what is this, sherlock holmes? who does such things?ims are tied to your grad student, melissa walls. (scoffs) here we go again. cardoza: look, these are your words left at the crime scene. we believe melissa is behind this. when's the last time you saw her? i see her all the time. she was in my office just yesterday. (phone ringing) melissa, i don't have that kind of sway. i don't have tenure yet. but everybody listens to you. you're my advisor, my mentor. can't you fight for me? look, you have to understand. falsifying your data was a serious breech. oh, come on. everybody does it. yeah, well, not everybody gets caught! cardoza: you know if she touched anything when she was in there? i left her alone for a few minutes when i talked to the department secretary. all right, we're gonna have to process everything that's in your office. tripp: and you and i are gonna spend some quality time together, till we get this thing figured out. i don't need protection. i have a lecture this afternoon. it'll be a... i'll be in a room full of student

what is this, sherlock holmes? who does such things?ims are tied to your grad student, melissa walls. (scoffs) here we go again. cardoza: look, these are your words left at the crime scene. we believe melissa is behind this. when's the last time you saw her? i see her all the time. she was in my office just yesterday. (phone ringing) melissa, i don't have that kind of sway. i don't have tenure yet. but everybody listens to you. you're my advisor, my mentor. can't you fight for me? look, you have to understand. falsifying your data was a serious breech. oh, come on. everybody does it. yeah, well, not everybody gets caught! cardoza: you know if she touched anything when she was in there? i left her alone for a few minutes when i talked to the department secretary. all right, we're gonna have to process everything that's in your office. tripp: and you and i are gonna spend some quality time together, till we get this thing figured out. i don't need protection. i have a lecture this afternoon. it'll be a... i'll be in a room full of student

. >> just because it has that sherlock holmes thing. so much of what i do involves looking through directories and all of these map's for changes that have been made and tracking when those things were done and there are other sources in text that can be very difficult to get through but have really wonderful pieces of information. the voters rolls. the pulp directories tell you things about the fabric of the city. i had an interesting case to establish a legal dwelling unit that had to pre date a certain date with a ceiling height and it turns out a person resided at this address that was a bartender and a regular sterd socialist. the owner of the building that lived there owned the bar and he was the current chairman of the socialist party of the city. with that city planning was willing to acknowledge the bartender lived in his bosses unit in the basement of his house. there you have it. >> amazing. we will stick around and answer questions after but we have to stop right now because the time is up and i want to thank jeremy, paul, a

there is a book following the sister of the famous sherlock holmes detective. "skin hundred, the resurrection of magic," will be discussed. kids still love, myth, biology, and magic. the vegan authors will discuss their motivation. this is all about the big movement, and what inspires people who live the good life. >> will they do demonstrations? >> there should be fitted and demonstrations. come back on sunday, and one of the highlights it is at the literary salon. haole robinson peete and brought peeete will be there. they have written a children's book and the famous the nfl quarterback has written a memoir about raising a son with autism. they will both be there next sunday. >> that is neat. everyone in the family has a different experience. if you have ever seen them talk about it, it is inspiring. >> it really is. >> is this free? >> it is, and you can check it out on the web site. >> as next weekend. good luck with everything. >> do not go away, dr. him -- dr. kim hammond answers your pet questions when we come back. first, i look around town. >> live, f

nor ignore obvious changes, as sherlock holmes would tell us. winston churchill said, more than once, but i think it is applicable to native today. no matter how beautiful the strategy, you must occasionally look at the results. i believe that nato, the united states, and russia, and other nations must look at the trajectory and results of our current policies and we must think anew if we are going to protect our citizens. on the nuclear securities side of the ledger, almost 20 years after the breakup of the soviet union, would continue to live with the risk of catastrophic nuclear accidents that is unfortunately > 0 and much higher than it should be after the end of the cold war. the u.s. and russia should pursue steps to increase warning time and decision time for u.s. and russian leaders. it makes no sense whatsoever 20 years after the end of the cold war that the president of russia and the president of the united states to have only a few precious minutes to decide whether to launch their new weapons in the event of getting a warning from t

i mean, you didn't have to be sherlock holmes to figure out we've had an increased number of terroristlots and attacks over the past 18-24 months in the united states and that these weren't orchestrated from abroad, but rather were carried out by either lone wolves or jackals as we call them, single individuals who become radicalized over the internet or small groups of people who may have become also radicalized by clerics in this country. so this is what has been going on for several years now, and the government's finally publicly acknowledging it. jon: faisal shahzad, the guy accused of trying to set off that suv bomb in new york's times square, the feeling is that he had a little bit of training from overseas, but he had maybe more inspiration than he had ability? >> that's right. and he was the exception in the having any training overseas. and he certainly was not very proficient in bomb building. these are not master terrorists that have spent several years up in the mountains of afghanistan and on the pakistani border learning their trade. more often than not it's someone like

nor ignore obvious changes, as sherlock holmes would tell us. i think it is applicable to native today. you must occasionally look at the results. i believe that nato, the united states, and russia, and other nations must look at the trajectory and results of our current policies and we must think anew if we are going to protect our citizens. on the nuclear securities side of the ledger, almost 20 years after the breakup of the soviet union, would continue to live with the risk of catastrophic nuclear accidents that is unfortunately > 0 and much higher than it should be after the end of the cold war. the u.s. and russia should pursue steps to increase warning time and decision time for u.s. and russian leaders. it makes no sense whatsoever 20 years after the end of the cold war that the president of russia and the president of the united states to have only a few precious minutes to decide whether to launch their new weapons in the event of getting a warning from their generals which could be a false alarm. not many think about it. not many peop

this impeachment reads like a scene in sherlock holmes in the silver blaze case when holmes solves a mystery by noting the curious incident of the dog in the nighttime. the scotland yard detective objects and tells mr. holmes, the dog didn't do anything in the nighttime. to which holmes responds, that was the curious incident. it was the absence of the dog barking that holmes found so suspicious. the curious incident in this case is that while the house continually refers to a massive investigation of various judges, and despite the fact that judge porteous waived the statute of limitations on crimes, no indictment was ever brought against him. after years of inquiry. there was a reason the dog did not bark in this case. judge porteous' actions while in some cases showing poor judgment were in fact entirely legal. now, there has been an effort to portray the defense' past inquiries to cast blame on the judges of louisiana or suggesting that misconduct is generally accepted. mr. schiff attempted to make that argument, saying we were going to argue oh, it's just new orleans. that's not

this impeachment reads like a scene in sherlock holmes in the silver blaze case which holmes solves the mystery by quote by the curious incident of the dog in the nighttime. the scotland yard detective, however, objects saying the dog didn't do anything in the nighttime to which holmes responds that was the curious incident. it was the absence of the dog barking that holmes found so suspicious. the curious incident in this case is that while the house continually refers to a massive investigation of various judges called wrinkled robe and despite the fact that judge porteous waived the statute of limitations on crimes, no indictment was ever brought against him. after years of inquiry. there was a reason the dog did not bark in this case. judge porteous' actions, while in some cases showing poor judgment, were, in fact, entirely legal. now, there's been an effort to portray the defense's past inquiries in this case as to cast blame on the judges of louisiana or suggesting that misconduct is generally accepted. mr. schiff attempted to make that argument saying we were going to argue, oh,