the upcoming public integrity, sfpuc assessment. this is an audit performed part of their integrity series. they are meeting with various members of management. i would like to loosely call it similar to a management audit, looking at the organization structure. perhaps looking at different departments and functions and how they are related to one another, how they work with one another, reporting relationship. the scope there can potentially be limited to areas where they find concern or not or they may expand it based on anything they may observe in the course of their field work. at this time, it's an ongoing review. they hope to complete this some time q3 or q4 this year. >> president moran: thank you. commissioners, any questions or comments? seeing none, public comment please. >> clerk: members of the public who wish to make two minute public comment on item 9b, the quarterly audit and performance review report. dial (415)655-0001, meeting i.d. 2481 738 9289 pound pound. to raise your hand to speak press star 3. >> there is on

the upcoming public integrity, sfpuc assessment.rformed part of their integrity series. they are meeting with various members of management. i would like to loosely call it similar to a management audit, looking at the organization structure. perhaps looking at different departments and functions and how they are related to one another, how they work with one another, reporting relationship. the scope there can potentially be limited to areas where they find concern or not or they may expand it based on anything they may observe in the course of their field work. at this time, it's an ongoing review. they hope to complete this some time q3 or q4 this year. >> president moran: thank you. commissioners, any questions or comments? seeing none, public comment please. >> clerk: members of the public who wish to make two minute public comment on item 9b, the quarterly audit and performance review report. dial (415)655-0001, meeting i.d. 2481 738 9289 pound pound. to raise your hand to speak press star 3. >> there is one caller in the queu

impacted by the ronen sfpuc's work. over time what that meant sort of on the end of what it meant to be a community impact sort of aunt and float. soas we think of it today , we think of and i have someone mentioned labor to this to the attention of supervisor mar years ago. i don't know whether labor was excluded in the beginning whether it meant to be part of the community . it is certainly now as envisioned by the puc which is if someone said what i want to do is i want to sponsor an apprentice is going to join a union who really needs the wherewithal and support to get tothat program, that's the community benefit .that someone islikely to do . so at the core it is asking the people who we are paying money to do the work in our community to be a good neighbor. at the core of your question is how should we be doing this? i think supervisor mandelman had this at the core. should we be doing this and how shouldwe be doing it ? those are questions i think the puc answered as a positive yes, weshould be doing this . it's

our own analysis suggests 237,000-acre [inaudible] would shift over to the sfpuc. so, didn't get a response. we're still hopeful but perhaps there is that interest in having -- to express interest in having our questions answered and included in the webinar. we might get that very valuable information. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. next caller, your line is open. you have two minutes. >> caller: can you hear me ok? >> operator: loud and klaoefrment >> caller: good afternoon. david pillpal. just very briefly on general public comment. i hope my budget letter was received. i decided to memorialize the comments that i made on the various issues related to the budget at the last three meetings and provided that to the commission secretary. i hope that has been transmitted to you commissioners and staff. not sure if that's valuable, useful or anything. in any event, i hope the letter was received. i may have comments later on john roddy and the other other items under 8a and my careful scrutiny on items 6f and 9c, they both refer to the date as be

and sfpuc staff for the ltba. thank you. >> thank you for your comments. next caller. you have two minutes. >> caller: thank you. good afternoon president moran and commissioners. this is. -- last week we received san francisco's response to petition for reconsideration of the water quality certification that the state water board issued last year in the licensing process. san francisco response again claims that current water demand and the sfpuc service area is 238 million gallons a day. exhibit e in the same filing is sfpuc's water resource division annual report for fiscal year 2020-21. it shows the demand was 195 mtd. the figure cited in the petition to the state water board, inflated demand by 22%. this isn't a projection. we're talking about actual per demand. the figure was used to place figures in the san francisco chronical on may 28, 2021. i filed sunshine ordinance request for the data and calculations used to determine the rationing numbers. the response i received stated, we are withholding the information you're seeking as it constitutes attorney-client

