no, do not tell sharon stone not to slap me. she is not going to do it again.o me, and she whales on me again. and they get another incredibly real reaction because i just got slapped a second time. she comes back in, i'm so sorry, it just felt right for the take. and now everyone is not loking at me. they're unsure. do they talk about this? so i walk outside. literally like groundhog day. i walk outside again, and i'm holding my face, and the team comes out again. we got it. we should say something. sharon stone isn't going to slap me a third time there's no way. like we got it. it is wasn't even on me. the camera was not my close-up. she would never. we do the take again. she gets right in there, and i'm literally looking at her like, and i'm kind of going like this. and i'm like just get in there, kaley. she is not going to slap you again. it's okay. it's okay. she slaps me again. three times i got slapped. wasn't even me in the third take. so now i need to ice. and i'm like. >> jimmy: really? >> and i walk out. hey, it was on my -- i understand, i understan

the heroines of sharon stone from the basic instinct, that is, the deputy leader of the borisov partyht in parliament and quote erotically crossed and then their legs thank you for not being a man. in general, look. what do they do when there is a war in ukraine. angeli raynor has never had a hard time arguing with boris johnson in the house of commons and the conservatives suggested that rayner liked to distract the prime minister by using the parliamentary equivalent of sharon stone's infamous scene in the 1992 film instinct with me, raynor's 41-year-old socialist grandmother, who dropped out of school at 16 due to pregnancy and had no qualifications before becoming a carer often struck at the prime minister during sharp, and some say flirtatious exchanges . in his first interview after the scandal. she says it's zhenya hateful attitude shocked her responsibility is disgusting. this is a complete lie. i was trying to prepare my children for what they will see on the net, which their mother portrays in this way. i was very depressed by this johnson threatens to retaliate against the

like sharon stone in basic instinct. —— rayner.ms to be after another. on top of the party— to be after another. on top of the party gate — to be after another. on top of the party gate allegations that we've been _ party gate allegations that we've been hearing, they can't try and draw a — been hearing, they can't try and draw a line _ been hearing, they can't try and draw a line under this. as we going to iocet— draw a line under this. as we going to local elections on may the 5th where _ to local elections on may the 5th where the — to local elections on may the 5th where the tory party is going to go back to _ where the tory party is going to go back to being the sleazy party. we talk about — back to being the sleazy party. we talk about sleaze that was a word that was — talk about sleaze that was a word that was used at expenses fiddling and cash _ that was used at expenses fiddling and cash for questions, etc, but this really— and cash for questions, etc, but this really is sleazy. watching pornography sitting next to or in f

sharon stone joins as her another.e talked about being blown away she is hanging out with sharon stone, the first two episodes have dropped on hbo max and they will do a week-by-week rollout from here on. >> she was great, by the way. >> it's a new moment. >> absolutely. >> the cia stuff, the cia is kind of boring. >> yeah. the secret from washington. >> exactly. >> and if we could learn anything from sharon stone, shoot your shot if you want an opportunity. >> that's right. >> it's kinda sad. at the end of the era for "black-ish." the finale aired this week. the legacy live on. >> it's been a staple in primetime for is so many years. anthony anderson talked about how great the show experience is, how proud he is to take on serious social issues. they got the right tone, done it in a funny way that has universal appeal, welcoming people into the conversation. he understands this is how it goes. gave us tracee ellis-ross, the most magnificent joyful, right. it's launched careers of others. so the legacy continues in gro

legs, which they compared in a frankly as she described it as a perverted smear, comparing her to sharon stonee has been a huge backlash about this and angela rayner came out and condemned as sort of a wildlife and borisjohnson tweeted earlier that he did not in disagreed with angela rayner on many things in politics but he thought it was appalling and it did not come from him, condemned to outright. so, it's a very interesting thing because it also in the story they make reference to the original story and the fact that compare angela rayner and borisjohnson's backgrounds anonymously borisjohnson is well known to have been educated at eton couege known to have been educated at eton college went to oxford university and they draw on the comparison between his experience in learning and debating in the oxford union and her background where she left school at 16 and was a single teenage mother and worked as a carer. so there is a lot of christmas will about the kind of snobbery and class criticism in that particular really because angela rayner is well regarded as a very strong debater. so it's

