in another case of shepelev about the murder of a donetsk banker.serhii kyrychenko, committed on the order back in 2003 and revealed only in 2012, the ex-people's deputy was sentenced to 15 years in prison in august. shepelev's defense is also appealing this sentence, and the decision of the supreme court judges in the escape case opens up considerable prospects for significantly reducing the prison term, since it is believed that the supreme court actually sets precedents on which judges of lower instances are obliged to rely during making their decisions, the decisions of the supreme court, they are binding on other judges, lower appellate judges of the first instance, and these are requirements of procedural codes, that is , the supreme court has both legal and informal, huge, huge influences on how, in principle, the judiciary the system works, absolutely wild decisions of the supreme court in many cases, this is all an indicator of the huge problems that exist in the supreme court, moreover, after as far as we understood how difficult and wild

shepelev's case turned out to be quite revealing. it well illustrates how the judicial system works in ukraine, when a person accused of serious criminal offenses can escape punishment thanks to the skill of the officials. to circumvent the norms of laws and a kind of humanism. now, in the conditions of a full-scale war with russia , a person may be found guilty of treason in favor of the russian federation, four contract murders, one attempted murder and embezzlement of state funds. and today in that's all for me, it was the judicial control program and i, tatyana shustrova. if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see you in exactly a week. dear friends, i welcome you to the espresso tv channel, my name is lesya vakulyuk, and today our guest will be alexander kwasniewski, a polish politician, public figure and the president of poland. in 1995-2005, we are talking with mr. oleksandr literally the next day after poland voted, this year for those the elections had a r

the criminal court of cassation decided to help avoid punishment today we will talk to oleksandr shepelev, the ex-people's deputy who is suspected of a series of criminal offenses and treason in favor of the russian federation, but first, traditionally, to the news. the cabinet of ministers of ukraine has approved the international experts who will select the judges of the constitutional court, they are the fifth prime minister of poland, honorary president of the venice commission hanna sukhotska, the former minister of justice and internal affairs of slovenia, aleš zalar, as well as maureen o'connor, an american lawyer , a retired judge. they have three deputies. at the same time, ukrainian members, for example, the council of judges, participate in the procedure. delegated the head of the supreme court of ukraine, during yanukovych's time, yaroslav romanyuk, who supported the criminal dictatorial laws of january 16. president volodymyr zelenskyy delegated oksana vasylchenko, director of the educational and scientific institute of law of kyiv national university named after shevchenko,

in another shepelev case, the murder of the donetsk banker serhii. made to order two more

shepelev appeared already in russia, and while new suspicions of treason were brought against him in our country, he tried to legalize himself in the russian federation as a political refugee and ended up in sizo. however, in 2017, the aggressor's country refused to extradite him to ukraine. from the answer of the prosecutor general's office of the russian federation. according to article 12 of the federal law on refugees, chepelev oleksandr oleksandrovich was granted temporary asylum on the territory of the russian federation. according to article 19 of the convention on legal assistance and legal relations , it is impossible to satisfy the request for the extradition of oleksandr oleksandrovych shepelev. it was possible to detain sheppelev again in 2018 in the territory of the kyiv region. he has been in custody since then. in august 2020 , the dysnian district court convicted shepelev of escaping. with custody during hospital stay up to seven years of imprisonment with confiscation of property. the kyiv court of appeal also agreed with this verdict. the defense of the accused ex-p

shepelev 's case turned out to be quite revealing, it well illustrates how the judicial system worksses can avoid punishment thanks to the skill of the servants of themis to circumvent the norms of laws and a kind of humanism. now at large in the conditions of a full-scale war with russia, a person may be behind whose shoulders it is likely treason in favor of the russian federation, four contract murders, one attempted murder and embezzlement of state funds. and for today i have everything, it was the judicial control program and i, tatiana shustrova. if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see you in exactly a week. not to god. hell, how does the russian orthodox church create private military companies, and where did the 10 guided bombers hit? greetings to everyone from espresso, i'm anna eva melnyk and this is today's news summary. self-sufficient and independent. this is what the representatives of the moscow church in ukraine consider themselves to be. after the parliament's vote on the bill banning religious

let us remind you that the russian federation did not extradite shepelev to ukraine. co-author of the savchenko law, former people's deputy mykola palamarchuk, claims that the supreme court did not have apply this rule regarding the term on the territory of russia, if there was no official extradition. the law stipulates that citizens of ukraine are imprisoned on the territory of ukraine, that is, if the imprisonment of this citizen was on the territory of another state, then of course, according to the law, the court should not count it. moreover, by a double coefficient, the judges of the supreme court counted shepelev's term of punishment, as well as the term of his arrest as part of the investigation of other criminal crimes, again manipulating the savchenko law, according to which the term of pre-trial detention is included in the term of the imposed punishment only within the limits of one criminal proceeding. in addition, the panel reassessed the circumstances of the case and canceled the confiscation of exnardep's property in favor of the state, which, accordi

