please welcome sheldon white house! and applause) i love having senators on because you guys are the exclusive club, right? you guys got better washrooms and everything, i'm sure:. >> they're actually redoing the women's senate washroom. >> stephen: what does that matter to you, sir? >> makes everybody happier. >> stephen: it does? does it really. >> absolutely. >> stephen: you have a new book. let's push some pitch aer, sir. it's called "on virtues, quotations and insights to live a truly american life." that started off as a notebook of yours, right? >> yup. >> stephen: how long did you work on this book? >> close on 20 years i put the first one down and i've had this little paper book with me. when i love it, i write it down. >> stephen: that why congress can get nothing down because it takes you 20 years to write a book?" (cheers and applause) >> stephen: it's worse than that. we use mostly other people's words. >> selection. >> stephen: selection. >> stephen: so you're sampling. so this is your idea of after rap so

. >> a question from sheldon ooper, "as an army wife, did julia find any location more her home than any other? >> she considered white haven her home. in her memoirs, she again compared the white house to whitehaven because of the home that represented. they traveled so much and had so many different headquarters or homes are around the country that it would have been next to impossible, but she created home wherever she was for her family. >> it is the purview of army spouses over the years. we have one more video of white haven, the beautiful green tructure we showed you earlier, but you have to go to our web site. each week we are putting a feature on c-span.org/firstladies. we have a video that will show you the grants' life together. boy, does it look green. next is john watching us in washington state. you are on the air. caller: my name is john grant, no relation, but my great granduncle was on general grant's staff. i have a copy of his diary and in it it mentions a number of imes when he was in washington that he would have lunch with general grant's wife. and i was wondering if anybody could elaborate on th

white house by definition had darned well better not include 6103, because redaction is not appropriate. we are not covered by the privacy act, therefore if it includes names of individuals like sheldon and how you will target him or something and even if it included that, quite frankly it would not b61 '03. it would be communications from the outside. additionally, your people have unilaterally chosen to redact according to them private information to mr. werfel, you don't have the right to privacy indications. on government time and government equipment. if lois lerner or others have private to mitigation, they are not subject to 6103 because it 6103 is in that we expect them to be referred to criminal prosecution if you can't have private conversations and released 61 of the. that, of course, would be wrong. so as we go through this discovery and find far access redacting common equation at all, slow rolling discovery, limiting search terms can you may call prioritizing, but you're not prioritizing as we need them. it is my expectation that we should all receive communications to and from the white house. we should'v should have alreadyd communication between anyone who is conduct

white house by definition had darned well better not include 6103. the redaction is not appropriate. were not covered by the privacy act. therefore, even if it includes names of individuals like sheldon adelson and now you're going to target him for something o, even if it included that, quite frankly it would not b61 owe three. it would be communications outside. additionallythe additionally yor people have unilaterally chosen to redact according to them private information. mr. werfel, you don't have the right to have private communications on government time and government equipment. if lois lerner or others have private communications they are not subject to 6103 because if there is 6103 in their we expect them to be referred to criminal prosecution. yoyou can't have private conversation and really 6103. that, of course, would be wrong. so as we go through this discovery and find far access redaction, no question at all, slow rolling discovery, limiting search terms, you may call a prioritizing, but you're not prioritizing as we need him. it is my expectation that we should've offered receive communication to and from the widest. we should have received communication between anyo