million dollars in this the plaintiff cia increase goes through we've think thinking how to use this money back into the promissory note program we tell them the mask of the community choices going devotes this is is transfer of wealth and for money for build outs going instead to a maneuver in a conceptual way it is poor planning by this year corporation to be back stomped by the public not happening in any other industry i'll back up under brooks we need to look at the blunt of this but the funding of the p cia thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> dashing through the snow in a solar powder slay over the city hills we go green power all the way. >> bells are again to ring keeping spirits bright and bright i hope the item turn out right hope that goes well and hope it is swell and hope it sells oh, what fun to ride in a solar powder sleigh offering oh, no place like solar and green be able for the holidays and no matter how far away you room if you want to be economical

thank you. >> we heard from the sfpuc hearing they'll been losing be potentially 8 and a half million dollars in this the plaintiff cia increase goes through we've think thinking how to use this money back into the promissory note program we tell them the mask of the community choices going devotes this is is transfer of wealth and for money for build outs going instead to a maneuver in a conceptual way it is poor planning by this year corporation to be back stomped by the public not happening in any other industry i'll back up under brooks we need to look at the blunt of this but the funding of the p cia thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> dashing through the snow in a solar powder slay over the city hills we go green power all the way. >> bells are again to ring keeping spirits bright and bright i hope the item turn out right hope that goes well and hope it is swell and hope it sells oh, what fun to ride in a solar powder sleigh offering oh, no place like solar and green be able for the holidays and no matter how far away you room if you want to be economical

thank you. >> we heard from the sfpuc hearing they'll been losing be potentially 8 and a half million dollars in this the plaintiff cia increase goes through we've think thinking how to use this money back into the promissory note program we tell them the mask of the community choices going devotes this is is transfer of wealth and for money for build outs going instead to a maneuver in a conceptual way it is poor planning by this year corporation to be back stomped by the public not happening in any other industry i'll back up under brooks we need to look at the blunt of this but the funding of the p cia thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> dashing through the snow in a solar powder slay over the city hills we go green power all the way. >> bells are again to ring keeping spirits bright and bright i hope the item turn out right hope that goes well and hope it is swell and hope it sells oh, what fun to ride in a solar powder sleigh offering oh, no place like solar and green be able for the holidays and no matter how far away you room if you want to be economical

. >> thanks jed from 350 sf again, we had a good meeting with staff and i think the sfpuc meeting on tuesday was a positive one i just really wanted to give from an outside prospective kind of back up with director fried said you know the sfpuc staff is under pressure from their commission from members of the commission to really look at the worst of the worst and protect basically the rest of the power enterprise that could happen to clean power i think that it is important to keep an eye on on the fact that puc really potentially taking more direct measures to halt the launch of this program than previously but i think at this point the way for us to move forward is to hopefully do this together outside organizations the board of supervisors, lafco and the sfpuc to basically move forward as a city tee help undermine what the correspondence of the regulated monopoly might be don't go certainly they can watch those meetings and everything is out in public verse the redacted record we say early i expect when the rates come out in january they'll specifically be geared to take a loss f

thank you. >> we heard from the sfpuc hearing they'll been losing be potentially 8 and a half millionllars in this the plaintiff cia increase goes through we've think thinking how to use this money back into the promissory note program we tell them the mask of the community choices going devotes this is is transfer of wealth and for money for build outs going instead to a maneuver in a conceptual way it is poor planning by this year corporation to be back stomped by the public not happening in any other industry i'll back up under brooks we need to look at the blunt of this but the funding of the p cia thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> dashing through the snow in a solar powder slay over the city hills we go green power all the way. >> bells are again to ring keeping spirits bright and bright i hope the item turn out right hope that goes well and hope it is swell and hope it sells oh, what fun to ride in a solar powder sleigh offering oh, no place like solar and green be able for the holidays and no matter how far away you room if you want to be economical in

