thank you. >> we heard from the sfpuc hearing they'll been losing be potentially 8 and a half million dollars in this the plaintiff cia increase goes through we've think thinking how to use this money back into the promissory note program we tell them the mask of the community choices going devotes this is is transfer of wealth and for money for build outs going instead to a maneuver in a conceptual way it is poor planning by this year corporation to be back stomped by the public not happening in any other industry i'll back up under brooks we need to look at the blunt of this but the funding of the p cia thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> dashing through the snow in a solar powder slay over the city hills we go green power all the way. >> bells are again to ring keeping spirits bright and bright i hope the item turn out right hope that goes well and hope it is swell and hope it sells oh, what fun to ride in a solar powder sleigh offering oh, no place like solar and green be able for the holidays and no matter how far away you room if you want to be economical

thank you. >> we heard from the sfpuc hearing they'll been losing be potentially 8 and a half million dollars in this the plaintiff cia increase goes through we've think thinking how to use this money back into the promissory note program we tell them the mask of the community choices going devotes this is is transfer of wealth and for money for build outs going instead to a maneuver in a conceptual way it is poor planning by this year corporation to be back stomped by the public not happening in any other industry i'll back up under brooks we need to look at the blunt of this but the funding of the p cia thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> dashing through the snow in a solar powder slay over the city hills we go green power all the way. >> bells are again to ring keeping spirits bright and bright i hope the item turn out right hope that goes well and hope it is swell and hope it sells oh, what fun to ride in a solar powder sleigh offering oh, no place like solar and green be able for the holidays and no matter how far away you room if you want to be economical

the sfpuc paid the transmission charge. in the past through pg&e through an agreement that expired on june 30, 2015. the estimated iso transmission charge is now approximately $20 million a year. these new charges require that the contract capacity increase by $100 million over the next five years to cover these additional costs. the sfpuc power enterprise budgeted for these increases. the total cost will had been paid to the iso through the apx pass r pass-through charge after it's occurred. they don't receive any fee from this. apx paid the iso transmission charges for july and august 2015 from the existing $5 million contract. since the apx will not have sufficient funding for the scheduling coordination and consulting support sfertses and activities and we support the budget analyst's recommendation to amend the resolution to provide retroactive authority to cover the payments to the california iso. this concludes my presentation and i am happy to answer any questions. >> thanks and this is on behalf of the supervisor t

. >>> before the offering document comes to you it will be critically reviewed by sfpuc officers and staff. so if they are the secures of disclosure. at initiation we would like to finance the facility and in that process we would like disclosure in bond counsel and in the disclosure offerings we will have disclosure counsel. we will provide all the necessary litigation expertise regarding disclosure counsel and bond counsel and offer all of our expertise on these documents. we will provide a third-party review on these statements and a testament of these documents and we will test these for consistency. as well we provide a comfort letter at the end of our process and this indicates that they have disclosed everything within the document. this gives us comfort that we can move forward with our finding. >>> bond counsel renders an opinion of validity on the bond. that we have complied with state law on the issuance of the bond. instead of a bondholder or an outside investor with these obligations we enforce their right to be repaid. finally our financial advisors will work with the p

. >>> before the offering document comes to you it will be critically reviewed by sfpuc officers and staff. so if they are the secures of disclosure. at initiation we would like to finance the facility and in that process we would like disclosure in bond counsel and in the disclosure offerings we will have disclosure counsel. we will provide all the necessary litigation expertise regarding disclosure counsel and bond counsel and offer all of our expertise on these documents. we will provide a third-party review on these statements and a testament of these documents and we will test these for consistency. as well we provide a comfort letter at the end of our process and this indicates that they have disclosed everything within the document. this gives us comfort that we can move forward with our finding. >>> bond counsel renders an opinion of validity on the bond. that we have complied with state law on the issuance of the bond. instead of a bondholder or an outside investor with these obligations we enforce their right to be repaid. finally our financial advisors will work with the p

this is applying to big programs like go solar and analyze the demand response intelligence that the sfpuc may be able to introduce into homes we give them light bulbs but to meter the technology in the day and hopefully, this is part of technology conversation because that actually delivers the bank for the buck like programs like go solar. >> any other public comment? hearing next item. >> >> good happy new years to the commissioners and first like to take a moment to let everyone know i harnt to visit dr. espanola jackson and when i actually went there she was in good spirits we talked about the college or 18 hundred oakdale she perked up i told her we need her involvement we're going though the planning process so i was who else was with me, sam murray she give us a lecture maybe too much for you today so we'll go next week to keep up her spirits i want to say we miss you coming to the commission so the first item i'd like 0 steve richie to give an update on the drought excuse me. steve richie assistant manager for water north side providing a drought update good news pro tem news the

