. >> we have the same argument between professor gates, sgt crowley, and the president, but we know that it is bigger than that. after the beer is had, after they engage in polite conversation, and defer to each other in chester, that the real problem is still on the streets were disproportion month of black and latino men and women are subject to arbitrary forms a police power. if we have a real conversation about race, we have to be honest about it on all sides. it took the president of the united states of america and a professor of harvard pedigree just to argue against the word of a white policeman who was a sergeant in cambridge. what that says to me is that the every day, ordinary, average person subjected to these kinds of business forces may not actually be talked about. what we have to do is read but as the conversation between putting a personal face on a structural problem. it can do little more than change the deck chairs on the titanic. >> is a symbolic or is it structural? potentially. >> i think it is structural only because the goal is to move us back to a policy convers