and all encroachments above grade shelley documented to be fully maintained on the southern property >> and the questions? >> no. >> average expense line above grade? >> building code does not require permits to be issued for deaths and patio of debt of less than 30 inches above the grave. therefore, we would consider such items to be a simple matter. -- civil matter. let for? the requirement level? -- >> at the requirement level? >> id is not 30 inches above grade and would therefore not require a building permit. >> for them to put a deck and 30 inches, it would not be enforceable. that pending into a non compliance -- back ending into non compliance could not be for them to find there are arrayed? >> it with their foreign of our new building permit. less >> when we heard this before one year ago part of the new design. >> currently adapted and submitted in the documents. for this side in the rear, a as was said? in chile with several buildings in the keating construction that goes back onto the subject. >> think you. we're there. commissioners, rivers and in the owners of 135 is -

just, shelley is going to comment about six or seven people. is she just cannot be made an interesting comment. and i would just like to market because these is one of the areas where the complexity of the panel is starting to appear. the shelley, i'll let you come up when it's your time. i'll let you respect the order. i think you're coming up and feeling passionate to do that indicate something, which is are we talking politics are we talking healing? shall say more about that later. but i would just like to point out, i was also thinking a similar version of that question. i was thinking here we are talking about -- we started off talking about the healing of combat veterans and were full-scale into social and political philosophy or social and political critique. i think it's worth being in being a little more rigorous about again whether or not that should be the case. and if it's the case, why exactly is it the case? i think it's important to note that with the exception of professor mehlman, i don't think we had this thing go political s

there would be people like shelley mann and those guys. that kind of led me into bird and davis and monk and those guys. i did not know then that the roots went all they back to new orleans in the beginning. that came later. i am kind of excited that this is happening. that said, when sf jazz was here i did make a comment, and i did e-mail mr. loesser with my comment. in trying to form a jazz district, i wish that mr. knowles had bought a building on fillmore street. and that we had this venue there to strengthen district -- the district idea. i said the same thing when sf jazz came. i thought it was unfortunate that there were four blocks away or five blocks away from fillmore and had not been able to find a location closer to that area. based on that and some of our hearings on other institutions, i am going to talk to a supervisor campos about creating a jazz master plan for san francisco. [laughter] that would include other organizations like kcsm, which i listened to regularly. they are a public station and they are always looking for

bernard shelley's grave on the west side of the island near what was known as green beach and that's a photograph of his grave and he's still missing today this is someone named steve momar who no one even knows who he is and no you can't even find. a mention of him in any of the original rosters here's a picture of grave number eighteen with robert's brand bezel norman jr frank as the c. and henry lot so they're all still missing today this is a photograph of grave number eleven where there are one hundred forty five graves and only thirty two were disinterred this is a plot map of grave number thirty three where four hundred people were were listed as being buried but in reality only one hundred twenty nine are recovered one of those people by the way is alexander bonny man who was who won the congressional medal of honor in the battle of sorrow and in doing so he lost his life and he was buried in one of these temporary cemeteries and never found lieutenant alexander bunnymen was one of four congressional medal of honor winners which also included first lieutenant hawkins william

just, shelley is going to comment about six or seven people. is she just cannot be made an interesting comment. and i would just like to market because these is one of the areas where the complexity of the panel is starting to appear. the shelley, i'll let you come up when it's your time. i'll let you respect the order. i think you're coming up and feeling passionate to do that indicate something, which is are we talking politics are we talking healing? shall say more about that later. but i would just like to point out, i was also thinking a similar version of that question. i was thinking here we are talking about -- we started off talking about the healing of combat veterans and were full-scale into social and political philosophy or social and political critique. i think it's worth being in being a little more rigorous about again whether or not that should be the case. and if it's the case, why exactly is it the case? i think it's important to note that with the exception of professor mehlman, i don't think we had this thing go political s