which is the lights -- pg&e lights and not sfpuc lights have been out for the better part of the year. can you tell me when pg&e can get my lights back on? >> so we -- supervisor, i am familiar with that project. we have a very old type of lighting equipment that exists throughout the bay area. some cities own the same equipment. and it's street light technology. there are only a handful of individuals that handmake the replacement equipment for that. we are expediting in the next two years the replacement of all of that equipment on our system i put my foot down internally and it's time for it to go. and we need to take that out. and it's very hard to get parts for replacement of that. and so we are see wag it takes to energy a project and change out that technology. that will be a fairly disruptive technology on columbus that will require some major trenching. so we are working that in conjunction with the city right now with the intention of hopefully we can mutually cooperate and find out a way to do that is as little disruptive as possible and really get that fixed. because it's

so far, the sfpuc, and the agency has not done well. have a general manager. >> thank you for your comments. your time has expired. >> next caller, your line is open. you have three minutes to comment. >> coalition for san francisco neighbourhoods. speaking on my own behalf. i would urge the amendments to the 10 year capital plan. regarding the sunset reservoir which is south facing. it is technically a damn for south facing base into a retrofit design engineering. and change the fiscal year for the south facing design engineering from 2022-2023. add a line item for fiscal year 2023 for the south basin retrofit construction. add a line item for fiscal year 2022, 2023 for a feasibility study at the oceanside treatment facility. this was the san francisco site identified in a report. if the drop were severe, the national guard may need to be moved to the south facilities. the proposed facility in the county is infeasible in many respects. it is by far more feasible. finally, what is the backup facility? especially since harry tracy is nea

if there isn't any additional open remarks i will turn it over to sfpuc general manager for opening comments. >> thank you for calling this and thank you supervisors preston and peskin for allowing me to join you along with our assistant general manager for power who will speak later. thank you so much, supervisor. you summed it up and identified why it is we are here. unfortunately, we are here today about an ongoing problem. this body is too much where. continued obstruction here in refusing to connect to the electric grid unless unnecessary and wildly expensive equipment is added. these projects include styles home less abtheir's museum. in june 2018, 31 projects faced the roadblocks. since then 1200 pro jets. there are 68 active projects that need to be connected to the grid. you will hear from barbara heal. outside the rare agreement with several affordable housing the behavior has showed few signs of improving. they have delay the healthcare facilities now to muni shelters. one goal here. time me competition -- sometime styme competition. we are fighting to protect consumers. there was

which is the lights -- pg&e lights and not sfpuc lights have been out for the better part of the year. can you tell me when pg&e can get my lights back on? >> so we -- supervisor, i am familiar with that project. we have a very old type of lighting equipment that exists throughout the bay area. some cities own the same equipment. and it's street light technology. there are only a handful of individuals that handmake the replacement equipment for that. we are expediting in the next two years the replacement of all of that equipment on our system i put my foot down internally and it's time for it to go. and we need to take that out. and it's very hard to get parts for replacement of that. and so we are see wag it takes to energy a project and change out that technology. that will be a fairly disruptive technology on columbus that will require some major trenching. so we are working that in conjunction with the city right now with the intention of hopefully we can mutually cooperate and find out a way to do that is as little disruptive as possible and really get that fixed. because it's

which is the lights -- pg&e lights and not sfpuc lights have been out for the better part of the year. can you tell me when pg&e can get my lights back on? >> so we -- supervisor, i am familiar with that project. we have a very old type of lighting equipment that exists throughout the bay area. some cities own the same equipment. and it's street light technology. there are only a handful of individuals that handmake the replacement equipment for that. we are expediting in the next two years the replacement of all of that equipment on our system i put my foot down internally and it's time for it to go. and we need to take that out. and it's very hard to get parts for replacement of that. and so we are see wag it takes to energy a project and change out that technology. that will be a fairly disruptive technology on columbus that will require some major trenching. so we are working that in conjunction with the city right now with the intention of hopefully we can mutually cooperate and find out a way to do that is as little disruptive as possible and really get that fixed. because it's

