shawn kane and adam leavitt with grant and ice isenhoffer representing the victims of g.m.ars and ray lahood, secretary of transportation from 2009 to 2013. there were back and forth internal documents that have not been released to the opinion that shows how much it would cost to fix these switches, and how much it would save in warranty costs. when they found that it would cost $0.90 per unit and only save them $0.10 to $0.15 per unit, the decision was to stop making the fix. are these calculations often made in situations like these? >> what happens is that the defect decision the cost benefit analysis are juggled, and they're played out in the political sphere. what we see it's not just happening there, but their calculation of risk comes into play how the government enforcement role comes into play. we can take for example the things like the toyota unintended acceleration problem where three-quarters of the vehicles were never fixed by any recall whatsoever, and the only solution was floor mats for sticky pedals. the same kinds of things we're starting to see with oth