we repeated a very cool image today for the red carpet vat, but sharon stone already had this image inhe ninety-eighth year, but she put on her boyfriend's shirt and tucked it into a vat skirt, what did she do? she, as it were, pulled up the trend, which is now relevant for an open tummy, an ideal press, of course, in this case will not be superfluous. but if it is not there, then you just need to pull the skirt higher if you want to hide the flaws of the figure, if you replace the sequined skirt with jeans with holes or bright trousers, the image will immediately become more versatile. this one is two. this one, in general, is already giving up, even the most ardent adherents of oversize at sweet home. a collection of shirts, but there is no shortened one yet. yes, i love the masculine cut, so that everything is closed. not so just get out of your comfort zone. i mostly wear long ones. yes, and it is also desirable to hide the stomach hides. everything, everything, or just hide the stomach, everything is fine. let's try to hide everything, but make the image as relevant as possible, e

distract the pm at the dispatch box by deploying a fully clothed parliamentary equivvalent of sharon stone's mp said, �*she knows she can't complete with boris�* oxford union debating training, but she has other skills which he lacks. she has admitted as much when enjoying drinks with us on the commons terrace.”' obviously, angela rayner says that is completely untrue. what do you think about a tory mp apparently saying that and the fact it is written up in a sunday newspaper by their political editor? i think it is completely unacceptable for a conservative mp, any mp, to make such comments. i'm glad to hear the likes of chris philp, the tech minister, doing the morning broadcast round this morning saying it is not only unacceptable, but if he heard a colleague making such a suggestion, he would obviously call it out. i think that is what we need to hear from mps, particularly male mps — that commitment to stamp out such talk, even if it's made injest in the tearoom, in the bars late at night in parliament. i think when it comes to the reporting of such claims, it is always a difficult deci

guys, if sharon stone wants to do the show, you say yes. just move on.other and daughter like at the mall. yeah, like the mall photos you take, but i hadn't met her. i hope she thinks it's funny. i think it's funny. >> not creepy at all. not creepy at all. very creepy. >> zosia mamet, who plays your best friend in season 2, you two have become really close off screen. so close, in fact, that you both got your second matching tattoo. >> we did. >> this one says what, boop? >> b-o-o-p. when we met -- i had to spell it. it's in bold. when i met zosia, she came in to test for the show and we did a chemistry read a couple of years ago, and we were kind of playing and improving together and went boop on her nose and she swatted my hand away and she's like, what are you doing and we kept doing this thing so when she left, oh, my god, you guys are obviously best friends. so cute. we've never met. so we -- from here on out, we kept booping each other. she's actually booping my phone and so we got it on our arms because we're insane and so we put boop on there. we

this is to do with their row over that article comparing angela rayner to sharon stone and basic incidentas no right to interfere in terms of freedom of speech. what do you think? i know you don't work for the mail on sunday but were you embarrassed by the article, do you think that it's right that the editor and political editor are being summoned to parliament or not? the editor are being summoned to parliament or not?— editor are being summoned to parliament or not? the mail on sunday is _ parliament or not? the mail on sunday is our— parliament or not? the mail on sunday is our sister _ parliament or not? the mail on sunday is our sister paper. - parliament or not? the mail on sunday is our sister paper. i . parliament or not? the mail on i sunday is our sister paper. i think it's actually— sunday is our sister paper. i think it's actually quite extraordinary how the — it's actually quite extraordinary how the comments have almost interned — how the comments have almost interned the entire story on him and his comments. in many ways united people _ his comments. in many ways united pe