. >> what is achievable and tida and usf needs to understand our concerns to that end sf sfpuc advisory committee submitted a letter of support to hold a special session i'm happy to say the groups that agree we met and the two agencies to discuss this scope of topics of interest and i'm glad that is finally done we're to center the open house on january 23rd at shipshape we'll have a history and information about the hetch hetchy power system historic outcomes not outcome but outage information and what is happening i want to thank bob and sfpuc for hosting this meeting and doing the heavily lifting. >> thank you to the advisory committee and the sfpuc staff that were appointed for their sport and the support of supervisor jane kim thank you. >> thank you mar taking the time to comment is there anyone else who wishes to speak on item number that would like to address the board. >> good afternoon. i'm sheri want to invite you to our annual black history month we'll setback the renaissance so having a live jazz band and costumes it is fun for the whole family an february 5th and if you c

. >> what is achievable and tida and usf needs to understand our concerns to that end sf sfpuc advisory committee submitted a letter of support to hold a special session i'm happy to say the groups that agree we met and the two agencies to discuss this scope of topics of interest and i'm glad that is finally done we're to center the open house on january 23rd at shipshape we'll have a history and information about the hetch hetchy power system historic outcomes not outcome but outage information and what is happening i want to thank bob and sfpuc for hosting this meeting and doing the heavily lifting. >> thank you to the advisory committee and the sfpuc staff that were appointed for their sport and the support of supervisor jane kim thank you. >> thank you mar taking the time to comment is there anyone else who wishes to speak on item number that would like to address the board. >> good afternoon. i'm sheri want to invite you to our annual black history month we'll setback the renaissance so having a live jazz band and costumes it is fun for the whole family an february 5th and if you c

. >>> before the offering document comes to you it will be critically reviewed by sfpuc officers and staff. so if they are the secures of disclosure. at initiation we would like to finance the facility and in that process we would like disclosure in bond counsel and in the disclosure offerings we will have disclosure counsel. we will provide all the necessary litigation expertise regarding disclosure counsel and bond counsel and offer all of our expertise on these documents. we will provide a third-party review on these statements and a testament of these documents and we will test these for consistency. as well we provide a comfort letter at the end of our process and this indicates that they have disclosed everything within the document. this gives us comfort that we can move forward with our finding. >>> bond counsel renders an opinion of validity on the bond. that we have complied with state law on the issuance of the bond. instead of a bondholder or an outside investor with these obligations we enforce their right to be repaid. finally our financial advisors will work with c sta

center i'm here to stress one thing that have are besides helping the contractors besides helping s sfpuc to show off the technology they have we need to pay attention to what really is happening in the community right now a heavy heart i'm come from the board of supervisors without making any comments over there to the commission over here so see god billing at what point you all arrived for me to make the comments i'm going to make it is useless to build a digesters now i know the general management and he knows me i know some commissioners like willie and a i know anderson because he's heard me this many years i don't want anything for myself i retired a long time ago we have reached the point in our community i'm begging the san francisco public utilities commission instead of catering to invested groups instead of wheeling and dealing and moving money with city build i get all the reports i have vertebrae good information that is reported to me i'm asking you you all somehow we have to address the thinking justice done to the segment of the population in the bayview known always the

for the states for those purposes instead of part of those funds if you were able to work with the sfpuc to get awe hold to push the puc you'll have more money to work would be aware of that for the future. >> thank you. >> other comments. >> executive director alice contractor i'm executive director of management corporation for 3 seven years and been the executive director for alamany farms for 3 seven years i want to tell you guys since 2008 no support with the department of environment don't get me wrong i love the department but had support and help you can say that annie we talk all the time and annie was here earlier and was glad annie came out and supported me with any youth and teaching classes and helped me out teaching class on wednesday with my youth so i came across $50,000 and with supervisor campos i said annie i need you and she came out and helped me out i was busy one person with one owe 68 unit so i needed annie's help so she's been a big support to me. >> thank you for all you do (clapping.) >> all right. other public comment on the budget seeing none, public comment

this is applying to big programs like go solar and analyze the demand response intelligence that the sfpuc may be able to introduce into homes we give them light bulbs but to meter the technology in the day and hopefully, this is part of technology conversation because that actually delivers the bank for the buck like programs like go solar. >> any other public comment? hearing next item. >> >> good happy new years to the commissioners and first like to take a moment to let everyone know i harnt to visit dr. espanola jackson and when i actually went there she was in good spirits we talked about the college or 18 hundred oakdale she perked up i told her we need her involvement we're going though the planning process so i was who else was with me, sam murray she give us a lecture maybe too much for you today so we'll go next week to keep up her spirits i want to say we miss you coming to the commission so the first item i'd like 0 steve richie to give an update on the drought excuse me. steve richie assistant manager for water north side providing a drought update good news pro tem news the

