them was for fame of for his country and very popular in russia has a series of stories about sherlock holmes charlotte holmes and he has a hapless character in those stories the inspector that strayed from scotland yard will never have those details see not he doesn't have the method of deduction he's not particularly smart about it you know his role is to be that my background who are the extraordinary detective powers of sherlock holmes one will use that the stranger latches on something that is on the service of a crime and isn't hard to provide but an owl conclusions only to be overturned by sherlock holmes who always finds what is behind the crime and what is the motive for it was you know we were to remove course of them i am you're not trying to say that those who work in scotland yard today are not professional god guard me from that about the movie i do think that we could all stand to benefit from having a sherlock holmes with us today with you would you or you could be the last of the collective inspector of inspector list straight to today are the high level members of the u.k. g

his role is to be the background for the extraordinary detective powers of sherlock holmes. the stray laches on something that is on the surface of the crime and is in a hurry to provide conclusions, only to be overturned by sherlock holmes who always finds what is behind the crime and what is the motive for it. of course i am not trying to say that those who work in scotland yard today are not professional, guard me from that, but i do think that we could all stand to benefit from having a sherlock holmes with us today. but the collective inspector list stray today are the high level members of the uk government who are coming up with egregious, superficial, and unsupported accusations which have far-reaching consequences. russia calls upon the officials of the uk to give up on the bureau practices which belong in the 19th century, give up on ultimatums and threat and unsupported accusations, give up with their colonial habits and get back to the area which is governed by law. in such situations similar to what we have in the letter by theresa may, normally what should be d

i do think that we could all stand to benefit from having a sherlock holmes with us today. inspectortive lestrade at the head members of the u.k. government who are coming up with a gracious, andrficial -- egregious superficial accusations, which have far-reaching consequences. give up on the imperial practices that long to and unsupported accusations, give up the colonial habit and get back to the area which is governed by law. in such a situation, similar to what we have in the letter by theresa may, normally, what should be done is using instruments of legal assistance. again up, let me say once , russia had nothing to do with this incident. london istum from to being that we consider something that we cannot pay attention to. consider knowledge void. null and void. including the european convention on criminal matters and will provide the samples of substances that the u.k. investigation is referring to for a joint investigation, since you are saying that they are russian in origin. this is not optional. this is a mandatory requirement under the the mechanism for the 9.

security council and mayday roger —— rather bizarre and trivialising observation that we needed sherlock holmesthe case. can the un security council do any thing given that russia has a veto and can block any concrete action? it is interesting nikki haley setback, because like everybody else in the security council she would know that russia would veto any move to take the concrete measures she proposed. in calling this meeting the british have much more limited ambitions. what they wanted to do was provide a forum, the biggest diplomatic stage in the world, that horseshoe table at the security council, so that the international community could show solidarity with britain and condemn russia's actions. for the most part, that happened today at the un in new york. what does the un secretary—general himself say about the poisoning link? el ghazi says it is unacceptable, he says these of chemical weapons is a violation of international law. what antonio guterres stopped short of doing was pointing the finger of blame at russia. he said it was not in his job to assign blame, but clearly most member

before the security council, and made the bizarre and trivializing observation that we needed sherlock holmes to solve the case. laura: can the usecurity council do anything, given that russia has a veto and can block any concrete action? nick: it is interesting that nikki haley said that, becse she knows like everybody else on the security council that russia would veto any move to take the concrete measures anshe was proposing for. the british in calling this meeting have much more limited ambitions for it. what they wanted to do was toov e a forum, the biggest diplomatic stage in the world, that horseshoe table at the security council, so the international community couldol showarity with britain and condemn russia's actions. for the most part, that happened today at the united nations in new york. laura: what is the un's secretary-general himself saying about the poisoning? nick: he said it is unacceable, the use of chemical weapons is a violation of international law. what antonio guterres stopped short of doing, hover,as pointing the finger of blame and russia. he said it wasn't his job

of revenge poisoning by scrip all those former employers in moscow and setting a record even sherlock holmes never dreamed of the complex investigation of this one would think mysterious crime as apparently started and already run its course and conclusively ended in a hole of just eleven days for more on how the script all incident is being politicized by all the usual suspects here is r t s on your part. in his first remarks on these great ball poisoning putin described the u.k.'s handling of the case as destructive and provocative saying he's extremely concerned about the situation this comes as president trump has released a rare joint statement along with his british french and german counterparts concerning the attack on the former double agent the strongly worded letter called the incident an assault on the united kingdom sovereignty as well as a clear violation of the chemical weapons convention and a breach of international law however other language in the joint statement was less certain it reads quote the united kingdom thoroughly briefed its allies that it was highly likely that

yesterday, a playoff of sherlock holmes, in a scotland yard of the 19th century.w the telegraph playing that up as well. there is the rhetoric that is miles apart. john, what is the actual evidence that russia did this? insn't scotland yard weigh that they did it? john: they will argue that this nerve agent could only be level,d at a military sponsored by a government. that russia is one of the few countries that could do this. targeting a russian citizen. they are as certain as you possibly can be that this was a russian state directed operation. they will argue that they can't give all the details away because of national security. you are right. we never know 100%. the russians are contesting that. show us proof. across party lines, all lines of government in the u.k., there seems to be certainty about this. we are seeing that from allies in europe and the u.s. as well. there is very little doubt that russia was responsible. tom: with all your experience, what will be the moscow response? tat, whatever the number of bodies is? or even further to show who is bos

you and made a bizarre observation that we need sherlock holmes to solve this case.curity council do anything given that russia has a beta and it can block any concrete action? nikki haley said that because she knows that russia will veto any move to ta ke that russia will veto any move to take concrete measures that she was proposing. and the bishops —— the british in calling this meeting had ambitions. they wanted to provide a forum, the biggest politics stage in the world, that horseshoe table at the world, that horseshoe table at the security council, so that the international community could show solidarity and condemn russia's actions. for the most part, that happened today at the united nations in new york. what does the un secretary general say himself about the poisoning? he said it is unacceptable. the use of chemical weapons is a violation of international law. what antonio gutierrez stop short of doing was pointing the finger of blame at russia and he said it was not his job to assign blame. but clearly, most members on the security council this afternoon