environment to think about green house gas emissions so i want to point out that the pucs our puc sfpuc go solar with the metering has installed the 7 hundreds plus solar installations in addition those are providing about 23 megawatts of capacity the late number and want to make the point we've been employing people prosecute disadvantaged community in those programs as well as installing solar throughout the city including the southeast and other parts of city that are lower income and finally the point i think not been in the comments before those improve the reliance we're working on a project to provide batteries and scombrrg storage to back up the systems when we have a major broad-based quarter we have resources that will come from rooftop solar not a solar installation in the valley the more we can do to put the solar on our rooftops that improve our conditions here thank you. >> thank you. >> so chair avalos to have public safety and neighborhood chair wiener to take the a good deal of and read in the amendments those amendments are a quick synopsis they are clarifying and clea

thank you. >> we heard from the sfpuc hearing they'll been losing be potentially 8 and a half million dollars in this the plaintiff cia increase goes through we've think thinking how to use this money back into the promissory note program we tell them the mask of the community choices going devotes this is is transfer of wealth and for money for build outs going instead to a maneuver in a conceptual way it is poor planning by this year corporation to be back stomped by the public not happening in any other industry i'll back up under brooks we need to look at the blunt of this but the funding of the p cia thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> dashing through the snow in a solar powder slay over the city hills we go green power all the way. >> bells are again to ring keeping spirits bright and bright i hope the item turn out right hope that goes well and hope it is swell and hope it sells oh, what fun to ride in a solar powder sleigh offering oh, no place like solar and green be able for the holidays and no matter how far away you room if you want to be economical

. >> this disagrees situation my residents find a repeated patterns of misleading patterns if sfpuc ando the commission i'd like to point out an example in the document interest from mccain republican how to the public utilities commission it admits that how point number 2 states how that there is not much risk for over flow health implementations a great risk to that ocean documents that they have health hazards one of the ways in which this is a misleading situation by sfpuc officials a dangerous situation toxic sewage the commission not to stop lloyd they say in the report we're asking for them to stop discharging raw sewage into our homes and businesses a major problem needs to be addressed immediately thank you for your time. >> thank you. >> good afternoon good afternoon, commissioners my name is david i serve as the president thought terrace on the screen if i could go to the one particular photo i would like you to see the one on the top here this is the sewage clear up and they are wearing hazmat suits osha requires they be prepared to deal with raw sewage so when you received

the sfpuc paid the transmission charge. in the past through pg&e through an agreement that expired on june 30, 2015. the estimated iso transmission charge is now approximately $20 million a year. these new charges require that the contract capacity increase by $100 million over the next five years to cover these additional costs. the sfpuc power enterprise budgeted for these increases. the total cost will had been paid to the iso through the apx pass r pass-through charge after it's occurred. they don't receive any fee from this. apx paid the iso transmission charges for july and august 2015 from the existing $5 million contract. since the apx will not have sufficient funding for the scheduling coordination and consulting support sfertses and activities and we support the budget analyst's recommendation to amend the resolution to provide retroactive authority to cover the payments to the california iso. this concludes my presentation and i am happy to answer any questions. >> thanks and this is on behalf of the supervisor t

the sfpuc paid the transmission charge. in the past through pg&e through an agreement that expired on june 30, 2015. the estimated iso transmission charge is now approximately $20 million a year. these new charges require that the contract capacity increase by $100 million over the next five years to cover these additional costs. the sfpuc power enterprise budgeted for these increases. the total cost will had been paid to the iso through the apx pass r pass-through charge after it's occurred. they don't receive any fee from this. apx paid the iso transmission charges for july and august 2015 from the existing $5 million contract. since the apx will not have sufficient funding for the scheduling coordination and consulting support sfertses and activities and we support the budget analyst's recommendation to amend the resolution to provide retroactive authority to cover the payments to the california iso. this concludes my presentation and i am happy to answer any questions. >> thanks and this is on behalf of the supervisor t

we've taken that benchmark year list and we have combined it with the list of adoption years for the sfpuc so the list of benchmark years in the provision are just a little bit later than the benchmark years in the sfpuc 41 simply it took some time for san francisco 0 actually adopt the code that invoked the codes in the benchmark years other than that clarification and slight shift is it so essentially the benchmark in s c-41 we're proposing to replace that arbitrary dates with the dates that depends on the type of building caps. >> make sense. >> a list of dates now. >> so a table now. >> the structure is alternated and increased by 34 changes by a certain time limit to meet the standards. >> the dates pertain to when the building was brought into compliance with the code if we take for example, go letting pull one of these up here - and look at the say the very first thing wood-frame building residential wood frame the date is january 1st, 1984, so if the building in question was permitted on or after that date or has been retrieved in compliance with the code on or after that date it t