we've taken that benchmark year list and we have combined it with the list of adoption years for the sfpuc so the list of benchmark years in the provision are just a little bit later than the benchmark years in the sfpuc 41 simply it took some time for san francisco 0 actually adopt the code that invoked the codes in the benchmark years other than that clarification and slight shift is it so essentially the benchmark in s c-41 we're proposing to replace that arbitrary dates with the dates that depends on the type of building caps. >> make sense. >> a list of dates now. >> so a table now. >> the structure is alternated and increased by 34 changes by a certain time limit to meet the standards. >> the dates pertain to when the building was brought into compliance with the code if we take for example, go letting pull one of these up here - and look at the say the very first thing wood-frame building residential wood frame the date is january 1st, 1984, so if the building in question was permitted on or after that date or has been retrieved in compliance with the code on or after that date it t

for the states for those purposes instead of part of those funds if you were able to work with the sfpuc to get awe hold to push the puc you'll have more money to work would be aware of that for the future. >> thank you. >> other comments. >> executive director alice contractor i'm executive director of management corporation for 3 seven years and been the executive director for alamany farms for 3 seven years i want to tell you guys since 2008 no support with the department of environment don't get me wrong i love the department but had support and help you can say that annie we talk all the time and annie was here earlier and was glad annie came out and supported me with any youth and teaching classes and helped me out teaching class on wednesday with my youth so i came across $50,000 and with supervisor campos i said annie i need you and she came out and helped me out i was busy one person with one owe 68 unit so i needed annie's help so she's been a big support to me. >> thank you for all you do (clapping.) >> all right. other public comment on the budget seeing none, public comment

year the other legislation is just the logics of the location and the judiciousal transfer to the sfpuc that is automatically tricked after a series of actions so the legislation refers to fully executed memorandum of understanding memorandum of understanding and this was approved but is commission outlines the exception the rational the foundational and the logistics so the one dispatch is the with respect to, llc as the main developer and they're two partners in this venue the general manager and the architect f m a we've been doing since seeking out this essential balcony of talent to deliver this specialized project we had to find someone with the availability the marketplace to perform the skill sets we thought were necessary we also wanted to assure users or ourselves the pricing and others fees were at or better than the market conditions currently out there we did a review the bay area developers we believe are scombild this this kind of project contacted 6 of the top developers in the bay area we received 3 responsive very robust comments on the proposed fee structure and the c

loaf people not only impacts us but impacting the pg&e program they're charged the p cia what the sfpuce care about chair mar our people good examples why we need changes i hope utilizing you'll vote yes own is resolution today, i heard about the comments things that are forward thinking i'm appreciative of those make sure we're not getting too far ahead but voting. >> yes. and brought up good ideas make sure we're not excluding people anyone if gets the go solar funds this be part of p cia to provide energy they'll be agreed to first on the wait list for the next customers that come in and once pg&e agrees they'll not opt out probable legislation or something that needs to be worked out with the city attorney's office and commissioner vice president moran i'm more than happy to sit down good ideas how we can do that if you go back to 2008 land use commission that is how long ago people were thinking about this tied together it is appropriate to have go solar customer hetch hetchy full power or treasure island or like me at hunters point and that maybe legislation needed i'll encourage

. >> sir good afternoon, commissioners i'm scott an environmental manager and the sfpuc and dave meyers projector person and with the san francisco public utilities commission and half a been assist us with the design. >> can i get the screen please sfgov go to the computer so the a w sf is a pump station number two one of the pump stations in the city and one south of market that will pumpkin bay water into the system in a a w ss pumping system normally the system spilled by a reservoir on twin peaks but if it fails the two pump station can be used a fail-safe and it is provided to have the system that might be unavailable zalewski two pictures of hydrants those are the a w s f hydrants the smaller one is from over the water system and the a w ss system is designed could work after a seismic events where some systems might not two hydrants are in front of city hall right now as pointed out the pump station number two is on van ness at forts mason it was constructed in 1913 that was was it looked in 1920 this is interesting you can see the bay going you will 80 up to the mr. building be

and other private companies and nonprofits a new program is our efforts to promote and insure the sfpuc is around services and stewardship and lastly our winners with commission hopefully event yaesh as you may know the creation of a new puc is a priority for commissioner courtney want to thank his leadership in this development of this program and look forward to working with the commission and commissioner courtney in developing the details of the program in the fall. >> great, thank you it sounds like a wonderful new program i too want to thank county on his leadership would you like to say anything. >> if that's okay to the chair i too represent the workers and staff and carmen because going beyond puc staff is absolutely appropriate given the great work for the utilities by nonprofits and contractors and developers, etc. especially with the sources of the improvement coming up i'm enthusiastic about alu all of is participating in those events we do it in so many vrpts an antidote they're big boys and nothing phases them until you talk to them they like that insurance thing when it