the gentleman from sfpuc is throwing all that in the air.will we learn to be educated on issues? when will we learn to speak truth to power? when will we learn to represent the constituents of san francisco? thank you very much. >> clerk: thank you, mr. dacosta. thank you for being with us here today. may we have the next caller, please? >> good morning, commissioners. eric brooks for our city s.f. and clean power energy source. first of all, i want to say that lafco has a lot of power to take action when it wants to. want to talk about two things. one is a strong point of agreement with director hyams' presentation, and [indiscernible] from the larger choice c.c. power association. the first is a.b. 1814. the big monopoly energy corporations are allowed to get ahead of us by being first to get access to this money, so they'll make a profit off things like vehicle charging stations, when the community choice programs are far behind, so it's important that next month, lafco take this up and grow to support a.b. 1814. the point of difference i

which is the lights -- pg&e lights and not sfpuc lights have been out for the better part of the year. can you tell me when pg&e can get my lights back on? >> so we -- supervisor, i am familiar with that project. we have a very old type of lighting equipment that exists throughout the bay area. some cities own the same equipment. and it's street light technology. there are only a handful of individuals that handmake the replacement equipment for that. we are expediting in the next two years the replacement of all of that equipment on our system i put my foot down internally and it's time for it to go. and we need to take that out. and it's very hard to get parts for replacement of that. and so we are see wag it takes to energy a project and change out that technology. that will be a fairly disruptive technology on columbus that will require some major trenching. so we are working that in conjunction with the city right now with the intention of hopefully we can mutually cooperate and find out a way to do that is as little disruptive as possible and really get that fixed. because it's

. $150 million to dallas who worked for sfpuc. the first thing dallas did was $200,000 to. [indiscernable] this was before the political commission. they fined her. this came before the ethics commission. a slap on the hand. the ethics commission gave a slap on the hand to dallas. now here is the ethics commission trying to talk about public officials and that is not where the crux of the problem is. the crux of the problems is millions of dollars. 360 that millions of dollars. [indiscernable] why should the young community developers have the ability to have dwayne jones give them in money, and they give money back as consultant. so i say $200,000. they keep half of it and give half of it back. the ethics commission doesn't do anything. even now the ethics commission does not have the ability to monitor. they only have the ability to have meetings where they talk and talk and talk. they can't do nothing. the most important thing is enforcement. one of your commissioners said this corruption thing is going on too long. people are fed up. of course, we are fed up. i am fed u

if there isn't any additional open remarks i will turn it over to sfpuc general manager for opening comments. >> thank you for calling this and thank you supervisors preston and peskin for allowing me to join you along with our assistant general manager for power who will speak later. thank you so much, supervisor. you summed it up and identified why it is we are here. unfortunately, we are here today about an ongoing problem. this body is too much where. continued obstruction here in refusing to connect to the electric grid unless unnecessary and wildly expensive equipment is added. these projects include styles home less abtheir's museum. in june 2018, 31 projects faced the roadblocks. since then 1200 pro jets. there are 68 active projects that need to be connected to the grid. you will hear from barbara heal. outside the rare agreement with several affordable housing the behavior has showed few signs of improving. they have delay the healthcare facilities now to muni shelters. one goal here. time me competition -- sometime styme competition. we are fighting to protect consumers. there was

sfpuc commissioner tim paulson has stated from the dais that he saw his role on the commission as deferring to staff for the profession -- professionals. is this a closed-loop? thank you. [please standby for captioner switch] >> supervisor peskin: i will say that many of these charter amendments for including the police commission, the planning commission, for any number of commissions. next speaker, please. >> caller: good morning. i oppose this charter amendment on a number of grounds but largely because this significantly changes the balance of power in san francisco and significantly changes the structure of the way our city is run and i know on wednesday, there were a lot of arguments made by the proponents of the people who had called in saying that other cities do it this way, well, other cities are different. most of those cities that you called upon have five to seven supervisors. so if we want to cut down significantly, then that might make sense. our city is structured differently. if you want to talk about changing the structure of the city, at least be honest about it. but don'