save lives by shirley weber and kevin mccarty to include policing best practices for police officers to use deadly force only when necessary to prevent imminent and serious body injury or death and require dees cesdees ca allegation when. bill 230 was introduced man tating training standards and require the peace officer standards and training implements a course of periodic training on the use of force. the bill would require uniform minimum guidelines for adoption by california law enforcement agencies for the use of force. the provisions of sb-230 would be operative continu contingentl

those on fighting on behalf of reforms and use of force reduction to come to the table lead by shirley weber and long with cabayeros and also with the speaker's office and the governor had been working hand-in-hand. i think they rest this is an ongoing negotiation and the ultimate resolution will be based on a compromised solution to both include extreme changes in the training standards along with a change in what is required i in terms of judges wn a use of force has been applied and i think those are realities happening right now at the state legislature. we understand from talking to the governor's office, they're hopeful that by the end of the month this can be resolved. so all sides is been working diligently andiligently and whes stripped of contradictory language, it was a big gesture on behalf of law enforcement and also, that 230 can't become law without ab392 and that is a reality that is standing there and this recognizes the need for reform, recognises the need to respect life and safety and i think that's what needs to be our highest priority, the safety of our citizens, as wel

this law has not been chases 1872 before passing a b 3.92 the bill's author shirley weber stood standing for almost 2 hours as lawmakers discussed problems facing police and the families who lost loved ones to police violence. my biggest concern. >>is not that we have not had unnecessary victims but to we didn't turn the table. and make law enforcement unnecessary victims. this bill is the first step. >>in a number of steps that do talk about race that talk about class talk about bias that talk about fear. >>the bill aims to change language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable some lawmakers concerned without a concrete definition of necessary this bill might not make a big difference noting district attorneys already way the necessity of police use of force what is it in this bill. >>that is such a significant departure from the status quo that talks about necessary in the air and that it's only done when it is necessary to prevent harm to the officer, our harm to someone else in the media community that all b

this law has not been chases 1872 before passing a b 3.92 the bill's author shirley weber stood standing for almost 2 hours as lawmakers discussed problems facing police and the families who lost loved ones to police violence. my biggest concern. >>had unnecessary victims but to we didn't turn the table. and make law enforcement unnecessary victims. this bill is the first step in a number of steps that do talk about race that talk about class talk about bias that talk about fear. >>the bill aims to change language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable some lawmakers concerned without a concrete definition of necessary this bill might not make a big difference noting district attorneys already way the necessity of police use of force what is it in this bill. >>that is such a significant departure from the status quo that talks about necessary in the air and that it's only done when it is necessary to prevent harm to the officer, our harm to someone else in the media community all but 2 lawmakers approved the bill

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement, the law for assembly member shirley weberliberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments. we're pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to where. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying to say

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement, the law for assembly member shirley weber civil liberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments. we're pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to work. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying t

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement the law for assembly member shirley weber civil liberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments with pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to work. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying to

introduce a resolution supporting california state assembly bill 392, introduced by sibley member shirley weber and assembly number kevin mccarthy caused the california act to save lives here for california act to save lives incorporates policing best practices that authorizes police officers to use deadly force only when necessary to prevent imminent and serious bodily injury or death and require de-escalation methods whenever possible. we're here today because of an comfortable truth, there is a deep rift between our law enforcement and some of the communities they serve. a rift that is deepened by the disproportionate use of deadly force, mostly against people of color. ab 392 is a california act to save lives seeks to heal the divide by changing standards. the bill states that police should not use deadly force when it is safe and reasonable to employ alternative methods and updates agency protocols to match best practices that will increase safety for both officers and the public. being a police officer can require making incredibly dangerous split-second decisions ab 392 acknowledges this

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement the law for assembly member shirley weber civil liberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments. we're pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to work. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying t

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement the law for assembly member shirley weber civil liberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments. we're pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to work. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying t

this law has not been chases 1872 before passing a b 3.92 the bill's author shirley weber stood standing for almost 2 hours as lawmakers discussed problems facing police and the families who lost loved ones to police violence. my biggest concern. >>is not that we have not had unnecessary victims but to we didn't turn the table. and make law enforcement unnecessary victims. this bill is the first step. >>in a number of steps that do talk about race that talk about class that talk about bias that talk about fear. >>the bill aims to change language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable some lawmakers concerned without a concrete definition of necessary this bill might not make a big difference noting district attorneys already way the necessity of police use of force what is it in this b%ll. >>that is such a significant departure from the status quo that talks about necessary in the air and that it's only done when it is necessary to prevent harm to the officer, our harm to someone else in the media community that

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement the law for assembly member shirley weber civil liberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments. we're pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to work. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying t

this law has not been chases 1872 before passing a b 3.92 the bill's author shirley weber stood standing for almost 2 hours as lawmakers discussed problems facing police and the families who lost loved ones to police violence. my biggest concern. >>is not that we have not had unnecessary victims but to we didn't turn the table. and make law enforcement unnecessary victims. this bill is the first step. >>in a number of steps that do talk about race that talk about class that talk about bias that talk about fear. >>the bill aims to change language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable some lawmakers concerned without a concrete definition of necessary this bill might not make a big difference noting district attorneys already way the necessity of police use of force what is it in this bill. >>that is such a significant departure from the status quo that talks about necessary in the air and that it's only done when it is necessary to prevent harm to the officer, our harm to someone else in the media community that

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement the law for assembly member shirley weberivil liberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments with pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we thick about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to where. >>we may be able to support it but it is refreshing to see this looks like it's a it's a dramatic shift.

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement the law for assembly member shirley weberome law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current standard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need time you do a billion have to make some adjustments. we're pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to where. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying to see but it is refre

trying to get law enforcement to the table after year of disagreement, the law for assembly member shirley weberiberties and some law enforcement groups are now in unified support for the latest version of a b 3.92 the bill changes the language in the law allowing police to use deadly force only when necessary instead of the current arstandard when reasonable the measure recently gained support from police groups as the latest version eliminated requirements for police to use a list of alternatives before turning to lethal force need ti you do a billion have to make some adjustments. we're pleased with the fact that the intent of the bill is still there. >>the enforcement elements is still there and it changes the narrative with law enforcement and what we think about in terms of the use of lethal force one of the bill's most vocal critics in the legislature and former chp officer tom lackey says he's encouraged by the changes. it's a dramatic change and maybe even to the point to where. >>we may be able to support it as a law enforcement community. but i'm still evaluating still trying to see b