no one can be blamed for doing what is obligatory in the shari'ah, the good and the forbidding of the must be done with kindness and tolerance, the consequences are opposite , give and take and riot, what they are doing, they both get fined, why should we eliminate it, but some believe that the authority the one who is enjoining the good and forbidding the evil must be so don't be aggressive and disagree with your opinion on article 64 in such a way that after that there was no discussion in the commission, we had no doubts, what happened that it has become like this, they are a layer for you, the question is another point. they tell me that attention should be aggressive, no one says such a thing, but now in the process of this matter of good and forbidding in the society , we can see that with the very first conversation and with each other, the softness and tolerance he has there is a discussion about whether the administration is going to publicize or forbid what is to be denied i will tell you, but the other side is so aggressive, we have a trick for someone who wants to be famou

covering and hijab is for all people and no one can be blamed doing what is obligatory according to shari'ahnjoining good and forbidding evil must be done with kindness and tolerance. they believe that the person who is enjoining the good and forbidding the evil must be so strong that he can not be aggressive, and contrary to your opinion, article 64 is here as it is. the income for you is a layer, they themselves ask another point , no one will ever get it, including my mr. khorramabadi pay attention, they say that it should be nice to enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil, who does not say such a thing in the process of what is done and forbid what is evil? the one who is having an argument on this side of the administration makes the matter famous or prohibits the negative immediately in most cases, now i won't say all, but the other side becomes so aggressive, we make it famous for this matter, come and see this, that is, in different places. messages are coming from different cities, clips are coming out, reminding both sides of gentleness and tolerance it leads to insulting the h

guardian council, we said that you violated this demand of the supreme leader, both western and shari'ah , and studied the legal rights of the supreme leader, so that the officials involved in the violation would increase with the participation of the officials. hazrat agha's demand, what is the program, the program will be announced i have done broadcasting and planning, i have started the project , and i hope they don't suffer anymore, and this should be continued, it should be continued , and it should not be forgotten that different political currents should express their views, even to the functioning of the existing parliament and the functioning of the government. there should be criticism even of the performance of radio and television, they can easily express themselves and speak their own words, and of course you can bring groups of others, that currents can flow in the society. hazrat agha was once able to deal with economic issues, and they said that this theme is finally against us military war every war the economy of every media war is from this. i have started against the