loaf people not only impacts us but impacting the pg&e program they're charged the p cia what the sfpuce care about chair mar our people good examples why we need changes i hope utilizing you'll vote yes own is resolution today, i heard about the comments things that are forward thinking i'm appreciative of those make sure we're not getting too far ahead but voting. >> yes. and brought up good ideas make sure we're not excluding people anyone if gets the go solar funds this be part of p cia to provide energy they'll be agreed to first on the wait list for the next customers that come in and once pg&e agrees they'll not opt out probable legislation or something that needs to be worked out with the city attorney's office and commissioner vice president moran i'm more than happy to sit down good ideas how we can do that if you go back to 2008 land use commission that is how long ago people were thinking about this tied together it is appropriate to have go solar customer hetch hetchy full power or treasure island or like me at hunters point and that maybe legislation needed i'll encourage

we've taken that benchmark year list and we have combined it with the list of adoption years for the sfpuc so the list of benchmark years in the provision are just a little bit later than the benchmark years in the sfpuc 41 simply it took some time for san francisco 0 actually adopt the code that invoked the codes in the benchmark years other than that clarification and slight shift is it so essentially the benchmark in s c-41 we're proposing to replace that arbitrary dates with the dates that depends on the type of building caps. >> make sense. >> a list of dates now. >> so a table now. >> the structure is alternated and increased by 34 changes by a certain time limit to meet the standards. >> the dates pertain to when the building was brought into compliance with the code if we take for example, go letting pull one of these up here - and look at the say the very first thing wood-frame building residential wood frame the date is january 1st, 1984, so if the building in question was permitted on or after that date or has been retrieved in compliance with the code on or after that date it t

and other private companies and nonprofits a new program is our efforts to promote and insure the sfpuc is around services and stewardship and lastly our winners with commission hopefully event yaesh as you may know the creation of a new puc is a priority for commissioner courtney want to thank his leadership in this development of this program and look forward to working with the commission and commissioner courtney in developing the details of the program in the fall. >> great, thank you it sounds like a wonderful new program i too want to thank county on his leadership would you like to say anything. >> if that's okay to the chair i too represent the workers and staff and carmen because going beyond puc staff is absolutely appropriate given the great work for the utilities by nonprofits and contractors and developers, etc. especially with the sources of the improvement coming up i'm enthusiastic about alu all of is participating in those events we do it in so many vrpts an antidote they're big boys and nothing phases them until you talk to them they like that insurance thing when it

city's community choice aggregation program, cleanpowersf, and authorizing the general manager of the sfpuc to deviate from certain otherwise applicable requirements of city law in such agreementsity clerk: sf 201234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is approved. item 21. city clerk: [accept and expend grants - trust for public land - joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza") playgrounds - $10,000,000] sponsor: mayor resolution retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept and expend grants of up to $10,000,000 from the trust for public land for design and reconstruction of the playgrounds at the joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza"), and approving grant agreements with the trust for public land for acceptance and performance of the grant services for the project term of november 5, 2014, through january 31, 2017. ity clerk: sf 211234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is ap

city's community choice aggregation program, cleanpowersf, and authorizing the general manager of the sfpuc to deviate from certain otherwise applicable requirements of city law in such agreementsity clerk: sf 201234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is approved. item 21. city clerk: [accept and expend grants - trust for public land - joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza") playgrounds - $10,000,000] sponsor: mayor resolution retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept and expend grants of up to $10,000,000 from the trust for public land for design and reconstruction of the playgrounds at the joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza"), and approving grant agreements with the trust for public land for acceptance and performance of the grant services for the project term of november 5, 2014, through january 31, 2017. ity clerk: sf 211234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is ap