shepelev's case turned out to be quite revealing. it well illustrates how the judicial system works in ukraine, when a person accused of serious criminal offenses can avoid punishment thanks to the mastery of the servants of themis to circumvent the norms of laws and a kind of humanism. now free in conditions of a full-scale war with russia, there may be a person responsible for alleged treason in favor of the russian federation, four contract murders, one attempted murder and embezzlement of state funds. and for today i have everything, it was the judicial control program and i, tatiana shustrova. if you want... about corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address, see you in exactly a week, caught the virus, faith has faith in decasan, inhaled decasan enters the lungs where the virus, decasan works, faith rejoices, dekasan - inhalation protection against viruses and bacteria. and dekasan is indicated for angina, dekasan is an inhalation antiseptic. i flew, flew, and the cough stopped me. cough

shepelev's case turned out to be quite revealing. it well illustrates how the judicial system works in ukraine when a person is accused of serious crimes criminal offenses, can avoid punishment thanks to the skill of the servants of themis, circumvent the norms of laws and a kind of humanism. now free in conditions of full-scale war. with russia , a person may end up with alleged treason in favor of the russian federation, four contract murders, one attempted murder and embezzlement of state funds. and for today i have everything, it was the judicial control program and i, tatiana shustrova. if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or this one email address see you exactly in a week. you are watching the program of the ukrainian voice of america chas taay. my name is maria ulyanovska. congratulations. us president joe biden addressed the american people from speech he tried to convince millions of americans that supporting ukraine and israel is important and in the interests of the united sta

former people's deputy oleksandr shepelev is accused of involvement in four contract killings and the of an attempted murder, and is also suspected of embezzling over 200 hryvnias from a genealogical bank and treason. he is not an entirely simple character, and is connected to a number of other criminal processes that have been investigated. and on it, there is a contract killing, there is a businessman there, this is a contract killing, that police colonel, which is not incriminated anywhere now, but not appears after the indictment , sheppelev continued. he spent time abroad until he was finally detained in hungary and extradited to ukraine in 2014. he was ordered to be arrested, but the suspected ex-people's deputy pretended to be sick, went to the hospital, and then escaped again. several vehicles entered the territory of the hospital, in which we assume that our suspect disappeared...

word, for me no, but for me no , but not only shpugachev is, let me give a simple example, yes, shepelev , it was, it was, he called when i didn’t study this, yes , then in the twenty-second he cursed you, and then he returns to the air of the federal channel, it’s like, i don’t know, i, well, after all. the channel’s management is in charge of the channel’s politics, but it’s definitely not me who is doing this, well , i saw it there according to shipelev, i was there in mariupol, well, this is an indulgence, in the donbass, you know, what’s the matter, this is the same , well, this is a rather complicated question, in fact, i’m not delirious, i’m not delirious now, no, i understand, precisely because i understand that to what extent this is a difficult question, well, a person can, should have the right, well, how to change his point of view, yes, he must commit some actions, and what actions from your point of view will be sufficient for us to understand him? i don’t know, everyone has to decide this for themselves too, in general, i’ll be honest, i why so well to answer this question

how does the supreme court help to avoid the punishment of ex-people's deputy shepelev?law, which should not have been applied, was applied. so why does the united states demand that all supreme court justices be vetted. this is all an indicator of the huge problems that exist in the supreme court. congratulations, judicial control is on the air. since 2014, ukraine has quite successfully, although not quickly, passed the difficult test of compliance with european standards: the renewal of the supreme court, the creation of a public integrity council, the launch of the anti-corruption court and the introduction of transparent tenders can be considered successful initiatives. however , this was not enough to solve the chronic problems of ukrainian justice. rebooting the system now requires radical measures. especially against the background of high-profile corruption scandals, which regularly involve the servants of themis at all levels. after the largest bribe in the history of ukraine received by the judges of the supreme court, the united states government requires us

