(pam)that was shannon behnken reporting. the way- 23 and me and ancestry are based here in the bay area. (grant) more than three hundred -million twitter passwords were exposed passwords million twitter passwords were exposed during what the company is calling a security breach. but as kron four's philippe djegal reports... users are being asked to change their passwords. (philippe) twitter says there is no evidence that the passwords of its 336 million users have been leaked or misused. but that for a period of time -- the passwords were insecure... connie guglielmo/cnet- "they stored all of those passwords. your password, my password, everyone who uses twitter, in a plain text file, instead of encrypting it. now, what does that mean? that means anybody internally at twitter could have seen your username and you password. not good when it's plain text." twitter says it discovered a bug that prevented the passwords from being encrypted. connie guglielmo (goo-yell-mo) is the editor-in-chief of cnet news in san francisco.conni

(vikci) reporter shannon behnken has an in-depth look ....re the risks of sending in your d-n-a sample... while others still believe when they get the answers they are looking for.. it is worth it,. a simple swab could be key to discovering where you cam from and potential health issues. thats why sales are souring for dna home testing kits. but to get those answers you could end up signing over some rights. just check out this content form for ancestry.com. 2,905 pages, 98 paragraphs, reading time 10 minutes and 34 seconds.- did you read all that?-no-you didn't read the fine print?- no, i don't read fine prints. i suffer the consequences later.for carol mason who was adopted at birth, the privacy risk was worth it. for ancestry found her birth fathers family in just months. carol mason : i'm very happy that i found a first cousin, it just gives you a feeling of completeness. like you know what your heritage is. millions of americans dna samples stored at labs for companies like ancestry and 23andme. that information is aggregated, your name

shannon behnken has a closer look .sting kits. but to get those answers you could end up signing over some rights. just check out this content form for ancestry.com. 2,905 pages, 98 paragraphs, reading time 10 minutes and 34 seconds.- did you read all that?-no-you didn't read the fine print?- no, i don't read fine prints. i suffer the consequences later.for carol mason who was adopted at birth, the privacy risk was worth it. for ancestry found her birth fathers family in just months. carol mason : i'm very happy that i found a first cousin, it just gives you a feeling of completeness. like you know what your heritage is. millions of americans dna samples stored at labs for companies like ancestry and 23andme. that information is aggregated, your name removed and then its turned into data bases. why? money. what types of companies want to buy my dna information? - that insurances, medical testing companies.and here's why that should concern you. - - marc rotenberg, electronic privacy information center that information c