>> supervisor sheehy: to $2 million? >> supervisor cohen: for example, if we gave every district $2 million for you to allocate on your own -- >> supervisor sheehy: that would be great. i would support that. >> supervisor cohen: the point i'm making is that it shrinks the citywide budget. so you have the opportunity to use your own process and that would -- what we do for one district, we have to be consistent for every district. so $2 million -- and just for clarification. it would be $2 million over two years. >> supervisor sheehy: right. >> supervisor cohen: this year, we're asking for people to make budget allocations for $2 million. kelly kirkpatrick, if you could verify that. that's $1 million over -- $1 million for one year, correct, for last year's process? she's looking it up. she will get back to us. let's pivot to your other -- >> supervisor sheehy: sure. again, i would say that we can have that conversation one of the arguments that i was looking at is that sometimes at least the way it's been in terms of the

supervisor sheehy? >> we anticipate all the cost for the office of cannabis being recooped in fees. >> that is the model for the on going, yes. >> so first year we have to pay but after that we set this up specifically so all these costs, including this salary would be captured in fees from people in the industry? >> yes. >> and so we have somebody in this job right now? >> yes. >> so if we cut their salary by 44% what is the likely out come? >> that's a personal decision of the person that is in the position. ken can't purport to know what the person is going to do or how they are going to respond? >> now, my understanding is that this person has been a high performerer -- performer at least from people in the cannabis industry. for me this cost will be recooped in the long run via fees that we have an incumbent performing greatly. i understand my colleague's frustration and displeasure at the switch but we are in a situation where we have somebody whose cost are going to be recooped from industry who

supervisor sheehy? >> supervisor sheehy: i wouldn't agree with that. if we can start getting employees out of cars, and using mass transit, but eight miles a day, seriously? >> supervisor cohen: hold on. the reason why it's eight miles a day is it's an old car and it's breaking down. >> and the reason -- >> supervisor cohen: director, director, i'm sorry. i want supervisor sheehy to finish his thought. >> supervisor sheehy: i just thought it would be great if the b.l.a. could look at car usage overall and look at the size of our fleet. who knows. maybe they'll put everybody on scooters. but honestly, the cars, that's -- now, it's just -- there are a lot of city cars. >> supervisor cohen: maybe we do need city scooters. >> supervisor sheehy: we do need -- i mean, we put so many encumbrances on people being able to drive in this city with the goal of everybody using transit, but we do not follow that practice in my experience as a city. so if we can eliminate one car, i think we'll make progress. >> if i

cobb cone supervisor sheehy, i'm -- >> supervisor cohen: supervisor sheehy, can you repeat that question? i'm sorry. >> supervisor sheehy: we've been talking about classes, but what we're actually talking about is positions, so 50 positions in this year's budget and 50 positions in next year's budget. so there's some discussion about keeping 50 positions in next year's budget. so that was the clarification that i wanted to kind of make sure that we're talking about, keeping 50 positions in this year's budget, and then for the following year, you know, we're debating whether to put them on reserve or to go ahead and fund them. we're describing it as a class, but what we really mean are 50 positions. just a point of clarification, that's all. >> supervisor cohen: right, and i think that kind of enhances and supports what i was saying. if that is the case, then, we can substitute it out and deduce it on the two-year budget, but what's important is we're not in a position of trying to backfill for an additional class. i think there needs to be more information when it comes to an analysis, w

supervisor sheehy wants to speak and then supervisor yee. >> supervisor sheehy: i have a fundamental problem with this because i don't see behavioral health belongs in the justice system. that's your role. muddying that water -- if there's lack of capacity, we'll talk to department of health. it's a health issue, not criminal justice issue. it's a civil matter, not criminal matter. so if it needs legal assistance, we just talked about doing conservativeships in the city attorney's office. i'm reluctant to put the criminal justice on behavioral health issues and that's what we'll be doing. i admire your humanity and the way you do your work, but you will not be there forever. the stigmata of criminal justice on behavioral health is something that bedevils society and the city. i think there should be a bright line. if there's capacity that needs to be developed, if it is starting down the process of civil conservativeships, if it's healthcare-related, which is what i personally believe, it needs to be in the department of public health. >> if i could just respond -- perhaps i was not