word, for me, no, well , for me, no, but not only shpugachev is, let me give a simple example, yes, shepeleved crime, i didn’t study this, yes, then he cursed you on the twenty-second, and then he returns to the air of the federal channel, how’s that? i don’t know, well, after all, the channel’s management is in charge of the channel’s politics, but it’s definitely not me who is doing this. well, i saw it there in hisselvo, he was there in mariupol, well, and this is an indulgence, in donbass, you know, what’s the matter, that’s it, well, it’s a rather complicated question, in fact, i’m not meandering, i i’m not meandering now, no, i understand, precisely because i understand that how difficult this question is, well, a person can, should have the right. well, how can i change my point of view, yes, he must commit some actions, and what actions from your point of view will be sufficient for us to understand him? i don’t know, everyone must decide this for themselves, in general , i’ll be honest, why am i answering this question this way? i don’t think it’s that important, that’s because... w

ward, but on which they can see a new wonderful show about animals among friends, hosted by dmitry shepelev our country . i don’t know how to explain to these guys why the one who questions what they risk their lives for every day entertains them on the screen today for public money. who will explain to me what to tell them? i think, dear doctor, we partially tried today talk about this topic and answer these questions, and you can probably find an explanation for this, for example, we receive other requests, this is written by subscribers, in my telegram channel. dear nikita sergeevich, how can we explain the fact that singer anya loroc, who transferred money to the armed forces of ukraine, sits on the jury on the ntv channel, i know that her concerts were canceled in rostov, krasnodar, now she plans to give a concert in moscow in september, how is this possible , is it possible to raise this topic? well, in general, this is our duty, in principle, to you, to the audience. raise, discuss the questions that you pose, we checked, indeed , a new season was released on the ntv channel, a popul

understood everything, at least, i hope a lot . immediately after this happened, dmitry andreevich shepeleve list of peacekeepers, at the moment, the peacekeeper immediately sentenced him to death for having visited the dpr, for expressing his position, he realized his mistakes, active race, if you like, in principle, this is what we are about we strived for some clarity, a different conversation, in my opinion, i could be wrong, but still, it’s probably better to do this clarification earlier than letters arrive with questions that have to be answered , mr. solovyov touched on any lorok, that’s what he didn’t say, here’s korolina miroslavna kuyok, she, and not lorok, is a person subject, in the opinion of the ukrainians , to immediate detention, on april 23, 2023, she was included in the list of peacekeepers, while they are working very actively against the flocs, tsypso threw in anything, money transfers, supposedly to help svu, the shells are signed from her, why, because it’s scary for them, for their propaganda , it’s a colossal blow that a popular ukrainian performer came to russia, i

i want to remind you of what vladimir rudolfovich, the presenter working on our channel, dmitry shepelevid, yes, he wrote on the 24th, while driving his child to school, he wrote extremely emotionally, after that he did not run anywhere, he was here, he did not speak. i took him by the hand, boarded his plane, brought him to rostov, from rostov he went to the land of donetsk, he didn’t tell people, he listened silently, he came to mariupol, he looked at everything, he understood everything, at least i hope a lot, immediately after this happened, at the moment the peacekeeper immediately sentenced him to death for having visited the dpr, for what he had expressed his position, he realized his mistakes, active repentance, if you like, in principle, this is what we strived for, to have some kind of clarity, another conversation, in my opinion, i could be wrong, but still, probably , it’s still better to clarify this... to do it before the letters arrive, with questions that have to be answered , mr. solovyov and annie loroc touched on, that ’s what he didn’t say, here’s korolina miroslavna

so i want to remind you of what vladimirovich, the presenter working on our channel dmitry, said shepelevyes, he wrote on the 24th out of emotion. while taking the child to school, he wrote extremely emotionally, after that he didn’t run anywhere, he was here, he didn’t perform, i took him by the hand, landed his plane, brought him to rostov, from rostov he went to the land of donetsk, he didn’t told. he listened silently, he came to mariupol, he looked at everything, he understood everything , at least, i hope a lot, immediately after this happened, dmitry andreevichev found himself on the peacekeeper’s list, at the moment the peacekeeper immediately sentenced him to the death penalty for visiting the dpr, for expressing his position, for realizing his mistakes, active repentance, if you like. in principle, this is what we were striving for, to have some kind of clarity, another conversation, in my opinion, i could be wrong, but still, it’s probably better to do this clarification before the letters arrive, mr. soloviev and anya lork touched on the questions that have to be answered, tha

for me, no, well, for me, no, but it’s not just shpugacheva, let me give a simple example, yes, shepelev it was, it was, he called it criminal, i didn’t study this, then he cursed you in the twenty-second, and then he returns to the air of the federal channel , it’s like, i don’t know, i, well, the channel’s management is in charge of the politics of the channel, yes, it’s definitely not me who is doing this, so, well, there i saw it hissingly... he was there in mariupol, well, and this is an indulgence in the donbass, uh, you know, what’s the matter, this is the same, well, sort of, this is a rather complex question, in fact, i’m not meandering, i’m not meandering now, no, i understand , precisely because i understand that how difficult this question is, well, a person can, should have the right, well, how to change his point of view, right? he must perform certain actions, and what actions, from your point of view, will be sufficient for us to understand him? i don’t know, everyone has to decide this for themselves too, in general , i’ll be honest, why am i answering this question this

