on sheffield forgemasters, the right honorable gentleman knows that the problem was simply one of affordability. lord mandelson was writing out checks to companies like forgemasters, which he knew would bounce, all the while writing in his memoirs, "we were deep in a pit of debt and still digging." that was what was wrong. it was wrong to pretend that there could be government assistance for a great company like sheffield forgemasters when, as the former chief secretary to the treasury said, there was "no money left". >> i find it surprising that the deputy prime minister, who has preached the importance of open, transparent and honest politics, cannot bring himself to correct the record of something that was plainly wrong. the explanation that he is now offering is not the one that he offered previously. that explanation was about the dilution of the company's shareholding -- the same explanation that the prime minister offered the house. the prime minister told the house on 7 july, "the question is whether it is an appropriate use of taxpayers' money to give it to a business that could raise