supervisor sheehy. >> supervisor sheehy: just clarity. so you want to allow the 1.9 or 1.7 nurse practitioners to stay in d.p.h.'s budget and move over the manager and i think there were two prom mattic positions -- two programmatic services but still get the augmented services. >> absolutely. d.p.h. needs an additional nurse to do the unit, and that is totally appropriate. i am only asking for the 2593 position and the 1824 position. those two positions to move over. and then asking this budget committee to add a third position to h.r.c. >> supervisor cohen: 2593 and? >> supervisor: 1824. >> supervisor cohen: all right. 1824. and in your third request is for -- >> supervisor: is for a director of the program in h.r.c. >> supervisor cohen: okay. i, as you know, have been caught up in the budget. i would love to get a little bit more information. i have worked for the city a long time and i was unaware there was such a crisis that you are describing. so i would love to know a little bit more if that is where that source of information come

supervisor sheehy, i think you had comments about the amendments? >> yes, deputy city attorney john gibner again. following the committee meeting, we've prepared additional amendments at the committee's direction. i think the document that was just circulated that you read from, supervisor sheehy, is the older version. that was considered in committee. but following on, on your suggestions and supervisor kim's suggestions, we have a different version. i don't think the hard copy is here. i'm happy to read that language in. also on pages 6 and 8, as you said. the sunset language. the general plan consistency language is the same in both documents. but the sunset would read, "unless reenacted, in note shall expire 72 months after the effective date of the ordinance in this board file. upon its expiration, any approved public parking lot shall be removed. and the current zoning control shall apply. any approval of a public parking lot used pursuant to this note shall be conditioned upon the recordation of a notice of special ee strikzs reflecting these

supervisor sheehy? >> supervisor sheehy: aye. >> clerk: sheehy, aye. supervisor fewer? >> supervisor fewer: no. >> clerk: fewer, no. supervisor cohen? >> supervisor cohen: aye. >> clerk: cohen, aye. the motion passes. >> supervisor cohen: all right. chief, you're done. thank you for your time. i'd like to call up kelly kirkpatrick to discuss technical amendments. >> thank you for your patience. i had to get all the papers together. the clerk should be bringing them over to you. i have included three rounds of technical adjustments. round one is what you had heard on monday? all the technical cleanups about balancing overhead entries, correcting work orders, accurately reflecting grant amounts, and it includes the detail which i submitted to you all via e-mail over monday, but i wanted you to have that full package to accept. round two of which there's a letter as well as excel sheet is attached are actualizing the rebalancing plans for homeless and mohcd, so it was removing all items related to proposition d that was included in the first budget, removing the state reve

supervisor sheehy. >> supervisor sheehy: when i was in the d.a. office, misdemeanor attorneys would not have 500 cases. 500 cases is a lot of cases. that is unusually high degree of cases. my question for the city attorney is, litigation, how many cases someone litigate simultaneously -- i know it varies. you can have very complex. when your fighting sanctuary city you have a team of attorneys. how many cases could an attorney over the course of the year litigate? >> i would say this, the nature of a criminal practice is very different than civil practice. there was no one in my office not one person that has a case load of 500 cases, 250 cases or 100 cases. not one. civil cases are different. for me, i know in the criminal realm it's different. i would say in our office, i don't know any of our civil lawyers that has a case load of more than say at the most would be 30 or 40. >> supervisor sheehy: we had the director of public health here, couple of months ago describing a situation where single individual have been 51, 50 over hundred times befo

vice chair sandy fewer and catherine stefani and supervisor sheehy. thank you very much. >> supervisor a. peskin: president cohen. >> president m. cohen: i will go last, i will let my colleagues go and go after them. >> supervisor a. peskin: supervisor safai? >> supervisor a. safai: thank you, chair peskin, president cohen. i just want to acknowledge the work that went into the budget process, a stark contrast between year-1 and year-2. i think there were significant improvements made to the overall progress. i really appreciate the time and be able to have conversations about priorities citywide in the add-back process, both in this chamber and listening to the community and synthesizing that information. i wanted to highlight a few things in particular we are proud about, expanding the ability for young students in the high school age group 14-18 to have access to coding and math and additional pathways into accessing the technological revolution, really happy about the opportunity to fund that. we had a significant amount of conversation around fil

. >> supervisor cohen: supervisor sheehy? >> supervisor sheehy: yes. well, i'd like to support -- >> supervisor cohen: i was going to say, turn your mic on. we can't hear you, but it's on now. >> supervisor sheehy: okay. thank you. you know, in my district since i've been on the board, i feel like that we've been, in many parts of the district, in an almost crisis situation. just talking about sector cars, we looked at the mission, well, 43% of their time is spent responding to calls, which is above the national average and t at a level that is too high for them to effectively do their work. eight calls would be an actual crime in process where someone physically threatened just moments after that, and then, you have someone who's a victim of a crime who's waiting for an officer to respond after the situation has stopped. so somebody's been mugged, the person's run off. they wait there, you know, hours. i talked to officers who could not get to those calls over an entire shift, over an entire shift. and so then when i hear from constituents that their

