may comment on ~ which option sfrpd is proposing to use for remediation. so, if they were to indicate that there is a preferable approach, that is what sfrpd must implement. so, there's a lot of context to this mitigation measure. it is not something where this is requiring a large obligation on the part of u.s. fish and wildlife. and as i say, it would not be expected that u.s. fish and wildlife would have allocated any resources to this effort at this time. that doesn't mean they can't review and comment. it just means they don't have anything in front of them to comment on so they haven't put any resource he towards doing that. >> and i completely under that we can't expect fish and wildlife services to allocate hours or resources or staffing to this project ~. there are certainly throughout the document statements that say simply we would submit it to them for review and comment and that's highlighted throughout the document. but, i mean, this one sentence says, sfrpd shall implement remediation measures as approved by u.s. fws and i can't read that an