and but the issue is more what is the proper way for the city to regulate those shilts it's not whether they wish be her i want them her but what's the proper way i've made it clear open the substance of the proposal i believe the substance of the proposal is flawed i believe is dollar a bus stop is not enough and if we are voting on the merit i'll vote against it it necessity fair to have a situation where your charging a dollar a bus stop and then to those companies and you see what the afternoon san franciscan has to deal with in terms of paying $2 to ride muni and if the citations are given to them they have to pay over $200 but the issue is sequa. it's based on what i see in terms of the sequa analyzed that's been done if i have problems with the pilot and i'm certainly prepared at this point to support of the appeal for a number of reasons one i believe the analysis provided by the planning around the category 6 exemption from my prospective is very circling last year in nature. i don't see how lane can say all we're talking about her is a mere explanation elevation when that's an

gotten rid of the cars because of the access to the shuttles 43 miles are reduced because of the shilts and green house gases a reduced and from any cf we have a representative hereafter my presentation they can answer questions. we used the following principles to guide our presentation first, the safety of all yours that's our number one priority and making sure that the shuttles do a.d. verizon affect the operations it includes we're consistently improving the communications. those are the problems lack of enforcement clarity we feel a responsibility to recover our costs and lack of comprehensive costs as i mentioned most of our information comes from volunteer sources. the pilot approach helps us to act now and builds on the information we have provided and test out on approach why we gather for information to include the improvement costs are. i don't have to go through what the pilot entails it addresses the operating guidelines and compliance with the c puc and address the detail and congestion and will address the challenges with identification the permit fee will include fund f

a housing crisis those shuttles are a symptom not a cause given the carbon and the benefits those shilts have provided and given some of the tortures logic how the buses are saying its bad. the environment i urge you to support f this policy >> consulting and board of supervisors i'm am a long-term member of supervisor london breed's district 5 i was born in supervisor cowen district 24 years ago isle i've been going here from k through 12 i went to cal state and came back to san francisco because i wanted to revisit in my community. i would going to speak tonight but after hearing and being here 8 hours tonight it is important we work together and have unregulated shilts going on throughout the city we lose the data it's important we know it's important to have, you know, transportation and in which people aren't riding alone i got any driver's license when i was 21 her in san francisco i don't need a driver's license number but if you are going to the peninsula you do. and see what i'm saying i really urge you guys do consider it and keep the pilot program it's important to continuing

would demonstrately increase the number of shuttles open the street or the locations at which the shilts are picking up there's nothing about the prong that would change at the physical nature of what is happening around shuttles because of what mta is trying to do is say, you know, let's define what those are identify the new shared minnesota stops. now, of course, the shuttles could keep using the stop locations that are not minibus zones as they are now. this is really a awning project you can't pin any specific changes to, you know, even in a situation that's relatively fluid because the project is not proposing any physical changes >> but we can't guarantee increase not an impact we can't guarantee more shuttle buses won't appear because we're talking about legalization for sometime at the port earlier. is there nothing to say that more shuttles won't opt into the one dollars program and including a number of the buses it used the white zones because of the ticketing >> you know that's a concern we don't have any evidence to support. the flip side of the program is that it it is imp

concerns effected and no direct are indirect significant impacts due to the experimental regulation of shilts. turn to the issues raised by appellants the appellant first of all, has not provided a fair agreement for for seeable impacts under sequa. the appellant insinuated information one or more the following they came from a source of non-credentials and don't address the impact of the project itself and they contained erroneous suggestions they don't support a fair argument. the displacement points are - sequa only considers the physical impacts. many important concerns are raised but no one is caused by the pilot program. it's speculative to i doubt it any of the shuttles to the impacts as they relate to the proposal there are no physical impacts related to the proposed pilot program about the evidence supported doesn't show it and the analysis concludes that the isn't it true reservations for this 18 month project is not sixth for the impacts. the class of intimidation is applicable to exemption and the appellant has stated that class 6 is only limited to projects. there is absolutely n

i would here from the whole thing but in terms of concerns about those shilts from a it transportationrospective is exactly with the proposed pilot is aiming to address. i'm not sure i heard anything from the transportation prospective that will lead us to a different approach in terms of developing a program that is the purpose of the program to address the transportation concerns we've heard from the members of the public tonight and been hearing from our staff >> i'm trying to gather is this set in stone. for example, you heard one dollar is insufficient in increasing that. i'm trying to understand a little bit better within the organization of mta if there's a willing in-laws to incorporate some of the feedback we've heard you've heard along the way your e-mails and the testimony tonight. i've taken notation and members of the board have taken notes we'll share them with you. is there an openness >> to the president again. the purpose of this pilot period is to gather any simple additional feedback. and modify as need to be either the pilot or use that and will use that to develop