city's community choice aggregation program, cleanpowersf, and authorizing the general manager of the sfpuc to deviate from certain otherwise applicable requirements of city law in such agreementsity clerk: sf 201234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is approved. item 21. city clerk: [accept and expend grants - trust for public land - joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza") playgrounds - $10,000,000] sponsor: mayor resolution retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept and expend grants of up to $10,000,000 from the trust for public land for design and reconstruction of the playgrounds at the joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza"), and approving grant agreements with the trust for public land for acceptance and performance of the grant services for the project term of november 5, 2014, through january 31, 2017. ity clerk: sf 211234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is ap

and other private companies and nonprofits a new program is our efforts to promote and insure the sfpuc is around services and stewardship and lastly our winners with commission hopefully event yaesh as you may know the creation of a new puc is a priority for commissioner courtney want to thank his leadership in this development of this program and look forward to working with the commission and commissioner courtney in developing the details of the program in the fall. >> great, thank you it sounds like a wonderful new program i too want to thank county on his leadership would you like to say anything. >> if that's okay to the chair i too represent the workers and staff and carmen because going beyond puc staff is absolutely appropriate given the great work for the utilities by nonprofits and contractors and developers, etc. especially with the sources of the improvement coming up i'm enthusiastic about alu all of is participating in those events we do it in so many vrpts an antidote they're big boys and nothing phases them until you talk to them they like that insurance thing when it

measure is expedited many thanks to commissioner mccarthy and thing thank to the fire department and the sfpuc who had the final merging the board ordered interagency task force on and on over the next month they'll finalize their recommendations and get back to the board with the fire and life safety in multi-unit buildings that are at risk for serious injuries and finally to the staff to have the blow quarter 3, 2015 please send in our nomination to william at sfgov.org as soon as possible to allow the recommendation committee to have the december meeting mr. secretary that concludes any announcements. >> any quo on the president announcements. >> the bic will take public comment within the jurisdiction not part of agenda. >> seeing none, on to item 4 discussion and possible action to approve a member of the code and 5150s for the engineer fee appointment recommended by the nomination subcommittee is bryan expiring august 2016. >> commissioner. commissioner lee or commissioner melgar. >> the nominations the committee met 10 days ago i suppose we drilled bryan sandra on his desire and willing

city's community choice aggregation program, cleanpowersf, and authorizing the general manager of the sfpuc to deviate from certain otherwise applicable requirements of city law in such agreementsity clerk: sf 201234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is approved. item 21. city clerk: [accept and expend grants - trust for public land - joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza") playgrounds - $10,000,000] sponsor: mayor resolution retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept and expend grants of up to $10,000,000 from the trust for public land for design and reconstruction of the playgrounds at the joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza"), and approving grant agreements with the trust for public land for acceptance and performance of the grant services for the project term of november 5, 2014, through january 31, 2017. ity clerk: sf 211234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is ap

city's community choice aggregation program, cleanpowersf, and authorizing the general manager of the sfpuc to deviate from certain otherwise applicable requirements of city law in such agreementsity clerk: sf 201234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is approved. item 21. city clerk: [accept and expend grants - trust for public land - joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza") playgrounds - $10,000,000] sponsor: mayor resolution retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept and expend grants of up to $10,000,000 from the trust for public land for design and reconstruction of the playgrounds at the joseph l. alioto performing arts piazza ("civic center plaza"), and approving grant agreements with the trust for public land for acceptance and performance of the grant services for the project term of november 5, 2014, through january 31, 2017. ity clerk: sf 211234 supervisor london breed: colleagues, can we take this item same house same call. without objection this item is ap

we've taken that benchmark year list and we have combined it with the list of adoption years for the sfpucrs in the provision are just a little bit later than the benchmark years in the sfpuc 41 simply it took some time for san francisco 0 actually adopt the code that invoked the codes in the benchmark years other than that clarification and slight shift is it so essentially the benchmark in s c-41 we're proposing to replace that arbitrary dates with the dates that depends on the type of building caps. >> make sense. >> a list of dates now. >> so a table now. >> the structure is alternated and increased by 34 changes by a certain time limit to meet the standards. >> the dates pertain to when the building was brought into compliance with the code if we take for example, go letting pull one of these up here - and look at the say the very first thing wood-frame building residential wood frame the date is january 1st, 1984, so if the building in question was permitted on or after that date or has been retrieved in compliance with the code on or after that date it triggers would not apply no no