sheehy aye. stefani aye. tang aye. there are 11 ayes. >> president breed: the ordinance has finally passed unanimously. madam clerk please call items 2-5 together. >> clerk: items 2-5 comprise proposed interim budget appropriating all estimated receipts and expenditures. item three proposed interim annual salary ordinance. item 4 treasure island development authority interim budget and item 5 office of community investment and infrastructure. >> president breed: can we take these items same house, same call? without objection, those items are approved unanimously. madam clerk, item 6. >> clerk: motion to enact a 3% cost of living adjustment to the base contract for the budget and legislative analyst services for approximate $67,000 increase resulting in a new fiscal year '18-'19 of approximately $2.29 million. >> president breed: same house, same call? without objection the motion is approved unanimously. madam clerk, please call items 7-19 together. >> clerk: comprise 13 ordinances that adopt m.o.u.'s between the city

>> supervisor sheehy: well, i was just going to make a point. we know that there's 5.3 million in additional revenue that the controller has identified, plus a 1.5 million that we identified in savings from this morning, so that's 6.8. so i guess for me, still, i like the list in front of us. i think it should be funded. i -- if we are going to put forward things that we want to be funded, i would take everything everybody mentioned plus a district wide ask and take it to them, rather than trying to make choices now amongst the various things we've identified to make sure we've got money -- 'cause we can have that debate, but what number are we trying to get to? >> supervisor cohen: sure. the controller will standup and let us know. >> i don't know that i can do the math that quickly. obviously, the value of the different items that were discussed here over the last couple of hours are dramatically in excess of the 6.8 million, so i think part of the exercise is among the different priorities that have been talked about here, in a world where fu

sheehy present. commissioner steph ani present. commissioner tang present. ye absent we have quorum. >> good morning colleagues, so with your support and the support of the voters we were able to pass regional member three with two-thirds of the san francisco voters passing bridge tools thatolls and passed with l benefit the city and entire region. this will benefit safe rail improvements, studies for a second transbay rail tube. we need these regional funds to match what federal dollars are out there along with state and local dollar for state and local improvements. not everyone agrees with investing infrastructure as we have seen in the effort to repeal sb1 the gas tax passed last year and the recall of that has qualified for the november ballot. it was a 12-cent per gallon increase that generates $5 million annually statewide and $6 million per year for road funds through san francisco. [reading] i think you all know that we won one of those recently and we have seen sb awards go to bart, caltran, transbay buses. on ja knee va avenue and -- [indiscernibl

yes, supervisor sheehy? >> supervisor sheehy: i had a question. so accept full staffing in year one and put funding for staffing in year two on hold? >> supervisor cohen: that's correct. mr. rosenfeld? >> we're reserving the value of the january class in year two, as i understand, so we'll calculate the cost of that and place that amount in reserve. >> supervisor cohen: yes. i'm sorry, was there a second on that motion? okay. well, then, the motion fails. [ gavel ]. >> supervisor cohen: someone else make the motion. >> supervisor fewer: no, i was just going to say that i think supervisor yee was going to propose a motion. >> supervisor yee: yeah, i think it was my original thought, and i'll -- i guess my compromise would be that i'll -- i won't disturb the first year's class, and to actually put -- reduce the amount for the budget on the second year to the cost of the academy class cost, and, again, i want to reity -- reiterate that after the study there shows that hardly anyone can be civilianized, i would go in the next year to support to put it

i saw a second from supervisor jeff sheehy. may we take this without objection? all right. we will take this without objection. [ gavel ]. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. what's next? okay. we've got -- i want to call up h.s.a. h.s.a., we'll hear your b.l.a. report. >> chair cohen, members of the committee, for the human services agency, the budget and legislative analyst's recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 1,701,295. of that -- sorry. okay. of the 1,701,295 in 18-19, 1,601,295 are ongoing savings and 100,000 are one time saves. these reductions would still allow an increase of 5.8% in the department's 18-19 budget. budget and legislative analy . >> supervisor cohen: thank you. trent, i want to give you an opportunity. >> good morning, again, commit members. trent rohrer, human services agency. we are in agreement, however, we do have the one item, the dignity fund being on reserve, which director mcspadden spoke about earlier. we're in agreement with the completed monetary items, but we're not in agreement with the items being put on reserve. >> superviso