a lot of us paid a lot of money to come here. >> shelley, i think it's a great question. i'll be the first person to say academia is not in for free speech and you're speaking from your heart. so you don't have to feel bad about that. it's a tough question. why not. it's a tough topic. so i mean, i'll take some responsibility. let me ask a question that will turn it around because i was thinking maybe i should've gotten to this question right away. these people do have some real expertise. so, what is the golden nugget from where you folks are? this is what i was trying to get at. i'll take responsibility. i didn't do it in a direct enough way. what is the golden nugget that you folks have been finding your part does? something that you think, you know, you walk around and they don't know this. they don't get it or the people that you're working with themselves are struggling for and they don't get? but you've been doing it for 10, 20 years and you're starting to see it. give us a golden nugget if you can. it might take a couple minutes for you to observe again, but maybe

shelley moore is a member of the transition team for the incoming majority. right now, there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of disagreement, but look k ahead, you've got the challenge of working with tea party new members who have a very different view of washington than the new majority leaders. >> well, i think that obviously there's a lot of them. there's 80 new members on our side and that's going to bring new and fresh ideas. a lot of folks were elected with an overwhelming feeling that washington doesn't listen. so, will they help us set the agenda? absolutely. they've been very vocal since they've been in washington this week. >> let's talk about earmarks. everybody's talking about earmarks and the republicans are going to have their vote this afternoon on voluntary decision on earmarks to give up earmarks now that mitch mcconnell has gone along with jim demint and others who have been calling for this decision. what is the real significance here? we're talking about now $15 billion, it used to be $18 billion, out of an enormous budget. it really will

he belonged to a circle of famous men, rent-a-car does ben included lord byron and the poets, shelley and keats. junius was a radical nonconformist. he rejected christianity. he dabbled in islam and hinduism. he was a vegetarian in the 1820's which was late in a lunatic. he was an opponent of slavery and he was a genius who could write poetry, sculpt marble, speak 10 ancient and modern languages and act. bruce had what you like to call the gesture if you're honest for it, mind. he believed he was a rare beam. someone separated from the rest of humanity by his incredible talent and american audiences agreed, booth was huge here. he toured nationally every year. he was admired by presidents from john quincy adams to andrew jackson. and he raised his two sons, edwin and john wilkes to believe that same was a marvelous prize. mind or genius he told these boys, happily belonged to no age, climb, or condition. instant since the fed can be quoted when even from the most despised classes, genius develops itself and towers above all the circles of the human race. powerful words to tell adolesc

>> no. [ laughter ] no, you're thinking of shelley duvall. no, which one is it?hat's right. so it takes us to "fisher king." it goes actor, movie, actor, movie. okay, "fisher king." we have to name another actor in that movie now. >> jimmy: jeff bridges. >> jeff bridges takes us to "king kong," takes us to jessica lange. jump in, jump in. >> jimmy: "grey gardens." >> "grey gardens" takes us to drew barrymore," takes us to -- >> jimmy: "e.t." >> "e.t." takes us to henry thomas, takes us to -- >> jimmy: was he in "a river runs through it," henry thomas? wasn't he brad pitt's brother in some movie? >> okay, "river runs through it" takes us to brad pitt, takes us to "burn after reading." i like that movie very much. [ cheers and applause ] i like that very much. >> jimmy: this is a fun game. i would love -- i could play this all night with you. >> so could i. but we have a limited amount of time. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: i got to say, your voice sounds very good, because i heard you're taking voice lessons. >> you heard correctly. that's right. >> now, what is -- why?

shelley, you can do this. she said steve, i know. it's junk. it's terrible that my husband is a doctor. but if i don't vote for it, she, nancy pelosi, will punish me. the other democratic congresswoman, who is no longer in congress, i'm happy to say, i was a political science professor at the university in nevada las vegas that i supported her in the past. i said here's the bottom line on this. these are all the things wrong with this idea. it produces the exact opposite effect of the presidents rhetoric, which is totally the big lie. it's as much as a big lie. and she says, she's from arkansas, steve, i know it's no good, but there must be something in there, i got to take it too. that's the slough off. that's what we're up against here. we just got to come to grips with the logic and common sense. left alone, there's only one way to lower health costs. at a health care provider and health insurer, for 40 -- for decades that out of its the old fashion way. you go to the market place, taken finish effective 35,000 employees, you go lean on the

