our correspondent, shaimaa khalil in sydney told me what happened.scharged because it emerged that one member had actually been looking at an academic research paper about sexual assault that was not part of the evidence presented to court during the trial. the chiefjustice lucy mccallum said that while this may not have done any harm during the deliberations, this was not a risk she was willing to take. she also said that she estimated that she'd warned the jury members about 17 times if not more not to read external material, not to look at anything except the evidence presented to them. i remember being in the courtroom when she addressed thejury, saying much has been written about this case, much has been said about this case, do not to discuss this case outside the deliberation room, do not read any material that the media has published, but it seems now, it has emerged now one jury member has actually breached their oath and looked through other material. the actual paper, the academic paper, was found during a tidying up of thejury room, after