i want to recognize my committee, vise president -- or vice chair sandy fewer, jeff sheehy on my right, kathrin stefani and norman yee on my left. we've got a pretty long day today and tomorrow scheduled. we're going to be hearing thoughtful rebuttals, i hope. i'm sure some of you will come up with some not so thoughtful rebuttals, but that's okay. all right. so i just want to welcome everyone to day four of department presentations. yea, we've made it. the first three days have been eventful. today we're hearing the recommended changed made by their budget legislative analysts. those departments who've reached out in agreement with the b.l.a., and for whom we have no questions, we're going to reach out to you first, and then you will be dismissed. departments who do not agree with the b.l.a. or whose reports include policy recommendition as, you can present your case. this committee will try to make as many decisions as possible today. for the media, we will make decisions monday morning. we also have some procedural legislation that we need to take care of today. as in the past, we w

supervisor sheehy was concerned about losing a parking lot. they voted to limit the proposed parking lot to six years, require a notice of special restriction to be placed on the property, noting that limitation and voted to forward it to the full board with a positive recommendation. next the committee heard phase 2 of the candlestick point/hunter's point project. this commission heard the item on april 26 this year. the commission's actions including approving the zoning code to remove the jamestown parcel from candlestick point and the removal of the stadium from the hunter's point area plan. planning commission voted to approve this package amendments. public comment was generally favorable they highlighted the robust community benefits program. there were some concerns with the shipyard cleanup. supervisor kim, while supportive, encouraged ocii and the project sponsor to consider adding add usual housing to the program in future years. the land use committee voted to forward the items to the full board with positive recommendation. at the

i want to welcome supervisor jeff sheehy. [applause] > >> this is the first time i have been back here since being appointed by mayor lee, so it's a special moment. this was the first outpatient hiv clinic in the country and some of the people are still here and still working 30 years plus into the epidemic. the very first patients who came in, none of them made it out. there are stories of people will tell of the doctors and nurses and caregivers sitting around the table and everybody crying because there was nothing they could do. this place has special meeting because it's the place where getting to zero is hatched. we made substantial progress and couldn't have done it without the support of the city, mayor lee and now mayor ferrell. i really want to thank mayor ferrell for his commitment that goes back to being on the board for the finance committee the idea of no new hiv infectionst and no hiv deathst and no stigma, people thought we didn't know what we were talking about, but the great thing is we did get new tool. we

seconded by supervisor sheehy. planning. >> i sent an email asking to be moved to friday. >> supervisor cohen: no problem, that it fine. we'll see you tomorrow. >> item number six is related to the planning department. >> supervisor cohen: sir, are you prepared to talk on item six? >> yes, i am. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. this is the planning code fees for certain permit transportational. >> clerk: amending planning code and fees set forth in ordinance to clarify the fees applicable to projects with no very little construction cost and to change the fees for transportation analysis. >> supervisor cohen: okay, so, i understand that this item -- is it ready to be heard? >> there are few steps that we need to do to complete the item. take it back to planning commission. like to request that it be continued to a day to call the chair. >> supervisor cohen: not a problem. i still need to take public comment on item six. i will open up for public comment. we are discussing item six. if you like to speak on item six,

. >> supervisor sheehy? >> it is not for apartheid -- proprietary software for voting. you have microsoft, and you have organize proprietary systems for its. if you follow operating systems, you have microsoft, you have os 4, and you have others that are open-source. developers can contribute to that. so it is -- the code is available to everybody. developers continuously and independently improve and look for bugs in the software. open-source software is considered to be safer because you have a community of eyes that are on the software. as opposed to proprietary software which is very habitab habitable. so it is one of those -- one of our, and if people know more, i would definitely wait. it is one of the paradoxes of where we are with information technology. it is something we hold close. it can be broken into and something that is widely available. many people are contributing to its. it is actually safer and more secure because you have a community as our eyes on it as opposed to sitting one bucket. >> one corporate entity owning it. >> exactly. once somebody figu

safai sheehy? >> supervisor sheehy: in memorial for elaine carol lambright of legrange, indiana. she was the mother of-legislative aide. she was born december 7, 1949, in indiana, to iris and myriam arlene dallas. they preceded her in death. living her life in legrange county, she was a small business owner. from 1999 to 2016, owned and operated nature's corner daycare. elaine was a homemaker that loved her cats, liked to garden and make crafts, interior design and a woman that always spoke her mind. the rest i submit. >> president cohen: can we take the in memoriam recognizing our fellow city family member, colton's mother's passing? without objection. thank you. >> clerk: thank you, madam president. supervisor stefani? >> supervisor stefani: i would like to take this time and commend our fire department, police department, american red cross and first responders that responded to a three-alarm fire at 1333 columbus. it is the border of district 2 and 3. supervisor peskin and i were in contact late at night. i texted him at 1:11 and apologized for walking him up and he said i di