how does the supreme court help to avoid the punishment of ex-people's deputy shepelev?'s law, which should not have been applied, was applied. so why does the united states demand that all supreme court justices be vetted. this is all a huge indicator problems that are in the supreme court. on thursday, october 19, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tetyana shustrova on tv. no matter what ukrainians think about, no matter what they talk about, war still comes first. war and our victory. espresso only, from monday to sunday. completely different spheres of human activity. sports, health, politics, return of crimea, military analytics. nine presenters, journalists, experts, opinion leaders. in real time: about the most current: events through the prism of the war in author's projects on espresso. well, gentlemen, now let's talk a little about the situation in zaporizhzhia, which is going away after yesterday's rocket attack, i'll remind you. that, in particular, as of yesterday morning, when we were still talking about it, only two dead people were know

of criminal crimes and treason in favor of the russian federation, ex-people's deputy oleksandr shepelev, but first traditionally to the news. the cabinet of ministers of ukraine approved the international judges who will select the judges of the constitutional court, they became the fifth prime minister of poland , the honorary president of the venice commission , hanna sukhotska, the former minister of justice and internal affairs of slovenia, alesh zalar, as well as maureen o'connor, an american lawyer, judge retired they have three deputies. at the same time, ukrainian members participate in the procedure. for example, the council of judges delegated the head of the supreme court. of ukraine, during the times of yanukovych, yaroslav romanyuk, who supported the criminal dictatorial laws of january 16. president volodymyr zelenskyy delegated oksana vasylchenko, director of the educational and scientific institute of law of kyiv national university named after shevchenko, to the advisory group of experts. the verkhovna rada has yet to decide on its delegates to the advisory group of exp

how does the supreme court help to avoid the punishment of ex-people's deputy shepelev?plied savchenko law, which should not have been applied. but why does the united states demand that all supreme court justices be vetted? this is all an indicator of the huge problems that exist in the supreme court. on thursday, october 19, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova on the espresso tv channel. the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians. victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics, serhii rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this. people who have information and shape public opinion. people who defend ukraine and create the future right now, the main and interesting thing in the verdict program is serhiy rudenko. from monday to friday at 20:00, repeat at 12:10. recently, signals from our entrepreneurs have become more frequent that they are under some kind of economic pressure, well, in any case , the fest corporation has addressed, so to speak, with certain resonant statements, but b

word , well , for me, no, ah, but it’s not just shpugacheva, let me give you a simple example, yes, shepelev, did not study this, yes, then in the twenty-second he cursed you, and then he went on the air of the federal channel, how's that? i don’t know, i, well, after all, the channel’s management is in charge of the channel’s politics, yes, it’s definitely not me who is doing this, well, well, i saw it in hisselvo, he was there in mariupol, well, and this is an indulgence in the donbass, you know what’s the matter , this is... well, this is a rather complicated question, in fact, i’m not meandering, i’m not i’m meandering now, no, i understand, precisely because i understand that how complex this question is, well, a person can, should have the right, well, how to change his point of view, yes, he must commit some actions, and what actions from your point of view, whether they will be sufficient for us to understand it, i don’t know, everyone must decide this for themselves too. in general, i’ll be honest , why am i answering this question this way? i don’t think it’s that important, becaus

dmitry shepelev, who works on our channel, yes, he wrote on the twenty-fourth under emotions, takings here, he did not perform, i took him by the hand, sat him down him on the plane, brought him. from rostov he went to the land of donetsk, he did not tell people , he listened silently, he came to mariupol , he looked at everything, he understood everything, at least i hope a lot, immediately after it happened, dmitry andreevich sheppelev ended up on the peacekeeper's list, at the moment the peacekeeper immediately sentenced him to death, for the fact that he visited the dpr, for the fact that he expressed his position, he realized his mistakes, active race, if you like, in principle, we to this is what we strived for, to ensure that there was some kind of clarity, another conversation, in my opinion, i could be wrong, but still, it’s probably still better to do this clarification earlier than letters arrive with questions to which. .. here is korolina miroslavna kuyok, she, and not lorok, is a person subject, in the opinion of ukrainians, to immediate she has been detained since apri