we've taken that benchmark year list and we have combined it with the list of adoption years for the sfpucf benchmark years in the provision are just a little bit later than the benchmark years in the sfpuc 41 simply it took some time for san francisco 0 actually adopt the code that invoked the codes in the benchmark years other than that clarification and slight shift is it so essentially the benchmark in s c-41 we're proposing to replace that arbitrary dates with the dates that depends on the type of building caps. >> make sense. >> a list of dates now. >> so a table now. >> the structure is alternated and increased by 34 changes by a certain time limit to meet the standards. >> the dates pertain to when the building was brought into compliance with the code if we take for example, go letting pull one of these up here - and look at the say the very first thing wood-frame building residential wood frame the date is january 1st, 1984, so if the building in question was permitted on or after that date or has been retrieved in compliance with the code on or after that date it triggers would

impact the lafco and the pc i a and having lean energy present on a statewide prospective and have the sfpucto impacts us with that, i'll call of sue huh-uh h h sue is an do the presentation and the next presenter after that. >> convalescent committee members thank you. i am supposed to say sfgovtv goes to the power point so, yeah i'm susan the west coast with go solar a nonprofit advocacy organization that is working around the country to bring solar into the mainstream about the efforts to slow down the rooftop by attacking and policy called net meters we're in the middle of the debate the commission has not made a determination i could talk about this topic for many hours but keep it to 5 minutes as a context to start important to note we're reilly in the midst of a rooftop innovation in san francisco we serve 3 percent of big incurs demand the average price has dropped by more than half by 2009 and tripled the solar on the rooftop since 2011 and seeing 2/3rd's of the rooftop solar installation happening in lshgsz neighborhoods it is good news for the state but prompting a backlash that s

and other private companies and nonprofits a new program is our efforts to promote and insure the sfpucs around services and stewardship and lastly our winners with commission hopefully event yaesh as you may know the creation of a new puc is a priority for commissioner courtney want to thank his leadership in this development of this program and look forward to working with the commission and commissioner courtney in developing the details of the program in the fall. >> great, thank you it sounds like a wonderful new program i too want to thank county on his leadership would you like to say anything. >> if that's okay to the chair i too represent the workers and staff and carmen because going beyond puc staff is absolutely appropriate given the great work for the utilities by nonprofits and contractors and developers, etc. especially with the sources of the improvement coming up i'm enthusiastic about alu all of is participating in those events we do it in so many vrpts an antidote they're big boys and nothing phases them until you talk to them they like that insurance thing when it co

loaf people not only impacts us but impacting the pg&e program they're charged the p cia what the sfpuce care about chair mar our people good examples why we need changes i hope utilizing you'll vote yes own is resolution today, i heard about the comments things that are forward thinking i'm appreciative of those make sure we're not getting too far ahead but voting. >> yes. and brought up good ideas make sure we're not excluding people anyone if gets the go solar funds this be part of p cia to provide energy they'll be agreed to first on the wait list for the next customers that come in and once pg&e agrees they'll not opt out probable legislation or something that needs to be worked out with the city attorney's office and commissioner vice president moran i'm more than happy to sit down good ideas how we can do that if you go back to 2008 land use commission that is how long ago people were thinking about this tied together it is appropriate to have go solar customer hetch hetchy full power or treasure island or like me at hunters point and that maybe legislation needed i'll encourage

measure is expedited many thanks to commissioner mccarthy and thing thank to the fire department and the sfpuc who had the final merging the board ordered interagency task force on and on over the next month they'll finalize their recommendations and get back to the board with the fire and life safety in multi-unit buildings that are at risk for serious injuries and finally to the staff to have the blow quarter 3, 2015 please send in our nomination to william at sfgov.org as soon as possible to allow the recommendation committee to have the december meeting mr. secretary that concludes any announcements. >> any quo on the president announcements. >> the bic will take public comment within the jurisdiction not part of agenda. >> seeing none, on to item 4 discussion and possible action to approve a member of the code and 5150s for the engineer fee appointment recommended by the nomination subcommittee is bryan expiring august 2016. >> commissioner. commissioner lee or commissioner melgar. >> the nominations the committee met 10 days ago i suppose we drilled bryan sandra on his desire and willing