. >> i am shelley. >> s-h-e -- jus >> t y. >> thank you for your service. >> thank you for your service. i spent a lot of time on the green ramp. >> thank you. >> b-e-c-k-y? >> thank you. >> thank you. >> hi, governor. erica borden, with citizens against government waste. >> [unintelligible] the had a big huge job. on corporate spending. spell it for me? >> [unintelligible] >> thank you. just handed up here and tell me what name? with an "i"? >> you understand. >> thank you, governor. i appreciate it. >> thank you very much. it is nice meeting you. [unintelligible] >> yes, sir. godspeed. >> ok. >> [unintelligible] >> thank you for being here today. >> i am from dallas. i am going tout dallas. -- to ut dallas. >> that is a great school. they have some pretty cool stuff going on. you know what? the marines are supposed to give me a ride, and my friends to have blown up, they say they are a pretty hot little machine. i went to italy in 2005 and flew one of the earlyc-27j's -- early c-127j's, and it was an awesome aircraft. this was the two-thirds model, a twin engine. 310 knots indicated,

lindsay fog but still not positive shelley. bring a lasting and for the giants. we have great weather anticipated for the parade louisa is falling net. >> it will be fantastic, but temperatures will warm up, it is pretty much the best weather they can ask for. here's a look green of james lick, this is, today warming up a bit, 57, by noon artie into the upper 60s. high temperature today 74 degrees. back down as low 60s by 8:00. this morning still dealing with some cold temperatures of into the north bay. 47 napa 49 fairfield, you can see san francisco, oakland is 30 into the 50s. livermore 48. antennae and we should be back into the '60s, really warming up a bit quicker than yesterday getting back into the '70s as we head toward noon, that is one world, but in the upper '70's. but some of the '60s by endicott. > it o'clocad8:00 a.m. 79 for livermore. here is a look at your 7 day around the bay. in nice little stretch of dry weather, you can see to march of which is getting into the mid-'80s. upper '70's around the bay 70 by the coast we will start the season chan

especially morgan and chicken and lynn nesbitt, who are also dinner co-chairs along with hyatt bath and shelley they have completely transformed this event in the last few years, great thanks to them. they deserve a lot more. [applause] also thank you to tina brown, "the daily beast" in st. john for sponsoring this evening's after party. somehow tenet has found time to do this in addition to everything she has done including editing "newsweek" and everything else. thank you, tina. [applause] thank you to executive director harold for his leadership and the outstanding staff of the national book foundation for all of their hard work making this evening possible. [applause] part of what makes this industry so much fun is the diversity of our publishers and you can see that tonight with this year's finalists. from one of the smaller february publishers in america, based in kingston new york, nonprofit publishers in minnesota and washington state to the largest publishers in america from the east coast to the west and many in between, this year's finalists represent the best of american writing and

just, shelley is going to comment about six or seven people. she just cannot be made an interesting comment. and i would just like to market because these is one of the areas where the complexity of the panel is starting to appear. the shelley, i'll let you come up when it's your time. i'll let you respect the order. i think you're coming up and feeling passionate to do that indicate something, which is are we talking politics are we talking healing? shall say more about that later. but i would just like to point out, i was also thinking a similar version of that question. i was thinking here we are talking about -- we started off talking about the healing of combat veterans and were full-scale into social and political philosophy or social and political critique. i think it's worth being in being a little more rigorous about again whether or not that should be the case. and if it's the case, why exactly is it the case? i think it's important to note that with the exception of professor mehlman, i don't think we had this thing go political scie