old recording of a podcast where angela rayner was talking about the comparison between her and sharon stone could find that amusing but if it was being used as amusing but if it was being used as a ploy, it would be annoying. there was a real brainstorm in things yesterday that government departments could do around regulations which means that they could cost people less money to comply with them. a few ideas have emerged, just ideas at this stage, for example, changing the rules around childcare for the number of adults that have to be there for the number of children so you could have more children and fewer adults in the childcare could cost less? instead of having an mot for your car every year, could you help people save 55 quid and have it every two years? there is also an argument in the cabinet or a discussion in the cabinet, long—running, about cutting import taxes on food from abroad, which could potentially make food a bit cheaper? there are pros and cons for each idea, that they are not government policy yet. the danger for the government in this situation is, does this look li

to bat their reasons are because they say angela rayner herself brought this comparison up with sharon stonenct on a podcast earlier this year and three other unnamed conservative mps have come forward to corroborate the original story. what did you think when you first heard the speaker had summoned the editor of the mail on sunday to a meeting? i summoned the editor of the mail on sunday to a meeting?— summoned the editor of the mail on sunday to a meeting? i thought, wow, i've not heard — sunday to a meeting? i thought, wow, i've not heard that _ sunday to a meeting? i thought, wow, i've not heard that before. _ sunday to a meeting? i thought, wow, i've not heard that before. also - sunday to a meeting? i thought, wow, i've not heard that before. also the . i've not heard that before. also the question about whether he could revoke the political editor's lobby, that would be quite a big step, obviously, it would make people concerned. there have been a request to revoke the pass of another journalist at the times last week, a lot of this is going on so i understand why a lot ofjournalists

angela rayner of what it called a "basic instinct ploy" — a reference to the character played by sharon stone — angela rayner "knows she cant compete with boris" oxford union debating training, but she has other skills which he lacks". the speaker of the house of commons also criticised the article — and says he's asked the mail on sunday's editor to meet him. i express my sympathy to the right honourable member for being subject of this type of comment in being demeaning, offensive to women in parliament and can only deter women who might be considering standing for election to the detriment of us all. that is why i am arranging a meeting with the chairman of the press lobby, the editor of the mail on sunday to discuss the issue. female politicians say sexist and mysoginist behaviourfrom male colleagues at westminster is all too common. rachel reeves is labour's shadow chancellor. what really depresses me is the culture inside parliament, and more than 100 years after the first woman took her seat in the house of commons, that that sort of stuff is still going on and there are still far too

minister's questions with her legs, comparing her to "a fully—clothed parliamentary equivalent of sharon stoner investigation for sexual misconduct. and that includes three of his cabinet ministers. the prime minister has just rightly said that there can be no place for sexism and misogyny in this house. so can he now confirmed whether he considers that sexual harassment, apparently unlike bullying and lying is grounds for dismissal under the ministerial code? thank you, mr speaker. of course sexual harassment is intolerable and is quite right that members should now— have a procedure by which they can bring that to the attention of the house authorities. and i think that's a good thing and of course it's grounds for dismissal. i should think so. but that was any other place of work and someone was caught looking at pornography in the workplace that would be an instant second offence, what nick was back yet, it would. fit second offence, what nick was back yet. it would-— yet, it would. of course the house of commons _ yet, it would. of course the house of commons frequently _ yet, it would. of

tory mps have suggested she tries to distract the pm at the dispatch box by disclosing a copy of sharon stone a tory mp apparently saying that and the fact it is written up in a sunday newspaper by their political editor? i sunday newspaper by their political editor? ~ , _, , , editor? i think it is completely unacceptable _ editor? i think it is completely unacceptable for _ editor? i think it is completely unacceptable for a _ editor? i think it is completely. unacceptable for a conservative editor? i think it is completely i unacceptable for a conservative mp, any mp, to make such comments. i'm glad to hear the likes of chris phillips, the tech minister, during the morning rounds saying it is not only unacceptable but if he heard a colleague making such a suggestion he would honestly call it out. i think that is what we need to hear from mps, particularly male mps, that commitment to stamp out such talk, even if it's made injest in the tearoom, in the bars late at night in parliament. i think when it comes to the reporting on such claims, it is always a difficult decision, a judgment call