we've taken that benchmark year list and we have combined it with the list of adoption years for the sfpuc so the list of benchmark years in the provision are just a little bit later than the benchmark years in the sfpuc 41 simply it took some time for san francisco 0 actually adopt the code that invoked the codes in the benchmark years other than that clarification and slight shift is it so essentially the benchmark in s c-41 we're proposing to replace that arbitrary dates with the dates that depends on the type of building caps. >> make sense. >> a list of dates now. >> so a table now. >> the structure is alternated and increased by 34 changes by a certain time limit to meet the standards. >> the dates pertain to when the building was brought into compliance with the code if we take for example, go letting pull one of these up here - and look at the say the very first thing wood-frame building residential wood frame the date is january 1st, 1984, so if the building in question was permitted on or after that date or has been retrieved in compliance with the code on or after that date it t

. >> sir good afternoon, commissioners i'm scott an environmental manager and the sfpuc and dave meyers projector person and with the san francisco public utilities commission and half a been assist us with the design. >> can i get the screen please sfgov go to the computer so the a w sf is a pump station number two one of the pump stations in the city and one south of market that will pumpkin bay water into the system in a a w ss pumping system normally the system spilled by a reservoir on twin peaks but if it fails the two pump station can be used a fail-safe and it is provided to have the system that might be unavailable zalewski two pictures of hydrants those are the a w s f hydrants the smaller one is from over the water system and the a w ss system is designed could work after a seismic events where some systems might not two hydrants are in front of city hall right now as pointed out the pump station number two is on van ness at forts mason it was constructed in 1913 that was was it looked in 1920 this is interesting you can see the bay going you will 80 up to the mr. building be

. >> a hi, i'm karen fry a project manager and sfpuc and the bureau of environmental management honestly i've not considered a public sector job i realized this was an opportunity to work on large capital projects from san francisco all the way to our hetch hetchy and the yosemite national park i work with engineers and city attorneys and scheduled and we all work tom nolan e together on the project. >> the excavations are in red we'll have the interference to go under the street. >> my next project is the largest project in the water system improvement program this is the southeast plan that involved a lot of kworpthsdz with the community groups and public when 9 commissioners such the planning commission and the board of supervisors or this ftc commission they help us in city hall this is a beautiful building it really is the inner workers of the building you feel you're in the heart of government and it's exciting to be part of that. >> we all know a major earthquake will eventually hit san francisco are reproerl presented san francisco is making sure we are with the public safety bui

. >> sir good afternoon, commissioners i'm scott an environmental manager and the sfpuc and dave meyersrojector person and with the san francisco public utilities commission and half a been assist us with the design. >> can i get the screen please sfgov go to the computer so the a w sf is a pump station number two one of the pump stations in the city and one south of market that will pumpkin bay water into the system in a a w ss pumping system normally the system spilled by a reservoir on twin peaks but if it fails the two pump station can be used a fail-safe and it is provided to have the system that might be unavailable zalewski two pictures of hydrants those are the a w s f hydrants the smaller one is from over the water system and the a w ss system is designed could work after a seismic events where some systems might not two hydrants are in front of city hall right now as pointed out the pump station number two is on van ness at forts mason it was constructed in 1913 that was was it looked in 1920 this is interesting you can see the bay going you will 80 up to the mr. building befo

year the other legislation is just the logics of the location and the judiciousal transfer to the sfpucf actions so the legislation refers to fully executed memorandum of understanding memorandum of understanding and this was approved but is commission outlines the exception the rational the foundational and the logistics so the one dispatch is the with respect to, llc as the main developer and they're two partners in this venue the general manager and the architect f m a we've been doing since seeking out this essential balcony of talent to deliver this specialized project we had to find someone with the availability the marketplace to perform the skill sets we thought were necessary we also wanted to assure users or ourselves the pricing and others fees were at or better than the market conditions currently out there we did a review the bay area developers we believe are scombild this this kind of project contacted 6 of the top developers in the bay area we received 3 responsive very robust comments on the proposed fee structure and the complexities of project things to watch out for

year the other legislation is just the logics of the location and the judiciousal transfer to the sfpuc that is automatically tricked after a series of actions so the legislation refers to fully executed memorandum of understanding memorandum of understanding and this was approved but is commission outlines the exception the rational the foundational and the logistics so the one dispatch is the with respect to, llc as the main developer and they're two partners in this venue the general manager and the architect f m a we've been doing since seeking out this essential balcony of talent to deliver this specialized project we had to find someone with the availability the marketplace to perform the skill sets we thought were necessary we also wanted to assure users or ourselves the pricing and others fees were at or better than the market conditions currently out there we did a review the bay area developers we believe are scombild this this kind of project contacted 6 of the top developers in the bay area we received 3 responsive very robust comments on the proposed fee structure and the c