shelley is going to comment about six or seven people but made an interesting comment.f the areas with the complexity of the panel starting to appear. i think you are feeling passionate and that indicates something. are we talking politics or are we talking healing? i was also thinking, here we are, started off talking about healing of combat veterans, and we are full-scale into social and political philosophy and the social and political critique. it is worth being more rigorous about whether or not that should be the case and if it is, why is it the case? it is important to note that, with the exception of the professor, we don't have a single political scientist of some form. you are a legal scholar, but we don't have a single political scientist on the panel, yet what has happened is you have pushed us into thinking about politics, social structure and bureaucracy. this is something me -- something we may want to explore later. >> i want to qualify my question -- how do we keep the healer's accountable to healing? i want to qualify that by saying i am the daughter o

host: shelley in charleston, west virginia. caller: i have a comment and a question. you saying you want to get rid of earmarks? guest: yes, i am. the contemporary practice of earmarking. individuals getting pork for their district. caller: ok, well, if you get rid of earmarks, how are things done in people's districts? guest: most of the spending in districts is actually formula funding. for the agencies have a program where we have authorized -- or the agencies have a program where we have authorized, guaranteed a request. then the money is doled out that way. some members of coness say that they do not like the terms being used, those faceless bureaucrats. we know better how the money can be used. if we do not like how the money is allocated, we should not allocate the money. we have the power in congress to authorize those programs more narrowly or broadly than they currently are. that is what we should do instead of saying we do not like how the bureaucrats are spending money so we will have a parallel program in congress where we directly hand out money. often t

my team here with shelley capon and art gomer came up with 10 names that we see a sign on to this petition but whether it's 10 or 14 out of try seven is sizable. so what do they do? i think that that lair efforts on the ground could escalate. it was a sign of the times that the settlers didn't believe that olmert could reach an agreement and they didn't even bother demonstrating against him in 2008 although i must say his speech to the group brought a standing ovation and he clearly has a future as a public beaker. but who knows in israel about the politics, so they tend to come back. i would not rule that out. but the other opposition could escalate. simply they started against gaza because engagement was today. and you could see a situation that within 90 days, that sort of round demonstration will percolate in the way we haven't seen for several years. so what is not in yahoo! done? he's done something that's useful for him, which is that he is called in tzipi livni for a round of talks a bunch of time. but it's done on a tactical level is kept for more calcitriol elements of his coalit

host: shelley in charleston, west virginia. caller: i have a comment and a question. are you saying you want to get rid of earmarks? guest: yes, i am. the contemporary practice of earmarking. individuals getting pork for their district. caller: ok, well, if you get rid of earmarks, how are things done in people's districts? guest: most of the spending in districts is actually formula funding. for the agencies have a program where we have authorized -- or the agenes have a program where we have authorized, guaranteed a request. then the money is doled out that way. some members of congress say that they do not like the terms being used, those faceless bureaucrats. we know better how the money can be used. if we do not like how the money is allocated, we should not allocate the money. we have the power in congress to authorize those programs more narrowly or broadly than they currently are. that is what we should do instead of saying we do not like how the bureaucrats are spending money so we will have a parallel program in congress where we directly hand out money. oft

joe, shelley mcallister, melissa merrill, melissa newman, sheila, merrin, michael, james taylor, julia, and patrick washington. i would also like to thank out symposium, laura for her planning of today's events. is an effective job. in addition, to trusted advisors, passport numbers and low temperatures to aabpa, and brigham and join hi -- joan. [inaudible] i would have to be at 6:30 a.m. and i really appreciate not having to do that. i would also like to send a special thank you to our webmaster, george, and our executive secretary chris commute you probably met throughout the day. george didn't have this job of keeping our website up-to-date industry much looking for to the new and improved website will be coming in 2011. so, thank you guys very much. [applause] spent at this time unlike to wrap up our lunch session by encouraging you to visit our sponsor. the next panel begins at 2:00 so have a few minutes to get your bearings, talk with friends, make new ones, visit our sponsor tables and enjoy deserves. your evaluation forms are not in your pocket. they will be e-mailed to you tom